View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: winter wheat ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Replacing ploughing with cultivating and harrowing significantly decrease d spike density .
Treatmentcultivating and harrowing e0 Outcomespike density per 1 m 2 e0 Verbatim
t0 “WINTER WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–21 e0 “Replacing ploughing with cultivating and harrowing affected a significant decrease in the plant height and spike density per 1 m 2 of winter wheat. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1597 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Asket, Kapitan, Kaprizulya and Lilit had the least decline in productive stand density relative to control under water stress.
Material‘Asket’, ‘Kapitan’, ‘Kaprizulya’ and ‘Lilit’ e0 Outcomedensity of productive stand e0 Directionleast decrease e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “The varieties ‘Asket’, ‘Kapitan’, ‘Kaprizulya’ and ‘Lilit’ showed the least decrease of density of productive stand compared with the control. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–774 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–38 Other claims from this paper (14) Mechanism hypothesis original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing penetrometer resistance with depth was proposed to explain declining wheat root length density with depth.
Outcomerapid decrease in root length density with depth e0 Qualifierincrease in penetrometer resistance with depth e0 Verbatim
e0 “The in crease in penetrometer resistance with depth was a putative explanation for the rapid decrease in root length density with depth. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1217 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fungicide application did not decrease in fection in winter wheat
TreatmentFungicide application e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Fungicide application did not decrease in fection ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1394 e1 “in winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–111 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean reduced soil density by 2,5-3,1%.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The application of soybeen in this plan has caused an average decrease in the productive moisture reserves by 12-18,9%, and a density of 2,5-3,1%, and maize by 24,8-34,2% and 8,7-9,3 %, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1968 t0 “WINTER WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize reduced soil density by 8,7-9,3 %.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The application of soybeen in this plan has caused an average decrease in the productive moisture reserves by 12-18,9%, and a density of 2,5-3,1%, and maize by 24,8-34,2% and 8,7-9,3 %, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1968 t0 “WINTER WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Latest sowing significantly reduced grain yield.
Treatmentlatest sowing date e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–82 e0 “a significant decrease in grain yield was recorded in these plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1790–1855 e1 “latest sowing date ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1762–1780 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Replacing ploughing with cultivating and harrowing significantly decrease d plant height.
Treatmentcultivating and harrowing e0 Verbatim
t0 “WINTER WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–21 e0 “Replacing ploughing with cultivating and harrowing affected a significant decrease in the plant height and spike density per 1 m 2 of winter wheat. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1597 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean reduced productive moisture reserves by 12-18,9%.
Outcomeproductive moisture reserves e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The application of soybeen in this plan has caused an average decrease in the productive moisture reserves by 12-18,9%, and a density of 2,5-3,1%, and maize by 24,8-34,2% and 8,7-9,3 %, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1968 t0 “WINTER WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize reduced productive moisture reserves by 24,8-34,2%.
Outcomeproductive moisture reserves e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The application of soybeen in this plan has caused an average decrease in the productive moisture reserves by 12-18,9%, and a density of 2,5-3,1%, and maize by 24,8-34,2% and 8,7-9,3 %, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1968 t0 “WINTER WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.