Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in relative water content”

6 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

1990 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Organism: Medicago sativa ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-stressed alfalfa plants showed a significant decrease in relative water content of 7.45%.

Taxon: alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment: drought-stressede0
Outcome: relative water contente0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 7.45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“In drought-stressed alfalfa plants, we observed a significant decrease in the relative water content (7.45%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1057

Title

Phosphate-Solubilizing Enterobacter ludwigii AFFR02 and Bacillus megaterium Mj1212 Rescues Alfalfa’s Growth under Post-Drought Stress

Sang-Mo Kang; Muhammad-Aaqil Khan; Muhammad Hamayun; et al. Agriculture 2021. doi:10.3390/agriculture11060485

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Drought stress decreased alfalfa shoot length by 24.88%.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased alfalfa root length by 29.62%.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased alfalfa shoot fresh weight by 49.62%.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased alfalfa root fresh weight by 45.09%.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased alfalfa stalk diameter by 52.84%.
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased alfalfa chlorophyll content by 19.2%.
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation significantly recovered alfalfa shoot length by 12.42% under drought stress.
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation significantly recovered alfalfa root length by 21.30% under drought stress.
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation significantly recovered alfalfa shoot fresh weight by 50.74% under drought stress.
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation significantly recovered alfalfa root fresh weight by 46.42% under drought stress.
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation significantly recovered alfalfa stalk diameter by 76.72% under drought stress.
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation significantly recovered alfalfa chlorophyll content by 17.98% under drought stress.
Intervention effect Drought-stressed alfalfa plants showed an increase in electrical conductivity of 68.87%.
Intervention effect Drought-stressed alfalfa plants showed an increase in abscisic acid contents of 164.42%.
Intervention effect Total phenolic content (46.08%) and DPPH-scavenging activity (39.66%) increased significantly in alfalfa treated with drought stress and the bacterial isolates.
Intervention effect Total flavonoid (13.68%) and superoxide dismutase (28.51%) increased in alfalfa treated with drought stress and the bacterial isolates.
Intervention effect Potassium (17.98%) and phosphorous (11.14%) increased in bacteria-inoculated alfalfa plants under drought stress.
Intervention effect Calcium (3.07%) and magnesium (6.71%) increased in bacteria-inoculated alfalfa plants under drought stress.
Recommendation The authors propose that the isolates could be used as potential candidates in smart-climate agricultural practices in drought-stricken areas.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress decreased relative water content.

Taxon: ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment: water stresse0
Outcome: relative water contente0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The results obtained showed that the effects of water stress are manifested by a decrease in the relative water content”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–365

t0
“ALFALFA”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55

Title

EFFECT OF WATER STRESS ON RHIZOBIA SYMBIOSIS IN ALFALFA (MEDICAGO SATIVA L.)

Ahlem Mouffok; M. Belhamra Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences 2020. doi:10.4314/jfas.v12i1.17

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Water stress negatively affected vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Water stress negatively affected symbiotic nitrogen fixation.
Association Varietal responses differed by stress severity.
Observation Diamant was among the most tolerant varieties across water deficit levels.
Observation Baldia was among the most tolerant varieties across water deficit levels.
Observation Dista showed significant sensitivity to water deficit.
Observation Moapa showed significant sensitivity to water deficit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated wastewater slightly decreased alfalfa forage protein content relative to normal water.

Taxon: alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment: irrigation with treated wastewatere0
Outcome: proteine0
Direction: slight decreasee0
Comparator: plants irrigated with normal watere0

Verbatim

e0
“irrigation with treated wastewater did not show any adverse effects on forage quality of alfalfa plants with slight decrease in protein and fat contents in comparison with plants irrigated with normal water”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1185

Title

Changes in Yield and Forage Quality of Six Alfalfa Cultivars in Response to Sustainable Irrigation with Treated Wastewater

Walid Soufan; Nasser Al-Suhaibani; Peter Tillmann; et al. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2020. doi:10.17957/ijab/15.1561

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Treated wastewater did not adversely affect alfalfa productivity across cultivars and seasons.
Intervention effect Treated wastewater did not adversely affect overall alfalfa forage quality.
Intervention effect Treated wastewater slightly decreased alfalfa forage fat content relative to normal water.
Recommendation The authors conclude that alfalfa forage can be grown with treated wastewater.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated wastewater slightly decreased alfalfa forage fat content relative to normal water.

Taxon: alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment: irrigation with treated wastewatere0
Outcome: fat contentse0
Direction: slight decreasee0
Comparator: plants irrigated with normal watere0

Verbatim

e0
“irrigation with treated wastewater did not show any adverse effects on forage quality of alfalfa plants with slight decrease in protein and fat contents in comparison with plants irrigated with normal water”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1185

Title

Changes in Yield and Forage Quality of Six Alfalfa Cultivars in Response to Sustainable Irrigation with Treated Wastewater

Walid Soufan; Nasser Al-Suhaibani; Peter Tillmann; et al. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2020. doi:10.17957/ijab/15.1561

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Treated wastewater did not adversely affect alfalfa productivity across cultivars and seasons.
Intervention effect Treated wastewater did not adversely affect overall alfalfa forage quality.
Intervention effect Treated wastewater slightly decreased alfalfa forage protein content relative to normal water.
Recommendation The authors conclude that alfalfa forage can be grown with treated wastewater.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress negatively affected vegetative growth.

Taxon: ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment: water stresse0
Outcome: vegetative growthe0
Direction: negatively affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“water stress are manifested by a decrease in the relative water content and negatively affect vegetative growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–405

t0
“ALFALFA”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55

Title

EFFECT OF WATER STRESS ON RHIZOBIA SYMBIOSIS IN ALFALFA (MEDICAGO SATIVA L.)

Ahlem Mouffok; M. Belhamra Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences 2020. doi:10.4314/jfas.v12i1.17

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Water stress decreased relative water content.
Intervention effect Water stress negatively affected symbiotic nitrogen fixation.
Association Varietal responses differed by stress severity.
Observation Diamant was among the most tolerant varieties across water deficit levels.
Observation Baldia was among the most tolerant varieties across water deficit levels.
Observation Dista showed significant sensitivity to water deficit.
Observation Moapa showed significant sensitivity to water deficit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress negatively affected symbiotic nitrogen fixation.

Taxon: ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment: water stresse0
Interactor: RHIZOBIAt0symbiont
Outcome: symbiotic nitrogen fixatione0
Direction: negatively affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“water stress are manifested by a decrease in the relative water content and negatively affect vegetative growth as well as the symbiotic nitrogen fixation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–448

t0
“WATER STRESS ON RHIZOBIA SYMBIOSIS IN ALFALFA”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–55

Title

EFFECT OF WATER STRESS ON RHIZOBIA SYMBIOSIS IN ALFALFA (MEDICAGO SATIVA L.)

Ahlem Mouffok; M. Belhamra Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences 2020. doi:10.4314/jfas.v12i1.17

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Water stress decreased relative water content.
Intervention effect Water stress negatively affected vegetative growth.
Association Varietal responses differed by stress severity.
Observation Diamant was among the most tolerant varieties across water deficit levels.
Observation Baldia was among the most tolerant varieties across water deficit levels.
Observation Dista showed significant sensitivity to water deficit.
Observation Moapa showed significant sensitivity to water deficit.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in relative water content”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics