Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“gross returns”

136 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 29 non-evaluative

Over time

1970 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam gave the highest gross returns, net returns and maximum B:C ratio.

Taxon: pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment: thiamethoxame0
Outcome: gross returns, net returns and maximum B:C ratioe0
Direction: higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“thiamethoxam and imidacloprid recorded highest gross returns, net returns and maximum B:C ratio”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–890

t0
“pomegranate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–25

Title

Management of pomegranate aphid, Aphis punicae (passerini) with new insecticides

D. N. Kambrekar; A. P. Biradar; S. B. Kalaghatagi Indian Journal of Entomology 2013

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Thiamethoxam 25 WG at 0.2 g/l gave the highest reduction in pomegranate aphid population, followed by imidacloprid 70 WG at 0.3 g/l.
Intervention effect In the first year thiamethoxam reduced the aphid population by a mean of 90.19% and 94.10% after the first and second spray.
Intervention effect In the second year thiamethoxam reduced the aphid population by 91.19% and 93.42% after the first and second spray.
Intervention effect In 2010 imidacloprid reduced the aphid population by 87.92% and 90.39% after the first and second spray.
Intervention effect In 2011 imidacloprid reduced the aphid population by 89.73% and 93.42%.
Intervention effect Pomegranate trees sprayed with thiamethoxam gave the highest quantity of marketable fruits, 9105 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Pomegranate trees sprayed with imidacloprid gave the highest quantity of marketable fruits, 9038 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Imidacloprid gave the highest gross returns, net returns and maximum B:C ratio.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid gave the highest gross returns, net returns and maximum B:C ratio.

Taxon: pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment: imidaclopride0
Outcome: gross returns, net returns and maximum B:C ratioe0
Direction: higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“thiamethoxam and imidacloprid recorded highest gross returns, net returns and maximum B:C ratio”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–890

t0
“pomegranate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–25

Title

Management of pomegranate aphid, Aphis punicae (passerini) with new insecticides

D. N. Kambrekar; A. P. Biradar; S. B. Kalaghatagi Indian Journal of Entomology 2013

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Thiamethoxam 25 WG at 0.2 g/l gave the highest reduction in pomegranate aphid population, followed by imidacloprid 70 WG at 0.3 g/l.
Intervention effect In the first year thiamethoxam reduced the aphid population by a mean of 90.19% and 94.10% after the first and second spray.
Intervention effect In the second year thiamethoxam reduced the aphid population by 91.19% and 93.42% after the first and second spray.
Intervention effect In 2010 imidacloprid reduced the aphid population by 87.92% and 90.39% after the first and second spray.
Intervention effect In 2011 imidacloprid reduced the aphid population by 89.73% and 93.42%.
Intervention effect Pomegranate trees sprayed with thiamethoxam gave the highest quantity of marketable fruits, 9105 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Pomegranate trees sprayed with imidacloprid gave the highest quantity of marketable fruits, 9038 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Thiamethoxam gave the highest gross returns, net returns and maximum B:C ratio.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pink polypropylene bagging had the highest gross, net and added returns.

Treatment: Pink polypropylene bagginge0
Outcome: gross returns, net returns and added returnse0
Direction: higheste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Pink polypropylene bagging with highest gross returns, net returns and added returns in all the experiments”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–932

Title

Economic Analysis of Bagging in Litchi Fruit: A Feasibility Estimation from Jammu Region

Varun Pal Singh Economic Affairs 2022. doi:10.46852/0424-2513.1.2022.12

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observation Pink polypropylene bagging had a cost benefit ratio of 1:2.84 after 20 days.
Observation Pink polypropylene bagging had a cost benefit ratio of 1:3.56 after 30 days.
Observation Pink polypropylene bagging had a cost benefit ratio of 1:3.74 after 40 days.
Recommendation The authors recommend promoting litchi cultivation for export.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MTP-I had higher gross returns, net returns and benefit-cost ratio than MTP-II.

Taxon: Melia DubiaMelia dubiat0
Treatment: MTP-Ie0
Outcome: gross returns, net returns and B:C ratioe0
Direction: highere0
Comparator: MTP-IIe0

Verbatim

e0
“MTP-I recorded higher gross returns, net returns and B:C ratio than MTP-II.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–786

t0
“Melia Dubia”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–25

Title

Evaluation of Melia Dubia for its Biomass Production, Carbon Stock, Carbon Sequestration and Economic Returns in Agroforestry System

V. Ishwarya Laxmi; A. Krishna; A. Madhavi Lata; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2021. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2021/v33i1130480

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effect MTP-I had higher volume, biomass production and carbon stock than MTP-II.
Intervention effect MTP-I had higher carbon dioxide sequestration than MTP-II.
Intervention effect Blackgram had higher net returns and benefit-cost ratio than other intercrops.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

spinosad had gross returns of Rs.889100/ha.

Taxon: pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment: spinosade0
Outcome: gross returnse0
Value: Rs.889100/hae0

Verbatim

t0
“pomegranate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–50

e0
“Emamectin benzoate recorded highest mean (gross returns Rs. 908300/ha and mean net returns-Rs.835650/ha) followed by spinosad (gross-Rs.889100/ha and net returns-Rs.811240/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1057

Title

New insecticides for the management of pomegranate fruit borer,Deudorix Isocrates(F.)

D. N. Kambrekar; A. P. Biradar; S. S. Karabhantanal Indian Journal of Entomology 2015. doi:10.5958/0974-8172.2015.00050.4

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Emamectin benzoate gave the highest fruit damage reduction at 3, 7 and 14 days.
Intervention effect emamectin benzoate reduced fruit damage by 93.45 after the first spray in 2010.
Intervention effect emamectin benzoate reduced fruit damage by 96.23% after the second spray in 2010.
Intervention effect emamectin benzoate reduced fruit damage by 92.68 after the first spray in 2011.
Intervention effect emamectin benzoate reduced fruit damage by 96.75% after the second spray in 2011.
Intervention effect spinosad reduced fruit damage by 94.84 after the first spray in 2010.
Intervention effect spinosad reduced fruit damage by 95.50% after the second spray in 2010.
Intervention effect spinosad reduced fruit damage by 92.50 after the first spray in 2011.
Intervention effect spinosad reduced fruit damage by 95.28% after the second spray in 2011.
Intervention effect emamectin benzoate produced 90.83 q/ha marketable fruit yield, statistically on par with the other treatment.
Intervention effect spinosad produced 88.91 q/ha marketable fruit yield, statistically on par with the other treatment.
Observation Emamectin benzoate had gross returns of Rs. 908300/ha.
Observation Emamectin benzoate had net returns of Rs.835650/ha.
Observation spinosad had net returns of Rs.811240/ha.
Observation Emamectin benzoate and spinosad had the maximum benefit cost ratio.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Third crop gross returns were around $15,000 ha-1.

Taxon: guavasPsidium guajavat0
Outcome: gross returnse0
Value: around $15,000 ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0
“Third crop yields give the attractive gross returns of around $15,000 ha-1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–631

t0
“guavas”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58

Title

Growth, yield and preliminary selection of seedling guavas in Queensland

KR Chapman; B Paxton; J Saranah; et al. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 1981. doi:10.1071/ea9810119

Other claims from this paper (14)

Observation Seedling guava yields were comparable with overseas countries.
Observation First-crop mean yield was 30.72 kg/tree after 18 months.
Observation Second-year yield was 45.6 kg/tree.
Observation Third-year yield was 77.9 kg/tree.
Observation First-crop yield equated to 24.7 tonnes ha-1 at 805 trees ha-1.
Observation Second-crop yield equated to 37.2 tonnes ha-1 at 805 trees ha-1.
Observation Third-crop yield equated to 61.5 tonnes ha-1 at 805 trees ha-1.
Observation Seedlines did not differ in annual and accumulated yields, fruit number or fruitfulness indices.
Association Fruit yields and relative butt-area increase varied by cropping year.
Association Fruit number, butt-area-normalized yield and fruit number per kg varied by year.
Association Fruit number per kg varied among seedlines.
Mechanism Water rationing in spring of the second crop year was attributed as the cause of variation.
Observation Four individuals were selected for processing assessment.
Observation Two individuals were selected for fresh-fruit market testing.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate had gross returns of Rs. 908300/ha.

Taxon: pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment: Emamectin benzoatee0
Outcome: gross returnse0
Value: Rs. 908300/hae0

Verbatim

t0
“pomegranate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–50

e0
“Emamectin benzoate recorded highest mean (gross returns Rs. 908300/ha and mean net returns-Rs.835650/ha) followed by spinosad (gross-Rs.889100/ha and net returns-Rs.811240/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1057

Title

New insecticides for the management of pomegranate fruit borer,Deudorix Isocrates(F.)

D. N. Kambrekar; A. P. Biradar; S. S. Karabhantanal Indian Journal of Entomology 2015. doi:10.5958/0974-8172.2015.00050.4

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Emamectin benzoate gave the highest fruit damage reduction at 3, 7 and 14 days.
Intervention effect emamectin benzoate reduced fruit damage by 93.45 after the first spray in 2010.
Intervention effect emamectin benzoate reduced fruit damage by 96.23% after the second spray in 2010.
Intervention effect emamectin benzoate reduced fruit damage by 92.68 after the first spray in 2011.
Intervention effect emamectin benzoate reduced fruit damage by 96.75% after the second spray in 2011.
Intervention effect spinosad reduced fruit damage by 94.84 after the first spray in 2010.
Intervention effect spinosad reduced fruit damage by 95.50% after the second spray in 2010.
Intervention effect spinosad reduced fruit damage by 92.50 after the first spray in 2011.
Intervention effect spinosad reduced fruit damage by 95.28% after the second spray in 2011.
Intervention effect emamectin benzoate produced 90.83 q/ha marketable fruit yield, statistically on par with the other treatment.
Intervention effect spinosad produced 88.91 q/ha marketable fruit yield, statistically on par with the other treatment.
Observation Emamectin benzoate had net returns of Rs.835650/ha.
Observation spinosad had gross returns of Rs.889100/ha.
Observation spinosad had net returns of Rs.811240/ha.
Observation Emamectin benzoate and spinosad had the maximum benefit cost ratio.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 maximized gross and net returns and benefit-cost ratio.

Taxon: custard applet0
Treatment: T7e0
Outcome: gross returns, net returns and Benefit-Cost Ratioe0
Direction: maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“maximum gross returns, net returns and Benefit-Cost Ratio were also recorded maximum in the treatment T7”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–946

t0
“custard apple”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 49–62

Title

Yield, Quality, Soil Parameters and Economics of Custard Apple as Influenced by Organic Inputs

B. R. Patel; B. M. Nandre; P. A. Sable; et al. Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology 2025. doi:10.9734/jabb/2025/v28i103202

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect T7 maximized fruit number, weight and yield.
Intervention effect T7 maximized fruit pulp weight and soluble solids.
Intervention effect T7 maximized fruit sugar measures.
Intervention effect T7 maximized fruit ascorbic acid and acidity.
Intervention effect T7 maximized soil organic carbon and available nutrients.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-W provided maximum gross returns in 2016.

Taxon: pecanCarya illinoinensist0
Material: S-We0
Outcome: maximum gross returnse0
Direction: maximume0
Value: 3629.2 $ ha -1e0

Verbatim

e0
“S-W (3629.2 $ ha -1 ) cropping system provided maximum gross returns in year 2016.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1442

t0
“pecan”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 30–35

Title

DIVERSIFIED CLIMATE RESILIENT PECAN (CARYA ILLINOINENSIS (WANGENH.) K. KOCH) BASED SUSTAINABLE AGROFORESTRY IMPROVES LIVELIHOOD AND RETURNS IN INDIAN HIMALAYA

R.P. YADAV; J.K. BISHT; T. MONDAL; et al. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 2021. doi:10.15666/aeer/1902_13091323

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Wheat equivalent grain yield was 15.06% higher in sole cropping than under pecan.
Intervention effect Production efficiency was 16.3% higher in sole cropping than under pecan.
Intervention effect S-W had significantly higher WEGY than other cropping systems by 4.9 to 51.4%.
Observation S-W was significantly more productive.
Observation Pecan fruit yield in 2016 was 1.11 t ha -1.
Observation Pecan wood in 2016 was 21.31 t ha -1.
Observation Pecan litter fall in 2016 was 8.44 t ha -1.
Observation Pecan C stock in 2016 was 46.50 t ha -1.
Association Crop grain productivity positively correlated with rainfall.
Intervention effect Gross returns were threefold higher under pecan than sole cropping in 2016.
Recommendation The authors concluded pecan agroforestry was more profitable and diversified.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide use protected gross financial returns.

Taxon: hazelnutsCoryluse0
Treatment: fungicide usee0
Interactor: Eastern Filbert Blightt0pathogen
Outcome: gross financial returnse0
Direction: protectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“fungicide use in hazelnuts not only limited EFB development but also protected future yield loss and gross financial returns”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–296

t0
“Eastern Filbert Blight”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–73

Title

Hazelnut Yield Protection Using Fungicides Against Eastern Filbert Blight

Jay W. Pscheidt; John P. Bassinette; Stephanie Heckert; et al. Plant Health Progress 2018. doi:10.1094/php-05-18-0026-rs

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Fungicides limited eastern filbert blight development.
Intervention effect Fungicide use protected future hazelnut yields.
Intervention effect Two fungicide programs did not differ in disease outcome.
Intervention effect Two fungicide programs did not differ in yield.
Recommendation Fungicide costs after EFB discovery are expected to yield monetary benefits several years later through sustained yields.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“gross returns”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics