View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Triticum aestivum ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf rust decrease relative water content in wheat by -11.42.
Interactorleaf rust e0 pathogen Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “BREAD WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 e0 “there was -42.92, -23.72, -23.01, and -11.42, % decrease in chlorophyll content , flag leaf area, specific flag leaf area and relative water content in leaf rust (diseased) plot respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–809 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d relative water content across all cultivars.
Treatmentdrought-treated e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 e0 “a decrease in relative water content (RWC) and in crease of malondialdehyde content were observed in drought-treated plants of all cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–697 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect Drought lowered CO2 assimilation and transpiration rate across all cultivars. Observation Drought caused stomata closure across all cultivars. Intervention effect Drought increased malondialdehyde content across all cultivars. Observation The drought-related changes were most pronounced in Ellvis. Observation Soissons retained higher relative water content and CO2 assimilation under drought. Intervention effect Sugars, organic acids, amino acids and sugar alcohols accumulated to higher levels with drought than in controls. Association Several metabolites accumulated differently among genotypes under drought. Intervention effect Drought induced sucrose, malic and oxalic acids in four of six genotypes. Intervention effect Drought induced unknown organic acid 1 and unknown disaccharides 1, 2 and 3 in four of six genotypes. Intervention effect Drought induced GABA, L-threonine and glutamic acid in four of six genotypes. Observation Soissons accumulated the highest amount of unknown disaccharide 5, galactonic and phosphoric acids. Intervention effect Srpanjka increased glucose and fructose under drought. Observation Srpanjka accumulated unidentified sugar alcohols 1 and 2 under drought. Intervention effect In Ellvis, drought decreased Pn, gs and RWC. Intervention effect In Ellvis, drought decreased accumulation of sucrose, glucose and fructose. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under water stress, YS-1L had a smaller decrease in leaf relative water content than other wheat species.
TreatmentStress treatment e0 Directionmuch smaller decrease e0 Comparatorother wheat species e0 Verbatim
e0 “Stress treatment caused a much smaller decrease in the leaf RWC and rise in MDA content in YS-1L compared to the other wheat species. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1417 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d wheat relative water content by 35.57%.
Treatmentstressed conditions e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In the present study with 92 genotypes, a decrease of 35.57% for relative water content and 23.08% was observed for chlorophyll content in the stressed conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1124 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–58 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Chamran under I1 had the smallest relative water content decline relative to I4.
Treatmentdrought stress treatment (I1) e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Directionlowest decrease e0 Comparatorcontrol treatment (I4) e0 Verbatim
t0 “BREAD WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–125 e0 “The Chamran cultivar (C1) on drought stress treatment (I1) had the lowest decrease in relative water content and total chlorophyll content than with control treatment (I4). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1352 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Susceptible cultivars showed lower relative water content and grain yield under drought.
MaterialMarvi, TD-1 and SKD-1 e1 Outcomerelative water contents and grain yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “decrease in relative water content s and grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1022 e1 “Marvi, TD-1 and SKD-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1135 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Root in oculation significantly decrease d wheat relative leaf water content .
TreatmentRoot inoculation e0 InteractorHelminthosporium sativum t0 pathogen Outcomerelative leaf water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Root in oculation showed significant decrease in relative leaf water content , whereas root length and root to shoot ratio were also reduced significantly. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–810 t0 “Helminthosporium sativum in wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–120 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Greater drought in tensity decrease d relative water content .
TreatmentIntensity of drought stress e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Verbatim
t0 “BREAD WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–125 e0 “The results showed that with an in crease in the In tensity of drought stress on wheat cultivars, there was a decrease in relative water content , total chlorophyll content and in creased proline content , but was not observed on trend relating to soluble carbohydrates content . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1179 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water and nitrogen stress noticeably decrease d leaf water potential, osmotic potential and relative water content of wheat.
Treatmentwater and nitrogen stress e2 Outcomeleaf water potential, osmotic potential and relative water content e2 Directionnoticeable decrease e2 Verbatim
e0 “to evaluate the gas exchange, water relations, and water use efficiency (WUE) of wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–134 e2 “The exposure of plants to water and nitrogen stress lead to noticeable decrease in leaf water potential, osmotic potential and relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1154 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content and membrane stability in dex decrease d as salt stress levels in creased in wheat.
Outcomerelative water content and membrane stability index e3 Verbatim
t0 “wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars growing under salt stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–122 e3 “relative water content and membrane stability in dex decrease the value as well as they in creases the stress levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1089 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.