View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Missing data caused only a minor decrease in selection coincidence.
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “missing data only led to a minor decrease in coincidence. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1371 t0 “Maize Hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
The rice silicon model reproduced a gradual decrease in transporter gene expression observed previously.
expression level of the transporter genes e0 gradual decrease e0 previous experimental studies e0 Verbatim
e0 “The model reproduced the gradual decrease and diurnal variation of the expression level of the transporter genes observed by previous experimental studies ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–963 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–35 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
ePE6d precise small edits did not decrease significantly relative to ePE2.
precise edits by ePE6d e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
t0 “rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–64 e0 “a significant decrease in precise edits by ePE6d was not observed throughout the targets ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2001–2089 Other claims from this paper (19) Method / resource Both ePE6c and ePE6d precisely edited rice calli, at average rates of 7.08% and 19.82%. Method / resource ePE6c had 1.83- to 10.12-fold lower small-edit efficiency than ePE2. Method / resource ePE6d generated 11.62- to 580.98-fold more pegRNA scaffold byproducts than ePE2. Method / resource ePE6c HA tag insertion efficiency was 6.87-fold lower than ePE2. Method / resource ePE6d precise HA insertion reached 15.56%, 8.36-fold above ePE2, at ERF141-T. Method / resource ePE6d precise HA insertion reached 14.10%, 2.72-fold above ePE2, at HLH109-T. Method / resource ePE6d precise HA insertion reached 32.15%, 2.65-fold above ePE2, at TubA1-T. Observation Incomplete insertions followed by flanking sequence replicates were the main ePE6d byproducts. Method / resource ePE6d byproducts stayed comparable to ePE2 at HLH109-T and TubA1-T but rose slightly at ERF141-T. Method / resource Precise c-MYC editing efficiency did not significantly differ between ePE2 and ePE6d. Observation Predicted pegRNA extension structure for c-MYC was more disordered than for HA. Method / resource ePE6d induced precise insertions in 20.83% to 70.83% of T0 lines versus 4.17% to 18.75% for ePE2. Method / resource Transgenic byproducts occurred at comparable frequencies of 10.94% with ePE2 and 11.46% with ePE6d. Method / resource ePE6d increased CBP insertion at ERF141-T, HLH109-T and TubA1-T by 2.26-, 5.65- and 7.56-fold, respectively. Method / resource ePE6d improved 3×c-MYC insertion overall by 4.47-fold, reaching 33.84% at ERF141-T. Method / resource ePE6d had higher edit to byproduct ratios than ePE2 in five of six edits. Method / resource Tagged transgenic lines for CBP increased from 7.64% under ePE2 to 50% under ePE6d. Method / resource Tagged transgenic lines for 3×c-MYC increased from 13.89% under ePE2 to 56.94% under ePE6d. Method / resource ePE6d achieved maximal precise editing of 81.25% of T0 lines for CBP at TubA1-T and 66.67% for 3×c-MYC at ERF141-T; three other tags included successful 3×HA and 3×AVI insertion but no intact GB1 insertion. Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Dilution can decrease but not eliminate stoichiometric error.
stoichiometric error e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Some methods (nucleus isolation, dilution) can decrease , but not eliminate, stoichiometric error ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–534 t0 “Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–124 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Nucleus isolation can decrease but not eliminate stoichiometric error.
nucleus isolation e0 stoichiometric error e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Some methods (nucleus isolation, dilution) can decrease , but not eliminate, stoichiometric error ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–534 t0 “Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–124 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Pea nuclei had a greater fluorescence decrease than maize nuclei except in Otto’s buffer.
fluorescence intensity e0 greater decrease e0 With the exception of Otto's buffer e0 Verbatim
e0 “With the exception of Otto's buffer, nuclei of P. sativum and Z. mays were affected differently, with pea nuclei exhibiting a greater decrease in fluorescence in tensity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1842–2011 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Using SNP subsets based on functional annotation did not significantly decrease chickpea grain-yield prediction accuracy.
prediction accuracy for grain yield e0 did not significantly decrease e0 whole SNP dataset e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “Compared with the whole SNP dataset, a subset of SNPs did not significantly decrease prediction accuracy for grain yield despite consisting of a smaller number of SNPs. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1840 e1 “chickpea breeding lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–356 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Sources of Rht-B1b, Rht-D1b and Rht8c alleles that decrease wheat height were identified for selection.
Rht-B1b, Rht-D1b and Rht8c e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “The sources of the Rht-B1b, Rht-D1b and Rht8c alleles, which lead to a decrease in the plant height and can be used in the selection process of wheat, have been identified ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–654 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
HapSolo reduced total contig number.
total number of contigs e0 Verbatim
e0 “The application of HapSolo improved HiC scaffolding, resulting in a decrease in the total number of contigs, higher scaffold N50’s and more continuous genome assemblies. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1956–2125 e1 “genome of avocado ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2225–2242 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The hyperactive mmPing20 version negated the decrease in transposition rate caused by promoter embedding.
a hyperactive version of mPing e1 transposition rate e1 Embedding promoter sequences in mPing e1 Verbatim
e1 “Embedding promoter sequences in mPing resulted in a decrease in overall transposition rate; however, this effect was negated by using a hyperactive version of mPing called mmPing20 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–555 e4 “Expression analysis of a line that contained a heritable in sertion of the mmPing20F activation tag in dicated that the activation tag in duced overexpression of the nearby soybean genes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–892 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays
Oryza sativa
Lathyrus oleraceus
Cicer arietinum
Triticum aestivum
Persea americana
Glycine max