- lead atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- melatoninResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nitric oxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sodium nitroprussideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- droughtResults differ4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
- botanicalPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- heavy metalPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- infectionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- nanoparticlePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- salinityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- radiationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.