Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sulfur application increased leaf sulfur concentration.

A claim from Influence of sulfur deficiency on chlorophyll‐meter readings of corn leaves · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application increased leaf sulfur concentration.

Treatment
Sulfur applicatione0
Outcome
leaf S concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfur application significantly increased AB, leaf S concentration, and CMR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–999
t0

“corn leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75

Title

Influence of sulfur deficiency on chlorophyll‐meter readings of corn leaves

Agustín Pagani; Hernán E. Echeverría Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 2012. doi:10.1002/jpln.201100161

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-2ff662b8a773bdc0cc7c15aabc4a43f12b151300b1f586d9fe4ad5916d9cfdb2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

37 papers: 33 positive, 4 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Sulfur fertilization increased sulfur accumulation in all experiments.

    Characterization of Corn Nitrogen Status with a Greenness Index under Different Availability of Sulfur · 2009

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Sulfur fertilization increased apparent sulfur and nitrogen absorption in lambs.

    Effect of Sulfur Fertilization on Chemical Composition, Ensiling Characteristics and Utilization of Corn Silage by Lambs · 1986

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. no effect
    Total N/S ratio in corn R1 leaf and harvested grain was not affected by S addition.

    Does Total Nitrogen/Sulfur Ratio Predict Nitrogen or Sulfur Requirement for Corn? · 2017

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Sulfur deprivation lowered the Fe concentration of the lower leaves of maize on the second day.

    Leaf Responses of Young Iron‐Inefficient Maize Plants to Sulfur Deprivation · 2003

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Sulfur did not appear to increase corn iron uptake.

    Banding of sulfur and sulfuric acid in soil in which iron‐inefficient plants were grown · 1976

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Biofertilizers with low NPK and sulfur gave grain nutrient element content comparable to the positive control.

    Biofertilization of Maize Crop and its Impact on Yield and Grains Nutrient Content under Low Rates of Mineral Fertilizers · 2005 · compared with positive control

    No difference from an alternative

  7. positive
    At 168 or 224 kg N/ha, sulfur fertilization significantly increased corn grain nitrogen content.

    Yield, N, and S Content of Corn as Affected by N and S Fertilization on Coastal Plain Soils1 · 1977

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Mycorrhiza inoculation and sulfur significantly increased grain phosphorus content.

    Improved Nutrient Uptake and Growth of Maize in Response to Inoculation withThiobacillusandMycorrhizaon an Alkaline Soil · 2015

    Same direction

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.