View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Triticum aestivum ✕
Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A third year without wheat gave no further wild oat density decrease .
Treatmenta third year without wheat e0 Outcomeadditional decrease e0 Directionno additional decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “wild oats in wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 e0 “a third year without wheat gave no additional decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–595 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Marker density as low as 500 did not decrease prediction accuracy.
Outcomeprediction accuracy e0 Directionwithout decreasing e0 Verbatim
e0 “marker density could be as low as 500 without decreasing the prediction accuracy ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1098 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Per-plant productivity decrease d as density in creased in each weed species.
Outcomeproductivity per plant e0 Verbatim
e0 “each weed species by its decrease in productivity per plant as its density in creased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–833 t0 “IN WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–63 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed management treatments decrease d weed density and dry weight.
Treatmentall treatments e0 Outcomeweed density and dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a substantial decrease in weed density and dry weight across all treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1105 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage tended to decrease total weed density and flixweed density early in wheat growth, but not significantly versus traditional tillage.
Second interactorflixweed e0 weed Outcometotal density of weeds and the density of dominant species flixweed e0 Comparatortraditional tillage e0 Verbatim
e0 “No-tillage had a trend of decreasing the total density of weeds and the density of dominant species flixweed at the early stage of wheat growth,but the difference between traditional tillage and no-tillage was not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–452 t0 “wheat field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–43 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Decrease in wheat aphid population density was associated with in creased ladybird and lacewing natural enemy densities.
InteractorSitobion aveanae2 pest Outcomewheat aphid population density e1 Verbatim
e1 “the decreasing of wheat aphid population density was in agreement with in creasing of its natural enemies particularly ladybird, Coccinella septempunctata L., 1758 and common lacewing, Chrysopa carnea (Stephens, 1838) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–564 e2 “population density of wheat aphid, Sitobion aveana (Fabricius, 1775) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–298 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing Bromus rigidus density decrease d wheat productivity.
Outcomewheat productivity e0 Qualifierincreasing grass density e0 Verbatim
e0 “in creasing grass density led to a decrease in wheat productivity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–877 e1 “brome grass (Bromus rigidus Roth) density on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield loss ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–156 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing wheat density decrease d wild oat leaf area in dex and biomass.
TreatmentIncrease in wheat plant density e0 Outcomewild oat LAI and biomass e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In crease in wheat plant density led to decrease in wild oat LAI and biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–676 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At high densities, aphid growth rates did not decline as density in creased in in dividual plots.
Interactoraphid species e1 pest Directiondid not decrease e0 Qualifierincreasing aphid density e0 Verbatim
e0 “the growth rates did not decrease with in creasing aphid density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–672 e1 “aphid species, Metopolophium dirhodum (Walker), Rhopalosiphum padi (L.), and Sitobion avenae (F.), on winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–158 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Strip in tercropping reduced wheat aphid density by 50% relative to monoculture.
Treatmentstrip intercropping e0 Outcomedensities of wheat aphids e0 Verbatim
e0 “We observed a significant reduction in the densities of wheat aphids (50% decrease ) and pollen beetle larvae (20% decrease ) in strip in tercropping areas compared to monocultures. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1096 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.