View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Zea mays ✕
Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in maize dry weight was comparable with the decrease in plant height and leaf area.
Outcomedecrease in dry weight e1 Directionno_change inferred e1 Comparatorplant height and leaf area e1 Verbatim
t0 “Maize(Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 e1 “the decrease in dry weight was comparable with plant height and leaf area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1352 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Kernel dry and fresh weight tended to decrease as NAA concentration in creased.
TreatmentNAA concentration e0 Outcomedry weight and fresh weight of the kernel e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “kernel abortion rate tended to in crease with the growth of NAA concentration,but the dry weight and fresh weight of the kernel tended to decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–298 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Root dry weight of chilling-tolerant maize hybrids did not decrease .
Materialmaize hybrids with chilling tolerance e0 Outcomedry weight of root e0 Directiondidn't decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The results show that the dry weight of root of maize hybrids with chilling tolerance didn't decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–469 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Transpiration decrease from FASW 1 under water deficits did not affect maize dry weight until FASW 0.75.
Treatmentwater deficits e1 Directiondid not affect e1 Qualifieruntil FASW = 0.75 e1 Verbatim
t0 “Maize(Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 e1 “the decrease of transpiration from FASW = 1 in response to water deficits did not affect dry weight until FASW = 0.75 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1260 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced plant, ear and kernel dry weight , with the largest reduction in plant dry weight .
TreatmentDrought stress e0 Outcomeplant dry weight,ear dry weight and ear kernel dry weight e0 Qualifierrange of decrease in plant dry weight was obvious e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Drought stress reduced plant dry weight ,ear dry weight and ear kernel dry weight ,and the range of decrease in plant dry weight was obvious compared to ear dry weight and ear kernel dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–807 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
H403 had the greatest shoot dry matter decrease under iron deficiency.
TreatmentFe-deficiency condition e0 Outcomeshoot dry matter weight e0 Directiongreatest decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The greatest decrease in plant height, leaf area, and root and shoot dry matter weight under Fe-deficiency condition was found for H403 hybrid. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–990 t0 “Iron efficiency of different corn hybrids grown in nutrient solution culture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d shoot fresh and dry weight in both maize populations.
Materialpopulation IP3722 e1 Treatmentdrought treatment e0 Outcomeshoot fresh and dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Two populations responded to drought treatment by a significant decrease of shoot fresh and dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–586 e1 “maize plants (population IP3722) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–304 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d seedling fresh and dry weight .
Outcomefresh and dry weight of seedling e0 Verbatim
e0 “significant decrease was observed in germination in dex, seedling vigour in dex, fresh and dry weight of seedling ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–923 t0 “drought stress effects on germination and seedling growth of Zea mays L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–86 t1 “control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–692 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain dry weight declined at every dose and temperature.
Qualifierall doses and storage temperatures evaluated e0 Verbatim
t0 “CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 e0 “Dry weight decrease was observed in all doses and storage temperatures evaluated, but it was more pronounced in those grains that have not received the application of diatomaceous earth. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1245 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
150% more than optimum density decrease d weed dry weight of weeds by 22%
Treatment150% more than optimum density e0 Outcomedry weight of weeds e0 Verbatim
e0 “In crease of density of mungbean from 50% in to 150% more than optimum density, decrease the density and dry weight of weeds, 27.5% and 22%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1306 t0 “corn (Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–101 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.