View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Combining neighboring breeding-program subpopulations gave little to no advantage in prediction.
little to no advantage e0 subpopulations that correspond to neighboring breeding programs e0 Verbatim
e0 “little to no advantage to combining subpopulations that correspond to neighboring breeding programs to increase TP size ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1275 t0 “Barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–101 Other claims from this paper (5) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Random mating F2 before selection and inbreeding offers little to no advantage .
little to no advantage of random mating the F 2 before initiating selection and inbreeding e0 Verbatim
e0 “Our results suggest little to no advantage of random mating the F 2 before initiating selection and inbreeding ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–2014 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 Other claims from this paper (8) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Authors infer little advantage of larger effective population sizes for short-term selection.
using larger effective population sizes to maintain genetic variability for short‐term recurrent selection e0 Verbatim
e0 “little to no advantage of using larger effective population sizes to maintain genetic variability for short‐term recurrent selection ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1572 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 Other claims from this paper (8) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude Lr34 provides little or no competitive advantage in the current high-input New Zealand trial system with full fungicide control.
little or no competitive advantage e0 Verbatim
e0 “The high‐yield, high‐input farming environment and the use of full fungicide control in New Zealand's current wheat cultivar trialing system means that genetic sources of rust resistance such as Lr34 provide little or no competitive advantage . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1581 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Parametric models had consistent moderate accuracy.
moderate accuracy e0 within individual years e0 nonparametric models e0 Verbatim
e0 “the consistent moderate accuracy of the parametric models indicates little advantage of using nonparametric models within individual years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1148 t0 “wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–362 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaret0
Zea mays
Triticum aestivum