View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
One cluster had a nonsignificant yield decrease with narrower rows.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “one had a nonsignificant yield decrease as RS narrowed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1183 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Pods per plant varied in a decrease – in crease– decrease pattern with dose, without significance.
Treatmentdose increment e0 Directiondecrease-increase-decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The pods, seeds and seed weight per plant as well as hundred-seed weight showed the same trend of decrease - in crease- decrease along with the dose in crement. However, these variations did not reach a significant level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–632 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Seeds per plant varied in a decrease – in crease– decrease pattern with dose, without significance.
Treatmentdose increment e0 Directiondecrease-increase-decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The pods, seeds and seed weight per plant as well as hundred-seed weight showed the same trend of decrease - in crease- decrease along with the dose in crement. However, these variations did not reach a significant level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–632 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Visible bud swelling began without a significant decrease in hardiness.
Organ / stagevisible bud swelling e0 Directionnot accompanied by a significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The in itiation of visible bud swelling was not accompanied by a significant decrease in hardiness ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–643 t0 “VACCINIUM ANGUSTIFOLIUM ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
There was no evidence for a decrease in yield caused by root-zone warming.
Verbatim
e0 “Rose cvs Ilona, Mercedes and Sonia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–41 e1 “There was no evidence for a decrease in yield caused by RZW ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1599 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A trend of nitrate decrease under optimal irrigation was evident.
Settingoptimal irrigation conditions e4 Verbatim
e0 “Seedlings of head lettuce (cultivar Santoro - Rijk Zwaan) were used ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–572 e4 “the trend of nitrates decrease in optimal irrigation conditions is evident ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2808–2882 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The compound annual growth rate in dicated a nonsignificant decrease for pigeon pea.
Verbatim
e1 “CAGR in dicated a nonsignificant decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–695 t0 “Pigeon Pea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Firmness of sweet cherry showed a non-significant decrease during ripening.
Verbatim
e0 “Picota sweet cherry cultivar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–185 e2 “a non-significant decrease in firmness ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–525 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Post-outbreak plants had a nonsignificant decrease in ascorbic acid.
Outcomeascorbic acid content e0 Verbatim
e0 “a nonsignificant decrease in ascorbic acid content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–792 t0 “Herbage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–21 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
ePE6d precise small edits did not decrease significantly relative to ePE2.
Outcomeprecise edits by ePE6d e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
t0 “rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–64 e0 “a significant decrease in precise edits by ePE6d was not observed throughout the targets ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2001–2089 Other claims from this paper (19) Method / resource Both ePE6c and ePE6d precisely edited rice calli, at average rates of 7.08% and 19.82%. Method / resource ePE6c had 1.83- to 10.12-fold lower small-edit efficiency than ePE2. Method / resource ePE6d generated 11.62- to 580.98-fold more pegRNA scaffold byproducts than ePE2. Method / resource ePE6c HA tag insertion efficiency was 6.87-fold lower than ePE2. Method / resource ePE6d precise HA insertion reached 15.56%, 8.36-fold above ePE2, at ERF141-T. Method / resource ePE6d precise HA insertion reached 14.10%, 2.72-fold above ePE2, at HLH109-T. Method / resource ePE6d precise HA insertion reached 32.15%, 2.65-fold above ePE2, at TubA1-T. Observation Incomplete insertions followed by flanking sequence replicates were the main ePE6d byproducts. Method / resource ePE6d byproducts stayed comparable to ePE2 at HLH109-T and TubA1-T but rose slightly at ERF141-T. Method / resource Precise c-MYC editing efficiency did not significantly differ between ePE2 and ePE6d. Observation Predicted pegRNA extension structure for c-MYC was more disordered than for HA. Method / resource ePE6d induced precise insertions in 20.83% to 70.83% of T0 lines versus 4.17% to 18.75% for ePE2. Method / resource Transgenic byproducts occurred at comparable frequencies of 10.94% with ePE2 and 11.46% with ePE6d. Method / resource ePE6d increased CBP insertion at ERF141-T, HLH109-T and TubA1-T by 2.26-, 5.65- and 7.56-fold, respectively. Method / resource ePE6d improved 3×c-MYC insertion overall by 4.47-fold, reaching 33.84% at ERF141-T. Method / resource ePE6d had higher edit to byproduct ratios than ePE2 in five of six edits. Method / resource Tagged transgenic lines for CBP increased from 7.64% under ePE2 to 50% under ePE6d. Method / resource Tagged transgenic lines for 3×c-MYC increased from 13.89% under ePE2 to 56.94% under ePE6d. Method / resource ePE6d achieved maximal precise editing of 81.25% of T0 lines for CBP at TubA1-T and 66.67% for 3×c-MYC at ERF141-T; three other tags included successful 3×HA and 3×AVI insertion but no intact GB1 insertion. Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Transferring CLAIR parameters did not significantly decrease estimation accuracy.
Outcomeestimation accuracies e0 Directionno significant decrease e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “transferability of the local CLAIR model parameters between the two test sites observing no significant decrease in estimation accuracies ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1476 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result negative not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Forecast errors produced a nonsignificant 0.03euro.m−2 (2%) decrease in greenhouse control performance relative to perfect forecasts.
Outcomeperformance of the controlled greenhouse system e0 Comparatorperfect forecasts e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the performance of the controlled greenhouse system is not significantly affected by the forecast error, a performance decrease of 0.03euro.m−2 (2%) was observed with respect to the case in which perfect forecasts were used ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1165 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.