manganese atom · Growth · Olea europaea (common olive)
4 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- IS CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE TECHNIQUE A USEFUL TOOL TO ASSESS MANGANESE DEFICIENCY AND TOXICITY STRESS IN OLIVE PLANTS? (2010)
no changeManganese treatment did not significantly affect shoot elongation rate.
DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE OF TWO OLIVE CULTIVARS TO EXCESS MANGANESE (2012)decreaseIn Picual olive plants, total fresh and dry weights and shoot elongation were significantly reduced under excess Mn compared with control plants.
What separates themSituation: not stated · toxic levelCompare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 0 on the same side, 1 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 1
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.