Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“dry weight decrease”

7 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 4 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 4 earlier · 1900s–1920s

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Taxon: wheat ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot dry weight of wheat decreased with each succeeding delay in seeding date.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment: delay in seeding datee1
Outcome: shoot dry weighte1
Direction: decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“a decrease in shoot dry weight of both wheat and rye occurred with each succeeding delay in seeding date”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–948

Title

Date of Seeding, Fall Growth, and Winter Survival of Winter Wheat and Rye

D. B. Fowler Agronomy Journal 1982. doi:10.2134/agronj1982.00021962007400060030x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Rye accumulated shoot dry matter at twice the rate of wheat in fall.
Intervention effect Shoot dry weight of rye decreased with each succeeding delay in seeding date.
Observation The only meaningful winter damage in rye occurred for the last two seeding dates with the cultivar Cougar.
Intervention effect The effect of seeding date on survival of wheat was not consistent among trials.
Intervention effect Average wheat survival was highest for the 15 August and 1 September seeding dates.
Intervention effect Differences in survival among wheat cultivars were not influenced by seeding date.
Method / resource The Field Survival Index can be used to evaluate effects of management practices, in addition to inherent cultivar potential, on winter survival.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf colour loss could indicate the beginning of rapid grain dry weight decline and final grain filling.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Organ / stage: flag leafe0
Outcome: used as an indicator of the commencement of rapid decrease in grain dry weight and the final stage of grainfillinge0

Verbatim

e0
“Complete loss of green colour from the flag leaf could therefore be used as an indicator of the commencement of rapid decrease in grain dry weight and the final stage of grainfilling”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1170

e1
“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–335

Title

Physiological maturity in Aestivum wheat: visual determination

V. P. Singh; M. Singh; M. S. Kairon The Journal of Agricultural Science 1984. doi:10.1017/s0021859600042593

Other claims from this paper (5)

Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Fast dry matter accumulation made the original weight advantage negligible in simulated canopies.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: accumulation in dry mattere6
Outcome: original weight advantagee6
Direction: decreaseinferrede6

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat response to CO2 enrichment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32

e6
“The accumulation in dry matter which was fast during that phase made the original weight advantage more and more neglectible”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–883

Title

Wheat response to CO2 enrichment: CO2 exchanges transpiration and mineral uptakes

M. André; H. Ducloux; C. Richaud NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) 1986

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in wheat.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: supplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiatione0
Outcome: dry weightse0
Direction: not significantly decreasede0
Comparator: control plants that received only solar UV-B radiatione0

Verbatim

e0
“The dry weights of all 4 species and pea and wheat plant height were not significantly decreased by a supplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiation from cellulose acetate filtered FS-40 sunlamps for 6 hours each day, relative to control plants that received only solar UV-B radiation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1138

Title

Effects of Deletion and Enhancement of Ultraviolet-B (280–315nm) Radiation on Plants Grown at 3000 m Elevation1

Michael R. Becwar; Frank D. Moore; Michael J. Burke Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1982. doi:10.21273/jashs.107.5.771

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect UV-B transmitting films produced shorter wheat than UV-B excluding Mylar.
Intervention effect UV-B film treatments did not significantly differ in potato dry weight.
Intervention effect UV-B film treatments did not significantly differ in radish dry weight.
Intervention effect UV-B film treatments did not significantly differ in wheat dry weight.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in pea.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in potato.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in radish.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease pea height.
Intervention effect Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease wheat height.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-year-average wheat grain yields were 4.79, 4.79, 4.29, 3.70, 3.20 and 2.40 Mg ha-1 dry weight for grain-only and the 1 February, 6 March, 17 March, 31 March and 13 April grazing termination dates, respectively.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: grazing termination datese1
Outcome: grain yieldse0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0
Value: 4.79,4.79,4.29,3.70,3.20, and 2.40 Mg hae0
Comparator: ungrazede2

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33

e0
“grain yields were 4.79,4.79,4.29,3.70,3.20, and 2.40 Mg ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–986

e1
“1 February, 6 March, 17 March, 31 March, and 13 April grazing termination dates, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1110

e2
“An ungrazed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–499

Title

Grazing Duration Effects on Wheat Growth and Grain Yield¹

S. R. Winter; E. K. Thompson Agronomy Journal 1987. doi:10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900010023x

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Wheat grazed until 1 February had reduced leaf area index, biomass and mean tiller weight compared with grain-only wheat.
Intervention effect Wheat grazed until 1 February had reduced height and single-seed weight compared with grain-only wheat.
Intervention effect Grain yield, tiller density at heading and harvest index of wheat grazed until 1 February were not reduced compared with grain-only wheat.
Intervention effect Grazing until 6 March or later progressively reduced wheat LAI, biomass and tiller weight.
Intervention effect Grazing until 6 March or later progressively reduced wheat height and single-seed weight.
Intervention effect Heading of wheat was delayed by late grazing.
Intervention effect Wheat tiller density was not reduced unless grazing continued past 31 March.
Intervention effect Wheat harvest index was not reduced unless grazing continued past 17 March.
Mechanism Grazing until 6 March or later appeared to reduce wheat grain yield by limiting leaf area index and biomass in the spring.
Mechanism Removal of spikes by grazing cattle cannot be a primary cause of the loss in wheat grain yield.
Intervention effect Grazing past the period of initial elongation of the first internode delayed internode elongation in wheat.
Observation Growth and grain yield responses of wheat to grazing duration were basically the same across growing seasons.
Observation The grazed wheat did not reach Feekes stage 6 until about 1 April.
Recommendation The delay in reproductive development caused by continued grazing should be considered when grazing termination decisions are based on stage of development.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The critical aluminium toxicity level in Blade 1 was 0.12 mmol kg −1.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: Stacye1
Organ / stage: Blade 1e0
Outcome: critical Al toxicity levelse2
Value: 0.12 mmol kg −1e0

Verbatim

e0
“were 0.12 mmol kg −1 in Blade 1 and 0.08 mmol kg −1 in the whole plant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1116

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69

e1
“Aluminum is not readily accumulated in Stacy wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–889

e2
“The critical Al toxicity levels, defined as the Al concentration in the tissue associated with a 10% decrease from maximum top dry weight due to toxicity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1044

Title

Aluminum Toxicity Effects on Growth and Nutrient Composition in Wheat¹

K. Ohki Agronomy Journal 1985. doi:10.2134/agronj1985.00021962007700060027x

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Aluminium toxicity reduced top and root dry weight, plant height, tillers and top-to-root weight ratio.
Intervention effect Aluminium toxicity reduced tillers and top-to-root dry weight ratio.
Observation Blade and stem aluminium concentrations were low, at most 0.3 mmol kg −1 in Blade 1.
Association Tissue aluminium concentration was linearly related to solution aluminium.
Observation Stacy wheat did not readily accumulate aluminium.
Observation The critical aluminium toxicity level in the whole plant was 0.08 mmol kg −1.
Recommendation Washed Blade 1 was preferred over whole-plant tissue for field diagnosis because it minimizes soil contamination.
Intervention effect Aluminium toxicity decreased all elemental concentrations in Blade 1 and whole plants.
Association Except for P and K in Blade 1, elemental decreases followed linear or quadratic regressions.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The critical aluminium toxicity level in the whole plant was 0.08 mmol kg −1.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: Stacye1
Organ / stage: whole plante0
Outcome: critical Al toxicity levelse2
Value: 0.08 mmol kg −1e0

Verbatim

e0
“were 0.12 mmol kg −1 in Blade 1 and 0.08 mmol kg −1 in the whole plant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1116

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69

e1
“Aluminum is not readily accumulated in Stacy wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–889

e2
“The critical Al toxicity levels, defined as the Al concentration in the tissue associated with a 10% decrease from maximum top dry weight due to toxicity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1044

Title

Aluminum Toxicity Effects on Growth and Nutrient Composition in Wheat¹

K. Ohki Agronomy Journal 1985. doi:10.2134/agronj1985.00021962007700060027x

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Aluminium toxicity reduced top and root dry weight, plant height, tillers and top-to-root weight ratio.
Intervention effect Aluminium toxicity reduced tillers and top-to-root dry weight ratio.
Observation Blade and stem aluminium concentrations were low, at most 0.3 mmol kg −1 in Blade 1.
Association Tissue aluminium concentration was linearly related to solution aluminium.
Observation Stacy wheat did not readily accumulate aluminium.
Observation The critical aluminium toxicity level in Blade 1 was 0.12 mmol kg −1.
Recommendation Washed Blade 1 was preferred over whole-plant tissue for field diagnosis because it minimizes soil contamination.
Intervention effect Aluminium toxicity decreased all elemental concentrations in Blade 1 and whole plants.
Association Except for P and K in Blade 1, elemental decreases followed linear or quadratic regressions.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“dry weight decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics