Refine

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exponential functions offered little advantage over polynomials in model tests.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
little advantagee0
Comparator
polynomialse0

Verbatim

e0

“exponential functions have little advantage over polynomials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–275
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29

Title

Development of a winter wheat adjustable crop calendar model

John Baker NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)

Other claims from this paper (3)
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judge nutrient conditioning of little advantage to transplant growers.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
PNCe0
Outcome
little advantagee0

Verbatim

e0

“PNC offers the transplant grower little advantage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–835
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–116

Title

Cell Size and Pretransplant Nutritional Conditioning Influence Growth and Yield of Transplanted `Jubilee' Watermelon

Charles J. Graham; James T. Payne; Eric J. Molnar HortTechnology 2000. doi:10.21273/horttech.10.1.199

Other claims from this paper (13)
Observationauthor interpretationreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Compounds with little or no selective advantage are discarded.

Taxon
Asteridaeasteridst0
Outcome
discardede0

Verbatim

e0

“Compounds providing little or no selective advantage are discarded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–516
t0

“Asteridae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39

Title

Chemical evolution within the Asteridae

M. Daniel; S. D. Sabnis Journal of Palaeosciences 1992. doi:10.54991/jop.1992.1121

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High density offered little advantage over medium density.

Treatment
high densitye0
Outcome
little advantagee0
Direction
little advantagee0
Comparator
medium densitye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“There was little advantage in favour of the high density when compared with the medium density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–474

Title

A note on the effect of genotype, density and row width on the yield and quality of forage maize

R. H. Phipps The Journal of Agricultural Science 1975. doi:10.1017/s0021859600052795

Other claims from this paper (10)
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixing soil with sediments offered little yield advantage.

Taxon
sudangrassSorghum ×drummondiit0
Outcome
yield advantagee0
Direction
littlee0

Verbatim

e0

“There appeared to be little yield advantage in mixing soil with sediments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1054
t0

“on sudangrass yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–164

Title

Agronomic use of scrubber sludge and soil as amendments to Lake Springfield sediment dredgings

Kenneth R. Olson; Robert L. Jones Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 1987. doi:10.1080/00224561.1987.12456040

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Self-grafting provided little advantage for Cherokee Purple and Crista.

Material
‘Cherokee Purple’ and ‘Crista’e0
Treatment
self-graftinge0
Outcome
advantagee0
Direction
littlee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There was little advantage for self-grafting of ‘Cherokee Purple’ and ‘Crista’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1432
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74

Title

Investigation of Yield and Quality of Grafted Heirloom and Hybrid Tomatoes

Stephen T. Flomo TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University) 2010

Other claims from this paper (12)
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Little advantage is expected from subsoil testing for annual crops.

Taxon
annual cropse2
Outcome
subsoil testinge2
Qualifier
little advantage would be expectede2

Verbatim

e2

“little advantage would be expected from subsoil testing for annual crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–335

Title

The Significance of Subsoil and Soil Series in Nebraska Soil Testing1

R. A. Olson; A. F. Dreier; R. C. Sorensen Agronomy Journal 1958. doi:10.2134/agronj1958.00021962005000040005x

Other claims from this paper (3)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper leaf readings offered little or no advantage.

Organ / stage
upper leavese0
Outcome
advantagee0

Verbatim

e0

“little or no advantage was found for taking CMR from the upper leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1516
t0

“corn leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75

Title

Influence of sulfur deficiency on chlorophyll‐meter readings of corn leaves

Agustín Pagani; Hernán E. Echeverría Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 2012. doi:10.1002/jpln.201100161

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allowing unchopped silage to reach 100°F offered little or no advantage.

Treatment
allowing unchopped silage to heat to 100°Fe0
Outcome
little or no advantagee0
Direction
little or no advantagee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There appeared to be little or no advantage in allowing unchopped silage to heat to 100°F.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–620

Title

THE EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE IN THE MASS ON THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILAGE

J. C. Murdoch; Muriel C. Holdsworth Grass and Forage Science 1960. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1960.tb00186.x

Other claims from this paper (2)
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude mixtures offer little hay yield advantage over alfalfa monocultures.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Interactor
grasse0other
Outcome
little yield advantagee0
Qualifier
when harvested as haye0
Comparator
alfalfa monoculturese0

Verbatim

e0

“alfalfa‐grass mixtures offer little yield advantage over alfalfa monocultures when harvested as hay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1444

Title

Yield Dynamics of Canopy Components in Alfalfa‐Grass Mixtures

G. D. Mooso; W. F. Wedin Agronomy Journal 1990. doi:10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200040010x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.