View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The HPLC method showed good repeatability .
Outcomegood repeatability e0 Valuegood repeatability e0 Not reported Material Organ / stage Interactor Treatment Comparator Setting Direction Qualifier
Verbatim
e0 “this method has a good repeatability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–515 t0 “Rumex gmelini ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–33 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The fingerprint method showed good repeatability .
Verbatim
e0 “this method had a good repeatability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–386 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Assay repeatability was 8.5%.
Verbatim
e0 “repeatability 8.5% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–324 t0 “Ornithogalum caudatum Ait ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–55 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The HPLC-RID sugar method showed high repeatability accuracy and effectiveness in accuracy and repeatability tests.
Outcomerepeatability accuracy e2 Verbatim
e0 “a method of extracting soluble sugar from peanut kernel by 80% ethanol and water bath was established ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–379 e2 “The accuracy and repeatability tests showed that this method had high repeatability accuracy and effectiveness ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–616 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Authors judged the method stable and reliable with good repeatability .
Outcomestable and reliable with good repeatability e0 Comparatorgood repeatability e0 Verbatim
e0 “This method is stable and reliable with good repeatability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–725 t0 “Herba Lophatheri ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–44 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The extraction method showed high repeatability , RSD < 5.0%.
Verbatim
t0 “pyrethrum flowers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–67 e0 “high repeatability (RSD < 5.0%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–726 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The repeatability test RSD was 0.634%.
Outcomerepeatability test RSD e0 Verbatim
e0 “repeatability test RSD 0.634% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–592 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The HPLC fingerprint method had good repeatability .
Verbatim
e0 “This chromatographic fingerprint method has good precision, stability, and repeatability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–423 t0 “Cistanche deserticola ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–52 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The HPLC method had good precision and repeatability .
Outcomegood precision and repeatability e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “This method had good precision and repeatability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–755 t0 “Hawthorn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–61 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Inexperienced raters had 0.93 repeatability .
Verbatim
e0 “decreased repeatability (ρc = 0.93) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–863 t0 “lettuce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 Other claims from this paper (13) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.