View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: safflower ✕
A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit significantly decrease d relative water content , stomatal conductance, and osmotic adjustment.
Treatmentwater deficits e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC), stomatal conductance (gs), osmotic adjustment (Oadj) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–69 e0 “water deficits led to a significant decrease in relative water content (RWC), stomatal conductance (gs), osmotic adjustment (Oadj) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–607 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
S1 decrease d leaf relative water content by 17%.
TreatmentS1 irrigation level e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) of the leaf e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 e0 “The S1 irrigation level led to a decrease in Fv/Fm (5 %), relative water content (RWC) of the leaf (17 %) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–615 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower plant height, leaf area in dex, and relative water content .
Treatmentsalinity, drought, and simultaneous stresses e0 Outcomeplant height, leaf area index, relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The plant height, leaf area in dex, relative water content , number of heads per plant, number of seeds per head, 1000-seeds weight, seed yield, oil content , net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate decrease under salinity, drought, and simultaneous stresses. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–801 t0 “safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower head number, seed number per head, and thousand-seed weight. Intervention effect Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower seed yield and oil content. Intervention effect Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate. Intervention effect The 10 dS m -1 salinity and 40% irrigation treatment reduced safflower seed yield by 92.6% at heading. Intervention effect The same stress treatment reduced safflower seed yield by 71.04% at stem elongation. Intervention effect The same stress treatment reduced safflower seed yield by 89.9% at flowering. Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit significantly decrease d relative water content , stomatal conductance, and osmotic adjustment.
Treatmentwater deficits e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC), stomatal conductance (gs), osmotic adjustment (Oadj) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–69 e0 “water deficits led to a significant decrease in relative water content (RWC), stomatal conductance (gs), osmotic adjustment (Oadj) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–607 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
S1 decrease d leaf relative water content by 17%.
TreatmentS1 irrigation level e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) of the leaf e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 e0 “The S1 irrigation level led to a decrease in Fv/Fm (5 %), relative water content (RWC) of the leaf (17 %) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–615 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower plant height, leaf area in dex, and relative water content .
Treatmentsalinity, drought, and simultaneous stresses e0 Outcomeplant height, leaf area index, relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The plant height, leaf area in dex, relative water content , number of heads per plant, number of seeds per head, 1000-seeds weight, seed yield, oil content , net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate decrease under salinity, drought, and simultaneous stresses. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–801 t0 “safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower head number, seed number per head, and thousand-seed weight. Intervention effect Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower seed yield and oil content. Intervention effect Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate. Intervention effect The 10 dS m -1 salinity and 40% irrigation treatment reduced safflower seed yield by 92.6% at heading. Intervention effect The same stress treatment reduced safflower seed yield by 71.04% at stem elongation. Intervention effect The same stress treatment reduced safflower seed yield by 89.9% at flowering. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.