Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In Picual olive plants, total fresh and dry weights and shoot elongation were significantly reduced under excess Mn compared with control plants.

A claim from DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE OF TWO OLIVE CULTIVARS TO EXCESS MANGANESE · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In Picual olive plants, total fresh and dry weights and shoot elongation were significantly reduced under excess Mn compared with control plants.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
Picuale1
Treatment
excess Mne1
Outcome
total fresh and dry weights, as well as the shoot elongatione1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
control plantse1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“olive cultivars ‘Picual’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–79
e1

“the total fresh and dry weights, as well as the shoot elongation of ‘Picual’ plants were significantly reduced under excess Mn (640 μM), compared to the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–515

Title

DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE OF TWO OLIVE CULTIVARS TO EXCESS MANGANESE

T. Chatzistathis; I. Papadakis; I. Therios; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2012. doi:10.1080/01904167.2012.653080

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-0629d2a2e64bcd92a96df291b4d0e21acc3d5caecb4c4394252ac9c5eb4a4570 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

manganese atom · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.