drought · Physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Avena sativa (oats)

Results differ4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ

5 claims from these papers.

Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1

1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect200020052010201520202025
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 3

  1. Effect of Water Stress on Biochemical and Physiological Characteristics of Oat Genotypes · 1998

  2. The involvement of metallothioneins and stress markers in response to osmotic stress in Avena sativa L. · 2023

  3. Glutathione S-transferase in mediating adaptive responses of oats (Avena sativa) to osmotic and cadmium stress: genome-wide analysis · 2025

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1

  1. Effect of Water Stress on Osmotic Adjustment and Antioxidation Ability in Glume of Oat · 2014

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

drought on Avena sativa (oats) against other targets

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes on other organisms