View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Row plot yield regressed positively and highly significantly on hill plot yield in barley, showing a strong relationship between the plot types.
hill plot yield e0 Verbatim
t0 “barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 e0 “Regression of row plot yield on hill plot yield was positive and highly significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–641 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Protected plot yield in 2017 was 1032.33 kg/ plot .
Verbatim
e0 “1032.33 kg/ plot yield in protected plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–355 e1 “1032.33 kg/ plot yield in protected plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–355 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Gross plot yield of cocoa exceeded guarded plot yield by about 17%.
gross plot yield e1 guarded plot yield e1 Verbatim
t0 “Edge Effects in a Cocoa Shade and Manurial Experiment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 e1 “the gross plot yield exceeds the guarded plot yield by about 17% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–186 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
T5 yield per plot was 5.15 kg plot −1.
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “yield per plot (5.15 kg plot −1) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1115 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The demonstration plot to farmer plot yield gap was 10.38 percent.
actual farmers plot yield e0 Verbatim
t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 e0 “10.38 percent of yield gap between demonstration plot and actual farmers plot yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1019 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
With straw mulch, total tomato yield per plot was 3.70 kg / plot .
total yield per plot e0 Verbatim
e0 “the total yield per plot was 3.70 kg / plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1366 t0 “TANAMAN TOMAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–35 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect Mulch type significantly affected tomato growth and yield. Intervention effect Straw mulch at 10 t / ha gave better tomato growth rates. Intervention effect Straw mulch at 10 t / ha gave better tomato yields. Observation With straw mulch, tomato height was 34.37 cm at 3 MST. Observation With straw mulch, tomato height was 70.27 cm at 6 MST. Observation With straw mulch, tomato stem diameter was 2.31 mm at 3 weeks. Observation With straw mulch, tomato stem diameter was 2.41 mm at 6 weeks. Observation With straw mulch, the number of tomato branches was 0.60 at 3 MST. Observation With straw mulch, the number of tomato branches was 5.80 pieces at 6 MST. Observation With straw mulch, tomato yield I was 0.93 kg / plot. Observation With straw mulch, tomato yield II was 0.99 kg / plot. Observation With straw mulch, tomato yield III was 1.79 kg / plot. Observation With straw mulch, tomato harvest yield per hectare was 6.17 t / ha. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Maximum plot yield was 3.18 kg/ plot .
Verbatim
e0 “maximum yield kg/ plot 3.18 and minimum 2.14 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1109 t0 “broccoli ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–84 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Minimum plot yield was 2.14 kg/ plot .
Verbatim
e0 “maximum yield kg/ plot 3.18 and minimum 2.14 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1109 t0 “broccoli ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–84 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Rajapuri had maximum fresh rhizome yield per plot of 28.08 kg/ plot .
fresh rhizome yield per plot e0 Verbatim
e0 “fresh rhizome yield per plot (28.08 kg/ plot ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1531 t0 “turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–82 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Treated plot s had higher spike yield (mean 286/ plot ) than untreated plot s (mean 207/ plot ).
untreated plots e1 Verbatim
t0 “Aphelenchoides besseyi in Tuberose
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–75 e0 “the treated plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–597 e1 “higher spike yield (mean 286/ plot ) as compared to untreated plot s (mean 207/ plot ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–778 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaret0
Zea mays
Theobroma cacao
Solanum lycopersicum
Brassica oleracea var. italica_W_IMG_2440.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Curcuma longa
Agave amica
Aphelenchoides besseyi