View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Mechanism observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield , rather than temporal yield variability , drove stability.
Qualifierdriven by yield as opposed to temporal variability of yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Stability was driven by yield as opposed to temporal variability of yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–664 t0 “bioenergy crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–28 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Temporal variability across sowing times significantly affected soybean yield .
Treatmentdifferent sowing times e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “temporal variability associated with different sowing times significantly impacts soybean yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1173 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
High facies patchiness reduced yield or increased its temporal variability and reduced predictability.
SettingHigh facies patchiness e0 Verbatim
e0 “High facies patchiness either reduces yield or increases its temporal variability and reduces predictability. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1644 e1 “grain crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–24 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Spatial variability was below temporal variability and frequently below 1 mm.
OutcomeSpatial variability e0 Verbatim
e0 “Spatial variability was less than temporal variability , and frequently less than 1 mm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1319 t0 “crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 e1 “by corn and soybean phenological phase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1073 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield gaps of the four legumes showed large spatial and temporal variability across the production zones.
QualifierLarge spatial and temporal variability e3 Verbatim
e3 “Large spatial and temporal variability was observed in the yield gaps of the four legumes across the production zones ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1800 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Temporal precipitation variability was 0.17 to 3.40 mm·day−1.
OutcomeMedian absolute deviation from a reference year e0 Value0.17 to 3.40 mm·day−1 e0 Verbatim
e0 “Median absolute deviation from a reference year was 0.17 to 3.40 mm·day−1 ( temporal /year-to-year variability ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1232 t0 “crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 e1 “by corn and soybean phenological phase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1073 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Spatial and temporal corn yield variability were uncorrelated.
OutcomeSpatial and temporal variability e0 Not reported Setting Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Spatial and temporal variability were uncorrelated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1170 t0 “Corn Silage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Temporal soybean yield variability was 20–22%.
Outcomesoybean yield variability e7 Verbatim
e7 “Spatial and temporal soybean yield variability was 16–26% and 20–22%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2005–2087 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Maximum temporal yield variability was 14.7% between 2014 and 2017.
OutcomeMaximum temporal variability e0 Qualifierbetween the year 2014 and 2017 e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum temporal variability (14.7 %) was observed between the year 2014 and 2017. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–832 t0 “Paddy Crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–42 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Corn had significantly less temporal yield variability than soybean or sorghum.
Outcometemporal yield variability e0 Comparatorsoybean or sorghum e0 Verbatim
e0 “Corn had significantly less temporal yield variability than soybean or sorghum. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1295 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Temporal variability dominated spatial variability in the study.
OutcomeTemporal variability e0 Directionmuch more dominant e0 Comparatorspatial variability e0 Verbatim
e0 “Temporal variability was much more dominant than spatial variability in this study. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1524 t0 “Crop Sequences ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
A theoretical model suggests precision farming can reduce temporal yield variability under plausible circumstances.
Treatmentprecision farming e0 Outcometemporal yield variability e0 Qualifierplausible circumstances e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A theoretical model is presented that suggests that there are plausible circumstances under which precision farming can reduce temporal yield variability . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–499 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource author interpretation original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
A theoretical model suggests plausible conditions in which precision farming reduces temporal yield variability .
Treatmentprecision farming e0 Outcometemporal yield variability e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “A theoretical model is presented that suggests that there are plausible circumstances under which precision farming can reduce temporal yield variability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–489 Other claims from this paper (1) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.