View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Infection did not decrease photosynthesis in any fifth leaves versus controls.
Organ / stagefifth leaves e0 InteractorErysiphe graminis D.c. ex Merat f. sp. avenae MarchalBlumeria avenae t0 pathogen Outcomerate of photosynthesis e1 Verbatim
e0 “no decrease in any of the fifth leaves relative to controls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–493 e1 “rate of photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–383 t0 “oats exhibiting different levels of partial resistance to Erysiphe graminis D.c. ex Merat f. sp. avenae Marchal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–145 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Infection generally did not decrease photosynthesis , except in second leaves of one genotype.
Organ / stagesecond leaves e0 InteractorErysiphe graminis D.c. ex Merat f. sp. avenae MarchalBlumeria avenae t0 pathogen Outcomerate of photosynthesis e0 Verbatim
e0 “The re was no decrease in the rate of photosynthesis , except in the second leaves of one genotype ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–428 t0 “oats exhibiting different levels of partial resistance to Erysiphe graminis D.c. ex Merat f. sp. avenae Marchal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–145 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Striga infection did not decrease host photosynthesis at 67 or 79 days.
TreatmentS. hermonthica infectione0 Outcomehost photo-synthesis e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “S. hermonthica infection did not decrease host photo-synthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency 67 or 79 DAS. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–484 t0 “Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench host ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–149 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Infection did not change the assimilation versus intercellular CO(2) relation.
TreatmentVerticillium dahliae t0 Outcomerelationship between carbon assimilation rate versus intercellular CO(2) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “no change in the relationship between carbon assimilation rate versus intercellular CO(2) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–326 t0 “Mechanism of Photosynthesis Decrease by Verticillium dahliae in Potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Plantago growth showed no significant repression under Rhinanthus parasitism.
TreatmentParasitism by Rhinanthus e1 Directionno significant repression e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in Plantago , no significant repression of growth was noted. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–827 e1 “Parasitism by Rhinanthus led to a significant decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–698 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Defense gene induction did not differ between mutant and wild type.
Outcomeinduction of genes diagnostic for biotic-stress responses e0 ComparatorXanthomonas citri pv. citrit0 Verbatim
e0 “no difference in the induction of genes diagnostic for biotic-stress responses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1484 t0 “Xanthomonas citri pv. citri, the bacteria responsible for citrus canker ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–71 e1 “leaves infiltrated with the XacPNP deletion mutant show a more pronounced decrease in photosynthetic proteins while no reduction in defense related proteins as compared to the wild-type pathogen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1088 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The XacPNP deletion mutant did not reduce defense proteins relative to wild type.
TreatmentXacPNP deletion mutant e1 Outcomedefense related proteins e0 Comparatorwild-type pathogen e0 Verbatim
e0 “no reduction in defense related proteins as compared to the wild-type pathogen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1088 t0 “Xanthomonas citri pv. citri, the bacteria responsible for citrus canker ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–71 e1 “leaves infiltrated with the XacPNP deletion mutant show a more pronounced decrease in photosynthetic proteins while no reduction in defense related proteins as compared to the wild-type pathogen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1088 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.