View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Field-vine estimation methods differed by 15% on average.
estimation methods differed e0 Verbatim
e0 “estimation methods differed on average by 15% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1322 t0 “grapevines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–143 Other claims from this paper (12) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Residual sums of squares differed significantly between linear and nonlinear methods .
residual sum of squares e0 linear vs. nonlinear estimation methods e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The differences in residual sum of squares between the linear vs. nonlinear estimation methods , and that between the continuous vs. discontinuous functions, were significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1264 t0 “Root Water Uptake Simulation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–88 e1 “The model calibration and validation were carried out using the data for soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] grown in large soil columns. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–537 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
FAO Penman–Monteith estimates differed significantly from other methods .
each of the other methods e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “significant difference between the FAO Penman–Monteith method and each of the other methods ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–816 e1 “five widely cultivated crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–631 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Critical potassium concentrations differed by plant part and estimation method.
plant parts e0 critical concentrations e0 Verbatim
e0 “The critical concentrations varied between plant parts and among the methods used. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1193 e1 “faba bean ( Vicia faba L. cv. Fiord) and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L. T1587) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–200 Other claims from this paper (12) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
RF estimation accuracy differed significantly across model inputs, unlike the other four models.
accuracy of model estimation e0 significantly different e0 the other four models e0 Verbatim
e0 “The accuracy of model estimation based on RF is significantly different for different model inputs, while the other four models have small differences. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1409 t0 “Cinnamomum camphora
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–116 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The methods differed by 7.5 to 18.6 % in 2014.
Verbatim
e0 “The difference ranged from 7.5 to 18.6 % in 2014 and from 20.8 to 45.8 % in 2015. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1633 e1 “Sphagnum species
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1124 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The methods differed by 20.8 to 45.8 % in 2015.
Verbatim
e0 “The difference ranged from 7.5 to 18.6 % in 2014 and from 20.8 to 45.8 % in 2015. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1633 e1 “Sphagnum species
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1124 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Residual sums of squares differed significantly between continuous and discontinuous functions.
residual sum of squares e0 continuous vs. discontinuous functions e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The differences in residual sum of squares between the linear vs. nonlinear estimation methods , and that between the continuous vs. discontinuous functions, were significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1264 t0 “Root Water Uptake Simulation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–88 e1 “The model calibration and validation were carried out using the data for soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] grown in large soil columns. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–537 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Elemental analysis and combustion methods differed little, with elemental analysis tending to give higher growth cost values.
values calculated from the elemental analysis data e0 Little difference was observed between the two methods e0 heats of combustion data e0 Verbatim
e0 “Little difference was observed between the two methods , but the values calculated from the elemental analysis data tended to be higher than those calculated from the heats of combustion data. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1299 t0 “apple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Satellite and infrared thermometer CWSI estimates differed by less than 3% on average.
satellite-based approach $(CWSI_{sat-based})$ using Landsat 8 satellite images e2 average differences between CWSI estimation methods e0 an established method based on canopy leaf temperature using infrared thermometers (IRT) e1 Brandenburg (Germany) e3 Verbatim
e0 “average differences between CWSI estimation methods were less than 3%, indicating good agreement between both methods ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–688 e1 “an established method based on canopy leaf temperature using infrared thermometers (IRT) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–250 e2 “satellite-based approach $(CWSI_{sat-based})$ using Landsat 8 satellite images ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–436 e3 “commercial apple orchard in Brandenburg (Germany) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–118 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Vitis
Glycine max
Vicia faba_(32109153283).jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Cinnamomum camphora
Sphagnum
Malus domestica