View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree height repeatability exceeded diameter repeatability at all sites.
Verbatim
e0 “the repeatability and heritability of tree height were greater than those of DBH at all sites ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–616 e1 “Populus deltoides ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–56 Other claims from this paper (12) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Simplified AmpSeq showed high repeatability .
Valuehigh repeatability e0 Not reported Taxon Material Gene Compound Organ / stage Interactor Interactor role Second interactor Second interactor role Treatment Comparator Setting Direction Qualifier
Verbatim
e0 “Simplified AmpSeq has the advantages of high repeatability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1118 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The HPLC-RID sugar method showed high repeatability accuracy and effectiveness in accuracy and repeatability tests.
Outcomerepeatability accuracy e2 Verbatim
e0 “a method of extracting soluble sugar from peanut kernel by 80% ethanol and water bath was established ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–379 e2 “The accuracy and repeatability tests showed that this method had high repeatability accuracy and effectiveness ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–616 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The analytical method had repeatability below 12%.
Verbatim
t0 “from aged garlic ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–82 e6 “appropriate repeatability (< 12%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–665 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability for fruit number was estimated at 9.00%.
Qualifiersame characters e0 Verbatim
e0 “the repeatability ranged from 9.00 to 42.06% for the same characters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–871 t0 “strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability for average fruit mass was estimated at 42.06%.
Qualifiersame characters e0 Verbatim
e0 “the repeatability ranged from 9.00 to 42.06% for the same characters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–871 t0 “strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability coefficients for strawberry production and quality traits ranged from low to medium.
Outcomerepeatability coefficients e0 Comparatorlow to medium e0 Verbatim
t0 “strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 e0 “The repeatability coefficients ranged from low to medium. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1077 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Fruit weight had the highest repeatability among production characters.
Verbatim
e0 “the fruit weight, the character with the highest repeatability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1006 t0 “strawberry cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–116 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability was 0.53.
Verbatim
e0 “repeatability (0.53) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–488 t0 “elephant grass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Assay repeatability was 99%.
Verbatim
e0 “Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed at 99% and 93%, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1536 e1 “grapevines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–567 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.