View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Triticum aestivum ✕
Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At low versus high sowing density , grain yield in modern wheat cultivars did not decrease significantly.
Materialmodern cultivars e0 Treatmentlow sowing density e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Comparatorhigh sowing density e0 Verbatim
e0 “Compared to high sowing density , in modern cultivars grain yield did not decrease significantly with low sowing density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1024 t0 “common wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Green manure crops gave the greatest soil density decrease , 7-8%.
Verbatim
e0 “The greatest decrease in the soil density (7-8%) was observed in the 0-10 cm layer after green-manure crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–983 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
More recently released cultivars had a progressively smaller ozone related decrease in bulk density .
Outcomerate of decrease in bulk density e0 QualifierAs the release age approaches e0 Not reported Material
Verbatim
e0 “As the release age approaches, the rate of decrease in bulk density diminishes gradually ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1637 t0 “survey of Chinese wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–122 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield tended to decrease above the stated density thresholds.
Treatmentwheat planting density exceeded 450 × 10 4 seedlings ha −1 and 525 × 10 4 seedlings ha −1 e0 Not reported Setting
Verbatim
e0 “when wheat planting density exceeded 450 × 10 4 seedlings ha −1 and 525 × 10 4 seedlings ha −1 , wheat yield tended to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–566 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A third year without wheat gave no further wild oat density decrease .
Treatmenta third year without wheat e0 Outcomeadditional decrease e0 Directionno additional decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “wild oats in wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 e0 “a third year without wheat gave no additional decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–595 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Bulk density under no tillage (NT) could in crease or decrease
Outcomebulk density (BD) e1 Directionincrease or decrease e1 Verbatim
e0 “for winter wheat crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–341 e1 “The results revealed that physical properties such as bulk density (BD) can in crease or decrease under NT, while soil water content (SWC) in creased under the same system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–969 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Marker density as low as 500 did not decrease prediction accuracy.
Outcomeprediction accuracy e0 Directionwithout decreasing e0 Verbatim
e0 “marker density could be as low as 500 without decreasing the prediction accuracy ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1098 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The combined decrease in nitrogen recovery and in crease in planting density decrease d protein content, sedimentation value and wet gluten content of wheat.
Treatmentcombined decrease in nitrogen recovery and increase in planting density e0 Outcomeprotein content, sedimentation value and wet gluten content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t1 “Weak-Gluten Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–175 e0 “The combined decrease in nitrogen recovery and in crease in planting density decrease d protein content, sedimentation value and wet gluten content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2050–2195 Other claims from this paper (13) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease under conservation tillage was mostly attributed to a decrease d ear density .
Treatmentconservation tillage e1 Outcomeyield of spring wheat grain e1 Qualifiera decreased ear density e1 Verbatim
t0 “HEALTH OF SPRING WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–100 e1 “Decrease in the yield of spring wheat grain on plots with conservation tillage, to the highest degree resulted from a decrease d ear density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1055 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Resource complementarity decrease d significantly as wheat and bean density in creased.
Treatmentwheat and bean density e0 Outcomeresource complementarity e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was a significant decrease in resource complementarity with in creasing wheat and bean density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1137 Other claims from this paper (19) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.