View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Processing time decreased by 10 ms.
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “processing time was reduced by 10 ms ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1116 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Algorithm processing time met real- time tea picking requirements.
real-time requirements e0 Verbatim
e0 “the processing time of the algorithm met the real- time requirements for effective tea-picking operations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1373 t0 “Tea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Processing can be controlled by shaft speed and processing time .
Processing can be controlled e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “Processing can be controlled by varying shaft rotation speed and processing time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–611 t0 “Prairie Grasses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The computer procedure increased processing time .
time requirements for processing e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “time requirements for processing were increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–881 t0 “Plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
EfficientDet D0 required more processing time .
EfficientDet D0 model e0 Verbatim
e0 “EfficientDet D0 model required more processing time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–915 t0 “Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The reduction effect of processing increased as processing time was extended.
processing time e2 Verbatim
t0 “Bambara Groundnut Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–156 e2 “the effect increased as processing time was elongated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–643 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The computer procedure increased processing time .
time requirements for processing e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “time requirements for processing were increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–881 t0 “Plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The algorithm was precise and reduced processing time .
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “The algorithm is precious and the processing time is decreased. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–649 t0 “Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–40 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Processing time decreased by 10 ms.
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “processing time was reduced by 10 ms ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1116 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Algorithm processing time met real- time tea picking requirements.
real-time requirements e0 Verbatim
e0 “the processing time of the algorithm met the real- time requirements for effective tea-picking operations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1373 t0 “Tea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The described confocal data processing method reduced processing time .
pollen and pistil e1 time needed for processing data in LCSM e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “the time needed for processing data in LCSM will be largely decreased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–279 e1 “with pollen and pistil of pear ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–194 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
FTIR distinguished Forsythis samples by processing time .
Forsythis suspense(Thunb.)Vahl e0 different processing time e0 different processing time e0 Verbatim
e0 “Forsythis suspense(Thunb.)Vahl can be distinguished by different processing methods and different processing time ,according to the number,the shape and the relative intensity of the absorption peaks ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–867 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
LLC averaged 1.66 milliseconds processing time .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “average 1.66 milliseconds of processing time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–707 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Processing time decreased significantly.
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “significant decrease in processing time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1149 t0 “plant leaf diseases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–103 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
YOLOv11 required less processing time than YOLOv10.
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
t0 “Crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33 e0 “YOLOv11 was more efficient, consuming less computational resources and processing time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1470 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The modified protocol reduced processing time .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “this protocol reduced the processing time , lowered costs, used less expensive equipment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1198 e1 “modified Valderrama-Cháirez protocol ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–965 t0 “banana leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–96 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Bayesian LASSO was the slowest in processing time .
Not reported Taxon Value
Verbatim
e0 “Considering the processing time , the three methodologies were statistically different, rrBLUP was the fastest, and Bayesian LASSO was the slowest. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1106 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
By avoiding semi-automated steps, NODeJ is stated to reduce processing time and analytical bias.
processing time and analytical bias e0 semi-automated steps e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “avoiding the semi-automated steps, resulting in reduced processing time and analytical bias ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1303 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The algorithm was precise and reduced processing time .
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “The algorithm is precious and the processing time is decreased. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–649 t0 “Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–40 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The segmentation approach has low inference time for near real- time processing .
near real-time processing e5 Verbatim
e1 “generate realistic and high resolution images of plant roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–267 e5 “low inference time for near real- time processing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1131 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The described confocal data processing method reduced processing time .
pollen and pistil e1 time needed for processing data in LCSM e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “the time needed for processing data in LCSM will be largely decreased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–279 e1 “with pollen and pistil of pear ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–194 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Feature reduction decreased processing time in many cases.
Feature reduction e0 Verbatim
t0 “Two Basil Species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 e0 “Feature reduction provides the decrease in processing time in many cases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–625 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
GoogLeNet required longer processing time than the other models.
high number of layers e0 the other models e0 Verbatim
e0 “the processing time for GoogLeNet is longer compared to the other models due to the high number of layers in its architecture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–871 t0 “Leaf Recognition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–64 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The procedure reduced data size and processing time without substantial information loss.
data size and processing time e0 important information e0 Verbatim
e0 “The procedure did not eliminate too much important information while reducing data size and processing time . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–579 e1 “Plants can be identified using several variables ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–57 Other claims from this paper (4)
not stated 14 Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The processing time of the leaf identification method was reduced
Verbatim
e0 “Ipomoea spp., a dicotyledon weed present in sugarcane plantations
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–130 e3 “the processing time was reduced ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–974 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The enhanced photogrammetric workflow for multitemporal data is claimed to reduce processing time for experts and nonprofessionals.
Verbatim
e0 “for vegetation analysis and monitoring ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–458 e3 “helps experts and nonprofessionals to reduce their processing time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1170 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The processing methods of Succus Bambusae were revealed for the first time .
processing methods of Succus Bambusae e3 Verbatim
e0 “This traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is derived from bamboo species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–286 e3 “Revealing processing methods of Succus Bambusae for the first time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1408 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Vigna subterranea
Nicotiana tabacum_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Pyrus communis
Ipomoea