View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result no effect simulated Claim · model-written summary
Mapmaker and the MCMC method performed similarly without genotyping errors .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the performance is similar between Mapmaker and the MCMC-based method in the absence of genotyping errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–850 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Time since calibration had no significant effect on load prediction errors .
Outcomeload prediction errors e0 Directionnosignificant effect e0 Qualifiertime elapsed since last system calibration e0 Not reported Setting
Verbatim
e0 “the amount of time elapsed since last system calibration had nosignificant effect on load prediction errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1020 t0 “Cotton Yield Mapping ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–80 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cotton moisture content had no significant effect on load prediction errors .
Outcomeload prediction errors e0 Directionnosignificant effect e0 Verbatim
e0 “Average cotton flow rate, cottonmoisture content, and the amount of time elapsed since last system calibration had nosignificant effect on load prediction errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1020 t0 “Cotton Yield Mapping ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–80 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Average cotton flow rate had no significant effect on load prediction errors .
Outcomeload prediction errors e0 Directionnosignificant effect e0 QualifierAverage cotton flow rate e0 Not reported Setting
Verbatim
e0 “Average cotton flow rate, cottonmoisture content, and the amount of time elapsed since last system calibration had nosignificant effect on load prediction errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1020 t0 “Cotton Yield Mapping ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–80 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect simulated Claim · model-written summary
Scoring errors in genotype assessment only slightly affected paternity assessment in Sorbus torminalis .
Treatmentscoring errors in genotype assessment e2 Outcomeassessment of paternity relationships e2 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “wild service tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–716 e2 “scoring errors in genotype assessment only slightly affect the assessment of paternity relationships ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1031 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
For infestations beyond the third larval instar, recognition errors were below 2% for both image sets and did not differ significantly.
Outcomeerrors for both sets of images e0 Directionnot significantly different e0 Qualifiermore advanced than the 3rd larval instar e0 Comparatorboth sets of images e0 Verbatim
t0 “WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 e0 “when considering only infestations more advanced than the 3rd larval instar, errors for both sets of images fell below2% and were not significantly different ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1273 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Embryo-to-seed ratio did not differ significantly between basal taxa and derived groups because the model had large standard errors .
Directionno statistically significant differences e0 Comparatorany derived group e0 Verbatim
e0 “There were no statistically significant differences in E:S between basal taxa and any derived group due to extremely large standard errors produced by GLS models ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1117 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Embryo-to-seed ratios did not differ significantly between basal taxa and derived groups in GLS reconstructions.
Directionno statistically significant differences e0 Qualifierextremely large standard errors e0 Comparatorbasal taxa and any derived group e0 Verbatim
e0 “There were no statistically significant differences in E:S between basal taxa and any derived group due to extremely large standard errors produced by GLS models. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1118 t0 “SEED PLANTS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–65 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Simulated herbicide reductions were not influenced by boom width.
Outcomesimulated herbicide reductions e3 Verbatim
t0 “Patch spraying of weeds in spring cereals ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–41 e3 “The simulated herbicide reductions were not influenced by boom width, but varied significantly between fields, and between threshold levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1139 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
CO2 leakage in an empty chamber was similar to that calculated from the manufacturer equations.
Comparatormanufacturer's equations e0 Verbatim
e0 “In an empty chamber, the measured CO2 leakage was similar to that calculated using the manufacturer's equations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–610 e4 “The magnitude of these errors was assessed in tobacco plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1119 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.