View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Organism groups follow NCBI Taxonomy: the spellings of one organism are merged, a claim naming several organisms sits in each group, and claims whose value names no organism are under “not stated”.
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain number per panicle decrease d.
TreatmentLow-temperature at booting t0 Outcomegrain number per panicle e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in the grain number per panicle and 1000- grain weight were also observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1879–1962 t0 “Low-temperature at booting reduces starch content and yield of wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
1000- grain weight decrease d.
TreatmentLow-temperature at booting t0 Outcome1000-grain weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in the grain number per panicle and 1000- grain weight were also observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1879–1962 t0 “Low-temperature at booting reduces starch content and yield of wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Verbatim
e0 “under TR6L increased significantly by 26.05%, 8.22%, 14.05%, 10.50%, 5.09%, and 5.01%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1715 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 e1 “after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039 e2 “grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grain s in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615 e3 “greater decrease in grain weight and average grain -filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grain s (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grain s (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390 e4 “for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt significantly decrease d panicle number and grain number per panicle .
Outcomepanicle number, grain number per panicle e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “salt stress can significantly decrease panicle number, grain number per panicle , 1000- grain weight and yield of rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–450 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Harvest at 21 DAIC decrease d filled and unfilled grain s per panicle , panicle weight and grain yield relative to 7 and 14 DAIC.
Outcomenumber of filled and unfilled grains/panicle, panicle weight and grain yield e0 Comparator7- and 14-DAIC e0 Verbatim
e0 “Delaying the harvest date to 21-DAIC lead to a significant decrease in number of filled and unfilled grain s/ panicle , panicle weight and grain yield compared with 7- and 14-DAIC. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–870 t0 “SOME RICE CULTIVARS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–91 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Under moderate soil salinity, rice grown under AWD had a substantial decrease in number of productive tillers, seeds per panicle and 1000- grain weight .
Outcomenumber of productive tillers, seeds panicle-1, and weight of 1000 grains e1 QualifierUnder a moderate soil salinity level e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “rice cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–87 e1 “Under a moderate soil salinity level, there was a substantial decrease in grain yield (8.2%), number of productive tillers, seeds panicle -1, and weight of 1000 grain s with the plants grown under AWD ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–749 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect Under slight soil salinity, alternate wetting and drying (AWD) and continuous flooding (CF) had a nonsignificant difference in rice grain yield. Intervention effect Under moderate soil salinity, rice grown under AWD had a substantial decrease in grain yield of 8.2%. Intervention effect As soil salinity increased, rice yield reduction was lower with microbial treatment than without microbial treatment. Observation Under AWD at slight soil salinity, rice cultivar Ciherang showed superiority over Inpari 34 and Inpari 35. Observation At the moderate salinity level, the yield reduction of rice cultivar Ciherang was 18.1%, more remarkable than that of Inpari 34 and Inpari 35. Observation At the moderate salinity level, the yield reduction of rice cultivars Inpari 34 and Inpari 35 was 9.7%, smaller than that of Ciherang. Intervention effect AWD used almost one-third less irrigation supplement than continuous flooding (CF) in rice. Intervention effect On average, AWD improved total water productivity of rice by 32.7% over CF under slight soil salinity. Intervention effect On average, AWD improved total water productivity of rice by 20.4% over CF under moderate soil salinity. Recommendation The authors propose that small farmers in slight-salinity lowland areas of the northern coast of Java could apply AWD during the dry season. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Aphid infestation decrease d grain weight per panicle of sorghum.
TreatmentAphid infestation e1 Outcomegrain weight per panicle e1 Directiondecrease inferred e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Sorghum genotypes with potential resistance to the aphid Melanaphis sorghi ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 e1 “Aphid infestation primarily reduced the plant fresh weight of the plant and grain size, negatively affecting grain weight per panicle ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1123 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed sowing decrease d panicle weight by 16.84%.
TreatmentDelayed sowing e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Delayed sowing also resulted in a decrease in plant height (66.4 cm), 100 grain weight (8.3%), panicle weight (16.84%) and grain yield per plant (18.93%). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–842 t0 “Sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed sowing decrease d grain yield per plant by 18.93%.
TreatmentDelayed sowing e0 Outcomegrain yield per plant e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Delayed sowing also resulted in a decrease in plant height (66.4 cm), 100 grain weight (8.3%), panicle weight (16.84%) and grain yield per plant (18.93%). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–842 t0 “Sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
TCB stress reduced panicle s per hill, spikelets per panicle and grain filling per centage in japonica rice.
Outcomenumber of panicles per hill, the number of spikelets per panicle, the grain filling percentage e4 Verbatim
t0 “japonica rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 e4 “TCB stress reduces the yield of japonica rice by reducing the number of panicle s per hill, the number of spikelets per panicle , the grain filling per centage, and the grain weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1156 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
TCB stress reduced grain weight in japonica rice.
Verbatim
t0 “japonica rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 e4 “TCB stress reduces the yield of japonica rice by reducing the number of panicle s per hill, the number of spikelets per panicle , the grain filling per centage, and the grain weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1156 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
TCB stress reduced the yield of japonica rice.
Verbatim
t0 “japonica rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 e4 “TCB stress reduces the yield of japonica rice by reducing the number of panicle s per hill, the number of spikelets per panicle , the grain filling per centage, and the grain weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1156 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
grain weight per the panicle was decrease in relation to Crowdedness of crop (by 20 thousand/ha).
TreatmentCrowdedness of crop (by 20 thousand/ha) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Crowdedness of crop (by 20 thousand/ha) led to a decrease in this indicator by 4.8–22.0 % compared to the previous one. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–727 t0 “grain sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 Other claims from this paper (17) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.