View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Hornbeam had the largest foliage biomass .
Verbatim
e0 “hornbeam had the largest foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–951 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Male foliage biomass exceeded female foliage biomass without a significant difference.
Outcomebiomass value of the male foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “The mean biomass value of the male foliage is greater than that of the females,though this difference is not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1551 t0 “Rhamnus davurica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage biomass scaled with crown woody biomass at exponent 0·78.
Not reported Taxon Direction
Verbatim
e0 “foliage biomass scaled with crown woody biomass with an exponent of 0·78 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1050 t0 “trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
Larix accumulated more foliage biomass regardless of conditions.
Qualifierregardless of conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “regardless of conditions, Larix accumulated more foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–844 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under thinning, branch number and foliage per branch contributed nearly equally to foliage biomass in crease.
Verbatim
t0 “lodgepole pine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 e0 “these mechanisms were almost equally important to the in crease in foliage biomass due to thinning ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2281–2378 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Female shrub foliage biomass was 1.1 times male biomass .
Verbatim
e0 “their average foliage biomass is 1.1 times greater than that of the males ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2199–2272 t0 “Rhamnus davurica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Pine foliage biomass was reduced in dry conditions.
Verbatim
e0 “Pine had reduced foliage biomass in dry conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–687 e1 “subgenus Pinus spp. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–479 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
Pine foliage biomass in creased in moist conditions.
Settingmoist conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “an in crease in foliage biomass was observed in moist conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–761 e1 “subgenus Pinus spp. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–479 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Exocarpos foliage supported greater arthropod biomass than equivalent Acacia foliage .
Outcomearthropods in their foliage e0 ComparatorAcacia foliagee0 Verbatim
e0 “Exocarpos supported abundant arthropods in their foliage – significantly higher in biomass than for equivalent volumes of Acacia foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1513 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage represented 12.58% of dry biomass .
Verbatim
e0 “Cryptomeria japonica trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–126 e1 “12.58% by foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–922 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.