Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sulfur fertilization increased sulfur accumulation in all experiments.

A claim from Characterization of Corn Nitrogen Status with a Greenness Index under Different Availability of Sulfur · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur fertilization increased sulfur accumulation in all experiments.

Treatment
Sulfur fertilizatione0
Outcome
S accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
all experimentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfur fertilization resulted in increased S accumulation in all experiments, and grain yield at Bce II and 9dJ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–983
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24

Title

Characterization of Corn Nitrogen Status with a Greenness Index under Different Availability of Sulfur

Agustín Pagani; Hernán E. Echeverría; Fernando H. Andrade; et al. Agronomy Journal 2009. doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0136

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-0a41dc70840df4e08e614e5fddee8a46ca41cae6949cbb0e112ede28ad856de0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

37 papers: 33 positive, 4 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this claim · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,155 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.