View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under thinning, branch number and foliage per branch contributed nearly equally to foliage biomass in crease.
Verbatim
t0 “lodgepole pine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 e0 “these mechanisms were almost equally important to the in crease in foliage biomass due to thinning ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2281–2378 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry matter was 35% of fresh foliage biomass .
fresh foliage biomass e0 fresh foliage biomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “it was 35% of the fresh foliage biomass and 60% of the fresh woody biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2675–2749 t0 “Black wattle (Acacia mearnsii ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 Other claims from this paper (18) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
With fertilizer, more foliated branches contributed more than foliage per branch to the foliage biomass in crease.
more important e0 Verbatim
t0 “lodgepole pine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 e0 “In creases in the number of foliated branches was more important than in creases in the amount of foliage on a branch when fertilizer was applied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2133–2276 e1 “in creased tree-level foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1522 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage biomass in creased with stem biomass .
Verbatim
e0 “Erica arborea L., Myrtus communis L. and Juniperus communis L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–142 e7 “Foliage biomass in creased with stem biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1192 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed review summary measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage contributed as much or more aboveground biomass than stems in some natural stands.
contribution of foliage to aboveground biomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “the contribution of foliage to aboveground biomass was similar to or even sometimes higher than that of stem. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–773 t0 “Pinus koraiensis
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–73 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage comprised 41% of tree biomass in class 1 western juniper trees.
of tree biomass in class 1 trees e4 Verbatim
t0 “western juniper ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 e4 “Foliage comprised 41% of tree biomass in class 1 trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–897 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Thorns and foliage accounted for 13% of biomass .
Verbatim
e0 “followed by thorns+ foliage (13%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–369 e1 “Bambusa bambos
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–79 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Root and foliage biomass percentages were smaller.
Percentage of root and foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “Percentage of root and foliage were smaller and among different varieties,percentage of stem or twig was the largest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–254 t0 “Bambusa
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–27 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Erica arborea had higher foliage biomass than at the control site at similar stem biomass .
at similar values of stem biomass e7 Verbatim
e7 “E. arborea had higher values of foliage biomass at similar values of stem biomass at the control site ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1295 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Shoot structure along the canopy light gradient affects light in terception efficiency per unit needle area, foliage biomass , or foliage nitrogen.
coniferous forests t0 Shoot structure e0 efficiency of light interception per unit needle area, foliage biomass, or foliage nitrogen e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Shoot structure, as it varies along the light gradient in side canopy, affects the efficiency of light in terception per unit needle area, foliage biomass , or foliage nitrogen. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–283 t0 “coniferous forests ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–69 Other claims from this paper (1) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Pinus contortat0
Acacia mearnsii
Juniperus communis_in_Athens_on_July_4%2C_2023.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Myrtus communis
Erica arborea
Pinus koraiensis
Bambusa bambos
Bambusa