Paper · 2012 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE OF TWO OLIVE CULTIVARS TO EXCESS MANGANESE

T. Chatzistathis; I. Papadakis; I. Therios; et al.

15
claims
28
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The response of three-month-old rooted cuttings of the olive cultivars ‘Picual’ and ‘Koroneiki’ grown in black plastic bags containing perlite as a substrate to excess manganese (Mn) (640 μM) was studied. The rooted cuttings were irrigated with 50% modified Hoagland nutrient solution. At the end of the experimental period, which lasted 130 days, the total fresh and dry weights, as well as the shoot elongation of ‘Picual’ plants were significantly reduced under excess Mn (640 μM), compared to the control plants (2 μM), whereas the growth of ‘Koroneiki’ plants was similar in both Mn treatments. The tolerance index, which is derived from the ratios between the plant growth data of different treatments and the control one, of ‘Picual’ plants to excess Mn was about half of this of ‘Koroneiki’ plants. In both cultivars, the concentrations of Mn in various plant parts (root, basal stem, top stem, basal leaves, top leaves) were significantly increased as Mn concentration in the nutrient solution increased. Furthermore, in the 640 μM Mn treatment, 2 to 2.5-fold greater Mn concentrations were recorded in almost all plant parts of ‘Koroneiki’, than those of ‘Picual’. Similar results were recorded with regard to the total Mn content per plant (‘Koroneiki’ absorbed much more Mn from the nutrient solution than ‘Picual’). On the other hand, excess Mn negatively affected the absorption of iron (Fe), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), phosphorus (P), zinc (Zn), and boron (B), depending on the olive cultivar. In both cultivars, while the Mn use efficiency was significantly decreased under excess Mn conditions, the nutrient use efficiencies of P, Ca, and Fe were significantly increased, compared to the control plants (2 μM Mn). It was also found that excess Mn resulted in a significant increase of stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of both cultivars, whereas the photosynthetic rate was significantly increased only in ‘Koroneiki’. In ‘Picual’, similar photosynthetic rates were recorded in both Mn treatments. The measurement of the various chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 ratios, revealed that the functional integrity of photosystem II (PSII) of photosynthesis was not affected due to excess Mn, irrespectively of the cultivar. In conclusion, although ‘Koroneiki’ tissues had much higher Mn concentrations than those of ‘Picual’, the parameters related to the growth and photosynthetic performance of plants indicates that the internal tolerance of ‘Koroneiki’ tissues to excess Mn was higher than this of ‘Picual’.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In Picual olive plants, total fresh and dry weights and shoot elongation were significantly reduced under excess Mn compared with control plants.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
Picuale1
Treatment
excess Mne1
Outcome
total fresh and dry weights, as well as the shoot elongatione1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
control plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“olive cultivars ‘Picual’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“the total fresh and dry weights, as well as the shoot elongation of ‘Picual’ plants were significantly reduced under excess Mn (640 μM), compared to the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth of Koroneiki olive plants was similar in both Mn treatments.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
Koroneikie1
Treatment
Mn treatmentse1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
similare1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“olive cultivars ‘Picual’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“the growth of ‘Koroneiki’ plants was similar in both Mn treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–598 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tolerance index of Picual plants to excess Mn was about half that of Koroneiki plants.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
Picuale1
Treatment
excess Mne1
Outcome
tolerance indexe1
Value
about halfe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“olive cultivars ‘Picual’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“The tolerance index, which is derived from the ratios between the plant growth data of different treatments and the control one, of ‘Picual’ plants to excess Mn was about half of this of ‘Koroneiki’ plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In both olive cultivars, Mn concentrations in root, stem and leaf parts increased significantly as the Mn concentration in the nutrient solution increased.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Organ / stage
root, basal stem, top stem, basal leaves, top leavese1
Treatment
Mn concentration in the nutrient solutione1
Outcome
concentrations of Mne1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“olive cultivars ‘Picual’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“In both cultivars, the concentrations of Mn in various plant parts (root, basal stem, top stem, basal leaves, top leaves) were significantly increased as Mn concentration in the nutrient solution increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1012 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the high Mn treatment, Koroneiki had 2 to 2.5-fold greater Mn concentrations than Picual in almost all plant parts.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
Koroneikie1
Outcome
Mn concentrationse1
Value
2 to 2.5-fold greatere1
Comparator
Picuale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“olive cultivars ‘Picual’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“2 to 2.5-fold greater Mn concentrations were recorded in almost all plant parts of ‘Koroneiki’, than those of ‘Picual’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1173 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Koroneiki absorbed much more Mn from the nutrient solution than Picual, giving a higher total Mn content per plant.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
Koroneikie1
Outcome
total Mn content per plante1
Comparator
Picuale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“olive cultivars ‘Picual’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“Similar results were recorded with regard to the total Mn content per plant (‘Koroneiki’ absorbed much more Mn from the nutrient solution than ‘Picual’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess Mn negatively affected the absorption of Fe, Ca and Mg in the olive cultivars, depending on cultivar.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Treatment
excess Mne1
Outcome
absorption of iron (Fe), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg)e1
Direction
negatively affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“excess Mn negatively affected the absorption of iron (Fe), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), phosphorus (P), zinc (Zn), and boron (B), depending on the olive cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess Mn negatively affected the absorption of P, Zn and B in the olive cultivars, depending on cultivar.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Treatment
excess Mne1
Outcome
phosphorus (P), zinc (Zn), and boron (B)e1
Direction
negatively affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“excess Mn negatively affected the absorption of iron (Fe), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), phosphorus (P), zinc (Zn), and boron (B), depending on the olive cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In both cultivars, Mn use efficiency decreased significantly under excess Mn compared with control plants.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment
excess Mne1
Outcome
Mn use efficiencye1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
control plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“olive cultivars ‘Picual’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“In both cultivars, while the Mn use efficiency was significantly decreased under excess Mn conditions, the nutrient use efficiencies of P, Ca, and Fe were significantly increased, compared to the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In both cultivars, the use efficiencies of P, Ca and Fe increased significantly under excess Mn compared with control plants.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment
excess Mne1
Outcome
nutrient use efficiencies of P, Ca, and Fee1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
control plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“olive cultivars ‘Picual’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“In both cultivars, while the Mn use efficiency was significantly decreased under excess Mn conditions, the nutrient use efficiencies of P, Ca, and Fe were significantly increased, compared to the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess Mn significantly increased stomatal conductance and transpiration rate in both olive cultivars.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment
excess Mne1
Outcome
stomatal conductance and transpiration ratee1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“olive cultivars ‘Picual’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“excess Mn resulted in a significant increase of stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of both cultivars, whereas the photosynthetic rate was significantly increased only in ‘Koroneiki’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1757–1947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess Mn significantly increased the photosynthetic rate only in Koroneiki.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
Koroneikie1
Treatment
excess Mne1
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“olive cultivars ‘Picual’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“excess Mn resulted in a significant increase of stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of both cultivars, whereas the photosynthetic rate was significantly increased only in ‘Koroneiki’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1757–1947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Picual, photosynthetic rates were similar in both Mn treatments.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
Picuale1
Treatment
Mn treatmentse1
Outcome
photosynthetic ratese1
Direction
similare1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“olive cultivars ‘Picual’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“In ‘Picual’, similar photosynthetic rates were recorded in both Mn treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1949–2026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess Mn did not affect the functional integrity of photosystem II in either cultivar, as measured by chlorophyll fluorescence parameters.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment
excess Mne1
Outcome
functional integrity of photosystem II (PSII)e1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“olive cultivars ‘Picual’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“the functional integrity of photosystem II (PSII) of photosynthesis was not affected due to excess Mn, irrespectively of the cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2134–2267 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the internal tolerance of Koroneiki tissues to excess Mn was higher than that of Picual.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
Koroneikie1
Treatment
excess Mne1
Outcome
internal tolerancee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“olive cultivars ‘Picual’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“the internal tolerance of ‘Koroneiki’ tissues to excess Mn was higher than this of ‘Picual’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2464–2555 · show in text ↑

manganese atom · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

manganese atom · nutrient: content · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

manganese atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.