View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Zea mays ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Osmotic stress decrease d seedling relative water content .
Treatmentosmotic stress t0 Outcomeseedling relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in seedling relative water content (RWC) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1153 t0 “osmotic stress resistance by improving leaf photosynthetic physiology and antioxidant capacity in maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–144 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content decrease d slightly without significant differences.
OutcomeLeaf relative water content e0 Qualifieroverall decrease in relative water content was small e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Leaf relative water content and SPAD values also decrease d, but the overall decrease in relative water content was small, and the differences were not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–1002 t0 “Cd Stress on Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Maize Seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–90 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress decrease d relative water content and in creased water deficit in dex in all genotypes.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Salt stress led to physiological drought in all maize genotypes as in dicated by the significant decrease in relative water content and in crease in water deficit in dex. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–604 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shoot relative water content fell 28.65% versus control.
Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
t0 “MAIZE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 e0 “There is a significant decrease in relative water content (RWC) in both shoot and root by 28.65% and 11.13%, respectively, compared with the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1206 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Root relative water content fell 11.13% versus control.
Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
t0 “MAIZE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 e0 “There is a significant decrease in relative water content (RWC) in both shoot and root by 28.65% and 11.13%, respectively, compared with the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1206 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In maize under elevated CO2, leaf relative water content starts to decrease at a lower FTSW threshold than in wheat (0.21 vs 0.43).
Outcomeleaf relative water content e6 Directionstarts to decrease e6 Verbatim
e5 “After onset of progressive soil drying, maize plants in e[CO 2 ] showed lower FTSW thresholds than wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–899 e6 “at which e.g. g s (0.31 vs 0.40) and leaf relative water content (0.21 vs 0.43) starts to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–999 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 increased the net photosynthetic rate only in wheat. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 increased dry matter accumulation in wheat and maize. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 decreased stomatal conductance and water consumption. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 enhanced WUE by 27.82% in maize. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 enhanced WUE by 49.86% in wheat. Association After onset of progressive soil drying, maize under elevated CO2 showed lower FTSW thresholds than wheat. Association In maize under elevated CO2, stomatal conductance starts to decrease at a lower FTSW threshold than in wheat (0.31 vs 0.40). Association The authors interpret elevated CO2 as conferring greater drought resistance in maize. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, enhanced WUE was found only in wheat. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, DMA increased in wheat. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, water consumption was unaffected in wheat. Recommendation The authors recommend developing specific water management strategies to optimize crop WUE for different species under future drier, CO2-enriched conditions. Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress decrease d maize leaf relative water content , photosynthetic characteristics and catalase activity.
Treatmentsalt stress treatments e0 Outcomeleaf relative water content, photosynthetic characteristics, and catalase activity e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the leaf relative water content , photosynthetic characteristics, and catalase activity exhibited a significantly decrease of salt stress treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–532 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Longer irrigation cycles decrease d ear leaf area and relative water content .
Treatmentincreasing irrigation cycle e0 Outcomeear leaf area and relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “by in creasing irrigation cycle and as a result decreasing water using in four levels of irrigation, traits like forage yield, ear weight, plant height, stem and leaf weight, ear leaf area and relative water content have decrease in treatment according to decrease in water used. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1240 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–64 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Combined As+PEG stress decrease d relative water content of maize seedlings by 35%.
Treatmentcombined As+PEG stress e2 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “the relative growth rate (RGR) of maize seedlings under As and drought stress was reduced by 38 % and 50 %, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–756 e2 “with a 35 % decrease in relative water content (RWC) under combined As+PEG stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–839 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Brassinolide decrease d MDA content by 24% relative to distilled water -sprayed plants.
Comparatordistilled water-sprayed plants e5 Verbatim
t0 “Brassinolide Alleviates Maize Silk Growth Under Water Deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 e1 “then applied foliar BR at concentrations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–389 e5 “with distilled water -sprayed plants serving as controls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–475 e2 “a 24% decrease in MDA content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1068 Other claims from this paper (17) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.