Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease of grain weight per panicle”

14 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt significantly decreased panicle number and grain number per panicle.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Treatment: salt stresse0
Outcome: panicle number, grain number per paniclee0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“salt stress can significantly decrease panicle number, grain number per panicle, 1000-grain weight and yield of rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–450

Title

Study on the Effect of Salt Stress on Yield and Grain Quality Among Different Rice Varieties

Rui Zhang; Yang Wang; Shahid Hussain; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2022. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.918460

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Salt significantly decreased 1000-grain weight and rice yield.
Mechanism Panicle number was a main cause of yield loss under saline conditions.
Intervention effect Salt below 34.2 mM NaCl increased brown and milled rice rates.
Intervention effect Salt below 34.2 mM NaCl significantly increased head milled rice rate in salt-sensitive varieties.
Intervention effect Salt below 34.2 mM NaCl decreased head milled rice rate in salt-tolerant varieties.
Intervention effect Grain length was more sensitive to salt than grain width.
Observation Salt tolerance ranked Xudao9, Huageng5, then Yangyugeng2.
Intervention effect Low salt increased appearance, viscosity and balance in Yangyugeng2.
Intervention effect Low salt increased appearance, viscosity and balance in Huageng5.
Intervention effect Low salt increased appearance, viscosity and balance in Xudao9.
Intervention effect Low salt increased taste value in Yangyugeng2.
Intervention effect Low salt increased taste value in Huageng5.
Intervention effect Low salt increased taste value in Xudao9.
Intervention effect Low salt decreased hardness in Yangyugeng2.
Intervention effect Low salt decreased hardness in Huageng5.
Intervention effect Low salt decreased hardness in Xudao9.
Observation Varietal starch pasting differences exceeded salt-induced differences; seed K, Mg, P, S and Cu uptake also varied significantly among varieties.
Intervention effect Salt significantly altered seed uptake of K, Na and Cu ions.
Recommendation The authors recommend salt-tolerant rice for mudflat utilization and conclude low salt improves quality.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest at 21 DAIC decreased filled and unfilled grains per panicle, panicle weight and grain yield relative to 7 and 14 DAIC.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: 21-DAICe0
Outcome: number of filled and unfilled grains/panicle, panicle weight and grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: 7- and 14-DAICe0

Verbatim

e0
“Delaying the harvest date to 21-DAIC lead to a significant decrease in number of filled and unfilled grains/panicle, panicle weight and grain yield compared with 7- and 14-DAIC.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–870

t0
“SOME RICE CULTIVARS”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–91

Title

EFFECT OF HARVESTING TIME ON GRAIN YIELD AND QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME RICE CULTIVARS AT DIFFERENT STORAGE PERIODS

Samah M. Aamer; A. S. Gharieb; Hasnaa, A. Ghazy Menoufia Journal of Plant Production 2021. doi:10.21608/mjppf.2021.186850

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Harvest at 21 DAIC increased thousand-grain weight relative to earlier harvest.
Observation Sakha 108 was superior to Sakha 106 and Sakha 107 in grain yield and its attributes.
Observation Sakha 108 at 14 DAIC gave the highest grain yield.
Intervention effect Longer storage reduced moisture content, hulling and milling percentages.
Intervention effect Longer storage reduced head-rice percentage.
Intervention effect Longer storage increased amylose and elongation percentages and gelatinization temperature.
Observation Harvest at 14 DAIC had the highest values of all grain quality characteristics.
Observation Sakha 108 had the lowest grain moisture content.
Observation Sakha 108 had the highest values of other grain quality traits.
Observation Sakha 108 harvested at 14 DAIC achieved the highest grain yield at nine months of storage.
Observation Sakha 108 harvested at 14 DAIC achieved the highest grain quality at nine months of storage.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt significantly decreased 1000-grain weight and rice yield.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Treatment: salt stresse0
Outcome: 1000-grain weight and yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“salt stress can significantly decrease panicle number, grain number per panicle, 1000-grain weight and yield of rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–450

Title

Study on the Effect of Salt Stress on Yield and Grain Quality Among Different Rice Varieties

Rui Zhang; Yang Wang; Shahid Hussain; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2022. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.918460

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Salt significantly decreased panicle number and grain number per panicle.
Mechanism Panicle number was a main cause of yield loss under saline conditions.
Intervention effect Salt below 34.2 mM NaCl increased brown and milled rice rates.
Intervention effect Salt below 34.2 mM NaCl significantly increased head milled rice rate in salt-sensitive varieties.
Intervention effect Salt below 34.2 mM NaCl decreased head milled rice rate in salt-tolerant varieties.
Intervention effect Grain length was more sensitive to salt than grain width.
Observation Salt tolerance ranked Xudao9, Huageng5, then Yangyugeng2.
Intervention effect Low salt increased appearance, viscosity and balance in Yangyugeng2.
Intervention effect Low salt increased appearance, viscosity and balance in Huageng5.
Intervention effect Low salt increased appearance, viscosity and balance in Xudao9.
Intervention effect Low salt increased taste value in Yangyugeng2.
Intervention effect Low salt increased taste value in Huageng5.
Intervention effect Low salt increased taste value in Xudao9.
Intervention effect Low salt decreased hardness in Yangyugeng2.
Intervention effect Low salt decreased hardness in Huageng5.
Intervention effect Low salt decreased hardness in Xudao9.
Observation Varietal starch pasting differences exceeded salt-induced differences; seed K, Mg, P, S and Cu uptake also varied significantly among varieties.
Intervention effect Salt significantly altered seed uptake of K, Na and Cu ions.
Recommendation The authors recommend salt-tolerant rice for mudflat utilization and conclude low salt improves quality.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Superior spikelets of NIL-GNP1TQ had significantly lower grain weight and grain size than Lemont.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Material: NIL-GNP1TQe0
Organ / stage: superior spikeletse0
Outcome: grain weighte0
Direction: decreasede0
Qualifier: significant decrease of grain sizee0

Verbatim

e0
“significantly decreased grain weight of superior spikelets (SS) in NIL-GNP1TQ was ascribed to a significant decrease of grain size”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1121

t0
“Rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95

Title

Pleiotropic Effect of GNP1 Underlying Grain Number per Panicle on Sink, Source and Flow in Rice

Laiyuan Zhai; Feng Wang; An Yan; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2020. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00933

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6Le0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weight per paniclee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: increasede0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 26.05%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“under TR6L increased significantly by 26.05%, 8.22%, 14.05%, 10.50%, 5.09%, and 5.01%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1715

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS44e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6Le0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weight per paniclee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: increasede0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 8.22%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“under TR6L increased significantly by 26.05%, 8.22%, 14.05%, 10.50%, 5.09%, and 5.01%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1715

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6Se0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weight per paniclee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: increasede0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 20.78%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“under TR6S, they significantly increased by 20.78%, 9.91%, 16.19%, 9.28%, 5.01%, and 4.14%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1825

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS44e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6Se0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weight per paniclee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: increasede0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 9.91%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“under TR6S, they significantly increased by 20.78%, 9.91%, 16.19%, 9.28%, 5.01%, and 4.14%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1825

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6Le0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: AGFRe0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: increasede0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 14.05%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“under TR6L increased significantly by 26.05%, 8.22%, 14.05%, 10.50%, 5.09%, and 5.01%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1715

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS44e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6Le0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: AGFRe0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: increasede0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 10.50%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“under TR6L increased significantly by 26.05%, 8.22%, 14.05%, 10.50%, 5.09%, and 5.01%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1715

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease of grain weight per panicle”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics