View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Triticum aestivum ✕
Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Under shading, the percentage decrease in leaf and culm area of spring wheat was lower than the percentage decrease in dry weight .
decreasing percentages of leaf and culm area e1 Verbatim
e0 “field-grown spring wheat (cv. Haruyutaka) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–126 e1 “The decreasing percentages of leaf and culm area, however, were lower compared with those of dry weight s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–976 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shoot dry weight of wheat decrease d with each succeeding delay in seeding date.
delay in seeding date e1 shoot dry weight e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “a decrease in shoot dry weight of both wheat and rye occurred with each succeeding delay in seeding date ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–948 Other claims from this paper (7) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Flag leaf colour loss could indicate the beginning of rapid grain dry weight decline and final grain filling.
used as an indicator of the commencement of rapid decrease in grain dry weight and the final stage of grainfilling e0 Verbatim
e0 “Complete loss of green colour from the flag leaf could therefore be used as an indicator of the commencement of rapid decrease in grain dry weight and the final stage of grainfilling ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1170 e1 “wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–335 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Fast dry matter accumulation made the original weight advantage negligible in simulated canopies.
accumulation in dry matter e6 original weight advantage e6 decrease inferred e6 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat response to CO2 enrichment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32 e6 “The accumulation in dry matter which was fast during that phase made the original weight advantage more and more neglectible ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–883 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in wheat.
supplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiation e0 not significantly decreased e0 control plants that received only solar UV-B radiation e0 Verbatim
e0 “The dry weight s of all 4 species and pea and wheat plant height were not significantly decrease d by a supplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiation from cellulose acetate filtered FS-40 sunlamps for 6 hours each day, relative to control plants that received only solar UV-B radiation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1138 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading to 70% of natural light for three weeks before heading reduced total dry weight to 75% of unshaded plants.
shading (70, 50 and 25% of natural light condition) e1 Total dry weights e3 decrease inferred e3 during three weeks before heading e2 Verbatim
e0 “field-grown spring wheat (cv. Haruyutaka) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–126 e1 “Three levels of shading (70, 50 and 25% of natural light condition) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 e2 “Effect of shading during three weeks before heading ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–346 e3 “Total dry weight s were 75, 52 and 40% of that of unshaded (light intensity=100%) in 70, 50 and 25% light plots, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–784 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading to 50% of natural light for three weeks before heading reduced total dry weight to 52% of unshaded plants.
shading (70, 50 and 25% of natural light condition) e1 Total dry weights e3 decrease inferred e3 during three weeks before heading e2 Verbatim
e0 “field-grown spring wheat (cv. Haruyutaka) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–126 e1 “Three levels of shading (70, 50 and 25% of natural light condition) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 e2 “Effect of shading during three weeks before heading ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–346 e3 “Total dry weight s were 75, 52 and 40% of that of unshaded (light intensity=100%) in 70, 50 and 25% light plots, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–784 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading to 25% of natural light for three weeks before heading reduced total dry weight to 40% of unshaded plants.
shading (70, 50 and 25% of natural light condition) e1 Total dry weights e3 decrease inferred e3 during three weeks before heading e2 Verbatim
e0 “field-grown spring wheat (cv. Haruyutaka) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–126 e1 “Three levels of shading (70, 50 and 25% of natural light condition) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 e2 “Effect of shading during three weeks before heading ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–346 e3 “Total dry weight s were 75, 52 and 40% of that of unshaded (light intensity=100%) in 70, 50 and 25% light plots, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–784 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Three-year-average wheat grain yields were 4.79, 4.79, 4.29, 3.70, 3.20 and 2.40 Mg ha-1 dry weight for grain-only and the 1 February, 6 March, 17 March, 31 March and 13 April grazing termination dates, respectively.
grazing termination dates e1 decrease inferred e0 4.79,4.79,4.29,3.70,3.20, and 2.40 Mg ha e0 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 e0 “grain yields were 4.79,4.79,4.29,3.70,3.20, and 2.40 Mg ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–986 e1 “1 February, 6 March, 17 March, 31 March, and 13 April grazing termination dates, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1110 e2 “An ungrazed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–499 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The critical aluminium toxicity level in Blade 1 was 0.12 mmol kg −1.
critical Al toxicity levels e2 Verbatim
e0 “were 0.12 mmol kg −1 in Blade 1 and 0.08 mmol kg −1 in the whole plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1116 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 e1 “Aluminum is not readily accumulated in Stacy wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–889 e2 “The critical Al toxicity levels, defined as the Al concentration in the tissue associated with a 10% decrease from maximum top dry weight due to toxicity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1044 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivume0