Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in density”

114 matchesgrouped into 101 categories

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

1960 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Effects of irrigation and fertilization management on fiber yield and quality of kenaf 3

Show all 3 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

This irrigation schedule did not significantly decrease fiber linear density.

Taxon: kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
Treatment: Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and squaring and fruit stagee0
Outcome: fiber linear densitye0
Direction: did not decrease significantlye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–870

t0
“kenaf”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86

Title

Effects of irrigation and fertilization management on fiber yield and quality of kenaf

Wang Dao-b Guangdong nongye kexue 2014

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Low fertilization maximized fiber yield, length, and width.
Intervention effect Low fertilization did not significantly reduce fiber strength or line density.
Intervention effect Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer improved fiber yield and linear density.
Intervention effect Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer did not significantly reduce fiber strength.
Intervention effect Middle seedling irrigation followed by high irrigation gave higher fiber yield, strength and length than other treatments.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low fertilization did not significantly reduce fiber strength or line density.

Taxon: kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
Treatment: low fertilizatione0
Outcome: fiber strength and fiber line densitye0
Direction: no significant reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–870

t0
“kenaf”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86

Title

Effects of irrigation and fertilization management on fiber yield and quality of kenaf

Wang Dao-b Guangdong nongye kexue 2014

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Low fertilization maximized fiber yield, length, and width.
Intervention effect Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer improved fiber yield and linear density.
Intervention effect Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer did not significantly reduce fiber strength.
Intervention effect Middle seedling irrigation followed by high irrigation gave higher fiber yield, strength and length than other treatments.
Intervention effect This irrigation schedule did not significantly decrease fiber linear density.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer did not significantly reduce fiber strength.

Taxon: kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
Treatment: All NK fertilizer as base fertilizatione0
Outcome: fiber strengthe0
Direction: did not reduce significantlye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–870

t0
“kenaf”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86

Title

Effects of irrigation and fertilization management on fiber yield and quality of kenaf

Wang Dao-b Guangdong nongye kexue 2014

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Low fertilization maximized fiber yield, length, and width.
Intervention effect Low fertilization did not significantly reduce fiber strength or line density.
Intervention effect Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer improved fiber yield and linear density.
Intervention effect Middle seedling irrigation followed by high irrigation gave higher fiber yield, strength and length than other treatments.
Intervention effect This irrigation schedule did not significantly decrease fiber linear density.

Leaf UV-B Irradiation and Mycorrhizal Symbionts Affect Lettuce VOC Emissions and Defence Mechanisms, but Not Aphid Feeding Preferences 3

Show all 3 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The symbiosis was not affected by UV-B treatment.

Taxon: LettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment: UV-B treatmente2
Interactor: AMFe0symbiont
Outcome: symbiosise2
Direction: no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Lettuce plants subjected to UV-B radiation showed an increase in callose and oxidative stress indicators, as well as a decrease in stomatal density”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–671

e2
“Mycorrhizal colonization cancelled out the effect of UV-B on stomatal density, while the symbiosis was not affected by UV-B treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–806

e0
“lettuce plant response to AMF inoculation and UV-B exposure (0.4 W m−2; 16 h d−1; 2 weeks), either together or individually, as well as the interaction with the polyphagous insect pest Myzus persicae (Sulzer)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–522

Title

Leaf UV-B Irradiation and Mycorrhizal Symbionts Affect Lettuce VOC Emissions and Defence Mechanisms, but Not Aphid Feeding Preferences

Valeria Zeni; Arianna Grassi; Marco Santin; et al. Insects 2022. doi:10.3390/insects14010020

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect UV-B increased callose and oxidative stress indicators in lettuce.
Intervention effect UV-B decreased stomatal density in lettuce.
Intervention effect Mycorrhizal colonization cancelled out the UV-B effect on lettuce stomatal density.
Intervention effect Mycorrhization had no significant effect on the lettuce volatilome, regardless of UV-B treatment.
Intervention effect UV-B significantly altered lettuce plant volatile emission.
Intervention effect The 1-undecene abundance increased under UV-B with mycorrhization (+M/+UVB: 48.0 ± 7.78%).
Intervention effect The decanal content decreased under UV-B with mycorrhization (+M/+UVB: 8.50 ± 3.90%).
Intervention effect The undecanal content decreased under UV-B with mycorrhization (+M/+UVB: 2.1 ± 0.65%).
Intervention effect The sesquiterpene hydrocarbons decreased under UV-B with mycorrhization (+M/+UVB: 18.0 ± 9.62 %).
Intervention effect Aphid (Myzus persicae) population was unaffected by any of the AMF and UV-B treatments.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhization had no significant effect on the lettuce volatilome, regardless of UV-B treatment.

Taxon: LettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment: Mycorrhizatione6
Outcome: plant volatilomee6
Direction: no_changeinferrede6
Qualifier: regardless of UV-B treatmente6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Lettuce plants subjected to UV-B radiation showed an increase in callose and oxidative stress indicators, as well as a decrease in stomatal density”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–671

e6
“Mycorrhization, on the other hand, had no significant effect on the plant volatilome, regardless of UV-B treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1370

Title

Leaf UV-B Irradiation and Mycorrhizal Symbionts Affect Lettuce VOC Emissions and Defence Mechanisms, but Not Aphid Feeding Preferences

Valeria Zeni; Arianna Grassi; Marco Santin; et al. Insects 2022. doi:10.3390/insects14010020

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect UV-B increased callose and oxidative stress indicators in lettuce.
Intervention effect UV-B decreased stomatal density in lettuce.
Intervention effect Mycorrhizal colonization cancelled out the UV-B effect on lettuce stomatal density.
Intervention effect The symbiosis was not affected by UV-B treatment.
Intervention effect UV-B significantly altered lettuce plant volatile emission.
Intervention effect The 1-undecene abundance increased under UV-B with mycorrhization (+M/+UVB: 48.0 ± 7.78%).
Intervention effect The decanal content decreased under UV-B with mycorrhization (+M/+UVB: 8.50 ± 3.90%).
Intervention effect The undecanal content decreased under UV-B with mycorrhization (+M/+UVB: 2.1 ± 0.65%).
Intervention effect The sesquiterpene hydrocarbons decreased under UV-B with mycorrhization (+M/+UVB: 18.0 ± 9.62 %).
Intervention effect Aphid (Myzus persicae) population was unaffected by any of the AMF and UV-B treatments.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid (Myzus persicae) population was unaffected by any of the AMF and UV-B treatments.

Taxon: LettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment: AMF inoculation and UV-B exposuree0
Interactor: Myzus persicaeMyzus persicaee0pest
Outcome: Aphid populatione7
Direction: no_changeinferrede7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Lettuce plants subjected to UV-B radiation showed an increase in callose and oxidative stress indicators, as well as a decrease in stomatal density”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–671

e7
“Aphid population was unaffected by any of the treatments, implying a neutral plant response”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1463

e0
“lettuce plant response to AMF inoculation and UV-B exposure (0.4 W m−2; 16 h d−1; 2 weeks), either together or individually, as well as the interaction with the polyphagous insect pest Myzus persicae (Sulzer)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–522

Title

Leaf UV-B Irradiation and Mycorrhizal Symbionts Affect Lettuce VOC Emissions and Defence Mechanisms, but Not Aphid Feeding Preferences

Valeria Zeni; Arianna Grassi; Marco Santin; et al. Insects 2022. doi:10.3390/insects14010020

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect UV-B increased callose and oxidative stress indicators in lettuce.
Intervention effect UV-B decreased stomatal density in lettuce.
Intervention effect Mycorrhizal colonization cancelled out the UV-B effect on lettuce stomatal density.
Intervention effect The symbiosis was not affected by UV-B treatment.
Intervention effect Mycorrhization had no significant effect on the lettuce volatilome, regardless of UV-B treatment.
Intervention effect UV-B significantly altered lettuce plant volatile emission.
Intervention effect The 1-undecene abundance increased under UV-B with mycorrhization (+M/+UVB: 48.0 ± 7.78%).
Intervention effect The decanal content decreased under UV-B with mycorrhization (+M/+UVB: 8.50 ± 3.90%).
Intervention effect The undecanal content decreased under UV-B with mycorrhization (+M/+UVB: 2.1 ± 0.65%).
Intervention effect The sesquiterpene hydrocarbons decreased under UV-B with mycorrhization (+M/+UVB: 18.0 ± 9.62 %).

Blue-Light-Dependent Stomatal Density and Specific Leaf Weight Coordinate to Promote Gas Exchange of Soybean Leaves 3

Show all 3 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced intensity under red light did not influence stomatal density.

Treatment: decrease in light intensitye0
Outcome: stomatal density (SD)e0
Direction: did not influencee0
Qualifier: red lighte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the decrease in light intensity did not influence the stomatal density (SD), specific leaf weight (SLW) or gopmax under red light”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–705

Title

Blue-Light-Dependent Stomatal Density and Specific Leaf Weight Coordinate to Promote Gas Exchange of Soybean Leaves

Jiyu Chen; Jing Gao; Qi Wang; et al. Agriculture 2022. doi:10.3390/agriculture13010119

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Reduced intensity under blue light did not change stomatal size.
Intervention effect Reduced intensity under red light did not influence specific leaf weight.
Intervention effect Reduced intensity under red light did not influence maximum operational stomatal conductance.
Association Specific leaf weight was strongly correlated with stomatal density.
Association Specific leaf weight contributed 19.43% to gopmax.
Association Stomatal density contributed 19.5% to gopmax.
Mechanism Authors attribute enhanced gopmax under long-term blue light to jointly promoted SLW and SD.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced intensity under red light did not influence maximum operational stomatal conductance.

Treatment: decrease in light intensitye0
Outcome: gopmaxe0
Direction: did not influencee0
Qualifier: red lighte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the decrease in light intensity did not influence the stomatal density (SD), specific leaf weight (SLW) or gopmax under red light”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–705

Title

Blue-Light-Dependent Stomatal Density and Specific Leaf Weight Coordinate to Promote Gas Exchange of Soybean Leaves

Jiyu Chen; Jing Gao; Qi Wang; et al. Agriculture 2022. doi:10.3390/agriculture13010119

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Reduced intensity under blue light did not change stomatal size.
Intervention effect Reduced intensity under red light did not influence stomatal density.
Intervention effect Reduced intensity under red light did not influence specific leaf weight.
Association Specific leaf weight was strongly correlated with stomatal density.
Association Specific leaf weight contributed 19.43% to gopmax.
Association Stomatal density contributed 19.5% to gopmax.
Mechanism Authors attribute enhanced gopmax under long-term blue light to jointly promoted SLW and SD.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced intensity under red light did not influence specific leaf weight.

Treatment: decrease in light intensitye0
Outcome: specific leaf weight (SLW)e0
Direction: did not influencee0
Qualifier: red lighte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the decrease in light intensity did not influence the stomatal density (SD), specific leaf weight (SLW) or gopmax under red light”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–705

Title

Blue-Light-Dependent Stomatal Density and Specific Leaf Weight Coordinate to Promote Gas Exchange of Soybean Leaves

Jiyu Chen; Jing Gao; Qi Wang; et al. Agriculture 2022. doi:10.3390/agriculture13010119

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Reduced intensity under blue light did not change stomatal size.
Intervention effect Reduced intensity under red light did not influence stomatal density.
Intervention effect Reduced intensity under red light did not influence maximum operational stomatal conductance.
Association Specific leaf weight was strongly correlated with stomatal density.
Association Specific leaf weight contributed 19.43% to gopmax.
Association Stomatal density contributed 19.5% to gopmax.
Mechanism Authors attribute enhanced gopmax under long-term blue light to jointly promoted SLW and SD.

Use of spermosphere model for the screening of wheat cultivars and N₂-fixing bacteria for N₂ fixation 2

Show all 2 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing inoculum density did not improve nitrogenase positive tubes or activity variation.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: inoculum densitye0
Outcome: percentage of nitrogenase-positive tubese0
Direction: did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Increasing the concentration of yeast extract or the inoculum density, adding NaOH solution in the side arm of Pankhurst tubes to absorb CO 2 , and vernalizing the seeds did not increase the percentage of nitrogenase-positive tubes and did not decrease variation in acetylene-reducing activity.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–570

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52

Title

Use of spermosphere model for the screening of wheat cultivars and N₂-fixing bacteria for N₂ fixation

Devender K. Jain; R. J. Rennie Canadian Journal of Microbiology 1986. doi:10.1139/m86-058

Other claims from this paper (10)

Observation Wheat seedlings varied greatly in inducing acetylene reducing activity in root associated bacteria.
Observation Several wheat seedlings failed to induce nitrogenase in Bacillus strains.
Observation Several wheat seedlings failed to induce nitrogenase in Azospirillum brasilense.
Intervention effect Increasing yeast extract concentration did not increase nitrogenase positive tubes or decrease activity variation.
Intervention effect Adding NaOH did not improve nitrogenase positive tubes.
Intervention effect Vernalizing seeds did not improve nitrogenase positive tubes.
Intervention effect Raising incubation temperature from 25 to 27 °C induced nitrogenase in Bacillus.
Intervention effect Raising incubation temperature to 27 °C did not induce nitrogenase in Azospirillum.
Intervention effect At 30 °C nitrogenase was induced in Azospirillum strains.
Recommendation Authors conclude that the spermosphere model is impractical for screening wheat nitrogenase induction unless genetically uniform lines control variation.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing yeast extract concentration did not increase nitrogenase positive tubes or decrease activity variation.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: Increasing the concentration of yeast extracte0
Outcome: percentage of nitrogenase-positive tubes and did not decrease variation in acetylene-reducing activitye0
Direction: did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Increasing the concentration of yeast extract or the inoculum density, adding NaOH solution in the side arm of Pankhurst tubes to absorb CO 2 , and vernalizing the seeds did not increase the percentage of nitrogenase-positive tubes and did not decrease variation in acetylene-reducing activity.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–570

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52

Title

Use of spermosphere model for the screening of wheat cultivars and N₂-fixing bacteria for N₂ fixation

Devender K. Jain; R. J. Rennie Canadian Journal of Microbiology 1986. doi:10.1139/m86-058

Other claims from this paper (10)

Observation Wheat seedlings varied greatly in inducing acetylene reducing activity in root associated bacteria.
Observation Several wheat seedlings failed to induce nitrogenase in Bacillus strains.
Observation Several wheat seedlings failed to induce nitrogenase in Azospirillum brasilense.
Intervention effect Increasing inoculum density did not improve nitrogenase positive tubes or activity variation.
Intervention effect Adding NaOH did not improve nitrogenase positive tubes.
Intervention effect Vernalizing seeds did not improve nitrogenase positive tubes.
Intervention effect Raising incubation temperature from 25 to 27 °C induced nitrogenase in Bacillus.
Intervention effect Raising incubation temperature to 27 °C did not induce nitrogenase in Azospirillum.
Intervention effect At 30 °C nitrogenase was induced in Azospirillum strains.
Recommendation Authors conclude that the spermosphere model is impractical for screening wheat nitrogenase induction unless genetically uniform lines control variation.

Mechanical weeding of Rumex obtusifolius L. under different N, P and K availabilities in permanent grassland 2

Show all 2 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated mechanical removal of Rumex obtusifolius did not significantly decrease its density after three seasons.

Taxon: Rumex obtusifoliusRumex obtusifoliust0
Treatment: removed eight times during three vegetation seasonse1
Outcome: densitye2
Direction: No significant decreasee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Rumex obtusifolius”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–40

e1
“Plants of R. obtusifolius were removed eight times during three vegetation seasons”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–719

e2
“No significant decrease in the density of R. obtusifolius was recorded after three vegetation seasons and density was not significantly affected by fertilizer treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–889

Title

Mechanical weeding of Rumex obtusifolius L. under different N, P and K availabilities in permanent grassland

L. Strnad; M. Hejcman; V. Křišťálová; et al. Plant Soil and Environment 2010. doi:10.17221/83/2010-pse

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Density of Rumex obtusifolius was not significantly affected by fertilizer treatment.

Taxon: Rumex obtusifoliusRumex obtusifoliust0
Treatment: fertilizer treatmente2
Outcome: densitye2
Direction: not significantly affectede2
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“Rumex obtusifolius”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–40

e0
“using the following fertilizer treatments: control, P, N, NP and NPK”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–635

e2
“No significant decrease in the density of R. obtusifolius was recorded after three vegetation seasons and density was not significantly affected by fertilizer treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–889

Title

Mechanical weeding of Rumex obtusifolius L. under different N, P and K availabilities in permanent grassland

L. Strnad; M. Hejcman; V. Křišťálová; et al. Plant Soil and Environment 2010. doi:10.17221/83/2010-pse

Other claims from this paper (4)

Effect of Fumigation with 1,3-Dichloropropene and Chloropicrin on Fomesafen Dissipation in Eggplant Plasticulture Production 2

Show all 2 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation did not decrease purple nutsedge density.

Taxon: EggplantSolanum melongenat0
Treatment: Fumigatione0
Interactor: purple nutsedgee0weed
Outcome: purple nutsedge densitye0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Eggplant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99

e0
“Fumigation and fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1358

Title

Effect of Fumigation with 1,3-Dichloropropene and Chloropicrin on Fomesafen Dissipation in Eggplant Plasticulture Production

Thomas V. Reed; Nathan S. Boyd; P. Christopher Wilson; et al. Weed Science 2017. doi:10.1017/wsc.2017.64

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Soil fomesafen concentration declined 83% from application to harvest in 2015.
Observation Soil fomesafen concentration declined 96% from application to harvest in 2016.
Intervention effect Fumigation did not affect fomesafen dissipation in either year.
Intervention effect Fomesafen caused 14% eggplant injury two weeks after transplant.
Observation Eggplant injury fell below 5% at six weeks after transplant.
Intervention effect Fomesafen did not reduce eggplant height or yield versus untreated control.
Intervention effect S-metolachlor did not reduce eggplant height or yield versus untreated control.
Intervention effect Fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density.
Intervention effect S-metolachlor reduced purple nutsedge density by 48%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density.

Taxon: EggplantSolanum melongenat0
Treatment: fomesafene0
Interactor: purple nutsedgee0weed
Outcome: purple nutsedge densitye0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Eggplant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99

e0
“Fumigation and fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1358

Title

Effect of Fumigation with 1,3-Dichloropropene and Chloropicrin on Fomesafen Dissipation in Eggplant Plasticulture Production

Thomas V. Reed; Nathan S. Boyd; P. Christopher Wilson; et al. Weed Science 2017. doi:10.1017/wsc.2017.64

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Soil fomesafen concentration declined 83% from application to harvest in 2015.
Observation Soil fomesafen concentration declined 96% from application to harvest in 2016.
Intervention effect Fumigation did not affect fomesafen dissipation in either year.
Intervention effect Fomesafen caused 14% eggplant injury two weeks after transplant.
Observation Eggplant injury fell below 5% at six weeks after transplant.
Intervention effect Fomesafen did not reduce eggplant height or yield versus untreated control.
Intervention effect S-metolachlor did not reduce eggplant height or yield versus untreated control.
Intervention effect Fumigation did not decrease purple nutsedge density.
Intervention effect S-metolachlor reduced purple nutsedge density by 48%.

PRE herbicides and POST halosulfuron for purple nutsedge control in tomato grown in plasticulture systems 2

Show all 2 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretransplant S-metolachlor did not reduce purple nutsedge density.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: S -metolachlore0
Interactor: purple nutsedgee0weed
Outcome: purple nutsedge densitye0
Direction: did not decreasee0
Comparator: nontreated controle0

Verbatim

e0
“Pre-T treatment of sulfentrazone or S -metolachlor alone were ineffective and did not decrease purple nutsedge density compared with the nontreated control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–514

t0
“tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74

Title

PRE herbicides and POST halosulfuron for purple nutsedge control in tomato grown in plasticulture systems

Jialin Yu; Shaun S. Sharpe; Nathan S. Boyd Weed Technology 2020. doi:10.1017/wet.2020.24

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Pretransplant sulfentrazone did not reduce purple nutsedge density relative to untreated plots.
Intervention effect Posttransplant halosulfuron did not reduce nutsedge density at 12 weeks in fall 2017.
Intervention effect Posttransplant halosulfuron reduced nutsedge density at 17 weeks in both seasons.
Intervention effect Pretransplant sulfentrazone followed by posttransplant halosulfuron reduced nutsedge populations in both seasons.
Intervention effect Pretransplant S-metolachlor followed by posttransplant halosulfuron reduced nutsedge populations in both seasons.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments did not injure tomato or reduce its height or yield.
Intervention effect Sequential herbicide programs generally improved nutsedge control over single-timing applications.
Recommendation The authors recommend posttransplant halosulfuron for season-long nutsedge control.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretransplant sulfentrazone did not reduce purple nutsedge density relative to untreated plots.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: sulfentrazonee0
Interactor: purple nutsedgee0weed
Outcome: purple nutsedge densitye0
Direction: did not decreasee0
Comparator: nontreated controle0

Verbatim

e0
“Pre-T treatment of sulfentrazone or S -metolachlor alone were ineffective and did not decrease purple nutsedge density compared with the nontreated control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–514

t0
“tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74

Title

PRE herbicides and POST halosulfuron for purple nutsedge control in tomato grown in plasticulture systems

Jialin Yu; Shaun S. Sharpe; Nathan S. Boyd Weed Technology 2020. doi:10.1017/wet.2020.24

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Pretransplant S-metolachlor did not reduce purple nutsedge density.
Intervention effect Posttransplant halosulfuron did not reduce nutsedge density at 12 weeks in fall 2017.
Intervention effect Posttransplant halosulfuron reduced nutsedge density at 17 weeks in both seasons.
Intervention effect Pretransplant sulfentrazone followed by posttransplant halosulfuron reduced nutsedge populations in both seasons.
Intervention effect Pretransplant S-metolachlor followed by posttransplant halosulfuron reduced nutsedge populations in both seasons.
Intervention effect Herbicide treatments did not injure tomato or reduce its height or yield.
Intervention effect Sequential herbicide programs generally improved nutsedge control over single-timing applications.
Recommendation The authors recommend posttransplant halosulfuron for season-long nutsedge control.

Strategies to improve the control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Erigeron canadensis) with glufosinate applied preplant to soybean 2

Show all 2 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding halauxifen-methyl did not improve horseweed control or lower density and biomass.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment: halauxifen-methyle1
Interactor: horseweedErigeron canadensise1weed
Outcome: GR horseweed controle1
Direction: no improvemente1
Comparator: glufosinatee1

Verbatim

e0
“soybean planting”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–157

e1
“There was no improvement in GR horseweed control from the addition of halauxifen-methyl, 2,4-D ester or saflufenacil to glufosinate and no decrease in density and biomass”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–924

Title

Strategies to improve the control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Erigeron canadensis) with glufosinate applied preplant to soybean

Meghan Dilliott; Nader Soltani; David C. Hooker; et al. Weed Technology 2022. doi:10.1017/wet.2022.12

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Glufosinate controlled resistant horseweed 65% at two weeks.
Intervention effect Glufosinate controlled resistant horseweed 66% at four weeks.
Intervention effect Glufosinate controlled resistant horseweed 63% at eight weeks.
Intervention effect Glufosinate reduced horseweed density 46% at eight weeks.
Intervention effect Glufosinate reduced horseweed biomass 33% at eight weeks.
Intervention effect Adding 2,4-D ester did not improve horseweed control or lower density and biomass.
Intervention effect Adding saflufenacil did not improve horseweed control overall.
Intervention effect Adding saflufenacil lowered horseweed density 30% relative to glufosinate alone.
Intervention effect Adding metribuzin improved horseweed control by 22% at two weeks.
Intervention effect Adding metribuzin improved horseweed control by 22% at four weeks.
Intervention effect Adding metribuzin improved horseweed control by 28% at eight weeks.
Intervention effect Adding metribuzin further reduced horseweed density 50% at eight weeks.
Intervention effect Adding metribuzin further reduced horseweed biomass 47% at eight weeks.
Intervention effect Adding dicamba improved horseweed control by 19%, 26%, and 30% at two, four and eight weeks respectively.
Intervention effect Adding dicamba further reduced horseweed density 54% at eight weeks.
Intervention effect Adding dicamba further reduced horseweed biomass 60% at eight weeks.
Intervention effect Increasing glufosinate rate did not improve horseweed control.
Intervention effect Using 28% UAN carrier did not improve horseweed control.
Intervention effect All tested herbicide additions, a higher glufosinate rate, and UAN carrier improved consistency of horseweed control.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 2,4-D ester did not improve horseweed control or lower density and biomass.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment: 2,4-D estere1
Interactor: horseweedErigeron canadensise1weed
Outcome: GR horseweed controle1
Direction: no improvemente1
Comparator: glufosinatee1

Verbatim

e0
“soybean planting”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–157

e1
“There was no improvement in GR horseweed control from the addition of halauxifen-methyl, 2,4-D ester or saflufenacil to glufosinate and no decrease in density and biomass”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–924

Title

Strategies to improve the control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Erigeron canadensis) with glufosinate applied preplant to soybean

Meghan Dilliott; Nader Soltani; David C. Hooker; et al. Weed Technology 2022. doi:10.1017/wet.2022.12

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Glufosinate controlled resistant horseweed 65% at two weeks.
Intervention effect Glufosinate controlled resistant horseweed 66% at four weeks.
Intervention effect Glufosinate controlled resistant horseweed 63% at eight weeks.
Intervention effect Glufosinate reduced horseweed density 46% at eight weeks.
Intervention effect Glufosinate reduced horseweed biomass 33% at eight weeks.
Intervention effect Adding halauxifen-methyl did not improve horseweed control or lower density and biomass.
Intervention effect Adding saflufenacil did not improve horseweed control overall.
Intervention effect Adding saflufenacil lowered horseweed density 30% relative to glufosinate alone.
Intervention effect Adding metribuzin improved horseweed control by 22% at two weeks.
Intervention effect Adding metribuzin improved horseweed control by 22% at four weeks.
Intervention effect Adding metribuzin improved horseweed control by 28% at eight weeks.
Intervention effect Adding metribuzin further reduced horseweed density 50% at eight weeks.
Intervention effect Adding metribuzin further reduced horseweed biomass 47% at eight weeks.
Intervention effect Adding dicamba improved horseweed control by 19%, 26%, and 30% at two, four and eight weeks respectively.
Intervention effect Adding dicamba further reduced horseweed density 54% at eight weeks.
Intervention effect Adding dicamba further reduced horseweed biomass 60% at eight weeks.
Intervention effect Increasing glufosinate rate did not improve horseweed control.
Intervention effect Using 28% UAN carrier did not improve horseweed control.
Intervention effect All tested herbicide additions, a higher glufosinate rate, and UAN carrier improved consistency of horseweed control.

Reclamation of salt-affected soils using amendments and growing wheat crop 2

Show all 2 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied amendments non-significantly decreased soil bulk density.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment: applied treatmentse1
Outcome: bulk densitye1
Direction: decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“After the harvest of wheat 2008-09, non-significant decrease in bulk density was recorded with applied treatments while infiltration rate remained unchanged”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–692

e2
“The treatments employed were: Tube well water (TW) alone; TW + Gypsum @ 50% soil gypsum requirement (TW + G50); TW–Canal water (CW) + G50; TW–CW + farm manure (FM) @ 25 Mg ha-1 (TW-CW + FM) before sowing wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–534

Title

Reclamation of salt-affected soils using amendments and growing wheat crop

Behzad Murtaza*, Ghulam Murtaza, Muhammad Zia-ur-Rehman, Abdul Ghafoor, Saqib Abubakar; Muhammad Sabir DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2011

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Applied amendments left soil infiltration rate unchanged.
Intervention effect TW–CW with farm manure significantly decreased ECe and SAR at all three sites.
Intervention effect The maximum decrease in ECe with TW–CW + FM was 72.65% at 0-15 cm depth at site 2.
Intervention effect The maximum decrease in ECe with TW–CW + FM was 77.62% at 15-30 cm depth at site 1.
Intervention effect The maximum decrease in SAR with TW–CW + FM was 75.76% at 0-15 cm depth at site 2.
Intervention effect The maximum decrease in SAR with TW–CW + FM was 63.93% at 15-30 cm depth at site 3.
Intervention effect Maximum wheat grain yield with TW–CW + FM was 3656 kg/ha at site 1.
Intervention effect Maximum wheat grain yield with TW–CW + FM was 3531 kg/ha at site 2.
Intervention effect Maximum wheat grain yield with TW–CW + FM was 3826 kg/ha at site 3.
Intervention effect Maximum wheat straw yield with TW–CW + FM was 4826 kg/ha at site 1.
Intervention effect Maximum wheat straw yield with TW–CW + FM was 4624 kg/ha at site 2.
Intervention effect Maximum wheat straw yield with TW–CW + FM was 4707 kg/ha at site 3.
Intervention effect The net benefit was maximum with TW–CW + FM at all three sites.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied amendments left soil infiltration rate unchanged.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment: applied treatmentse1
Outcome: infiltration ratee1
Direction: unchangede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“After the harvest of wheat 2008-09, non-significant decrease in bulk density was recorded with applied treatments while infiltration rate remained unchanged”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–692

e2
“The treatments employed were: Tube well water (TW) alone; TW + Gypsum @ 50% soil gypsum requirement (TW + G50); TW–Canal water (CW) + G50; TW–CW + farm manure (FM) @ 25 Mg ha-1 (TW-CW + FM) before sowing wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–534

Title

Reclamation of salt-affected soils using amendments and growing wheat crop

Behzad Murtaza*, Ghulam Murtaza, Muhammad Zia-ur-Rehman, Abdul Ghafoor, Saqib Abubakar; Muhammad Sabir DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2011

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Applied amendments non-significantly decreased soil bulk density.
Intervention effect TW–CW with farm manure significantly decreased ECe and SAR at all three sites.
Intervention effect The maximum decrease in ECe with TW–CW + FM was 72.65% at 0-15 cm depth at site 2.
Intervention effect The maximum decrease in ECe with TW–CW + FM was 77.62% at 15-30 cm depth at site 1.
Intervention effect The maximum decrease in SAR with TW–CW + FM was 75.76% at 0-15 cm depth at site 2.
Intervention effect The maximum decrease in SAR with TW–CW + FM was 63.93% at 15-30 cm depth at site 3.
Intervention effect Maximum wheat grain yield with TW–CW + FM was 3656 kg/ha at site 1.
Intervention effect Maximum wheat grain yield with TW–CW + FM was 3531 kg/ha at site 2.
Intervention effect Maximum wheat grain yield with TW–CW + FM was 3826 kg/ha at site 3.
Intervention effect Maximum wheat straw yield with TW–CW + FM was 4826 kg/ha at site 1.
Intervention effect Maximum wheat straw yield with TW–CW + FM was 4624 kg/ha at site 2.
Intervention effect Maximum wheat straw yield with TW–CW + FM was 4707 kg/ha at site 3.
Intervention effect The net benefit was maximum with TW–CW + FM at all three sites.

Grain sorghum and late-emerging Palmer amaranth response to sorghum planting density and nitrogen rate in an irrigated environment 2

Show all 2 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 112 kg N at high sorghum planting density did not decrease the number, height, or biomass of late-emerging Palmer amaranth.

Taxon: sorghumSorghume0
Treatment: applying 112 kg Ne3
Interactor: Palmer amaranthe2weed
Outcome: Palmer amaranth’s number, height, and biomasse3
Direction: no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2
“Weedy sorghum was infested with late-emerging Palmer amaranth only”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–665

e3
“applying 112 kg N ha −1 did not improve grain yield or decrease Palmer amaranth’s number, height, and biomass”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–899

e0
“At the high sorghum planting density”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–764

Title

Grain sorghum and late-emerging Palmer amaranth response to sorghum planting density and nitrogen rate in an irrigated environment

Ivan B. Cuvaca; Ednaldo A. Borgato; Randall Currie; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2023. doi:10.1139/cjps-2023-0058

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Weed-free sorghum outyielded its weedy counterpart by 42.2%.
Intervention effect At high sorghum planting density, applying 112 kg N ha-1 did not improve grain yield.
Intervention effect Applying 112 kg N at high sorghum planting density increased sorghum head number and height.
Recommendation Strategies for long-season Palmer amaranth control are needed to protect sorghum yield from weed competition.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high sorghum planting density, applying 112 kg N ha-1 did not improve grain yield.

Taxon: sorghumSorghume0
Treatment: applying 112 kg Ne3
Outcome: grain yielde3
Direction: did not improvee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3
“applying 112 kg N ha −1 did not improve grain yield or decrease Palmer amaranth’s number, height, and biomass”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–899

e0
“At the high sorghum planting density”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–764

Title

Grain sorghum and late-emerging Palmer amaranth response to sorghum planting density and nitrogen rate in an irrigated environment

Ivan B. Cuvaca; Ednaldo A. Borgato; Randall Currie; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2023. doi:10.1139/cjps-2023-0058

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Weed-free sorghum outyielded its weedy counterpart by 42.2%.
Intervention effect Applying 112 kg N at high sorghum planting density did not decrease the number, height, or biomass of late-emerging Palmer amaranth.
Intervention effect Applying 112 kg N at high sorghum planting density increased sorghum head number and height.
Recommendation Strategies for long-season Palmer amaranth control are needed to protect sorghum yield from weed competition.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in density”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

Effects of irrigation and fertilization management on fiber yield and quality of kenaf 3

Leaf UV-B Irradiation and Mycorrhizal Symbionts Affect Lettuce VOC Emissions and Defence Mechanisms, but Not Aphid Feeding Preferences 3

Blue-Light-Dependent Stomatal Density and Specific Leaf Weight Coordinate to Promote Gas Exchange of Soybean Leaves 3

Use of spermosphere model for the screening of wheat cultivars and N₂-fixing bacteria for N₂ fixation 2

Mechanical weeding of Rumex obtusifolius L. under different N, P and K availabilities in permanent grassland 2

Effect of Fumigation with 1,3-Dichloropropene and Chloropicrin on Fomesafen Dissipation in Eggplant Plasticulture Production 2

PRE herbicides and POST halosulfuron for purple nutsedge control in tomato grown in plasticulture systems 2

Strategies to improve the control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Erigeron canadensis) with glufosinate applied preplant to soybean 2

Reclamation of salt-affected soils using amendments and growing wheat crop 2

Grain sorghum and late-emerging Palmer amaranth response to sorghum planting density and nitrogen rate in an irrigated environment 2

“decrease in density”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

Effects of irrigation and fertilization management on fiber yield and quality of kenaf 3

Leaf UV-B Irradiation and Mycorrhizal Symbionts Affect Lettuce VOC Emissions and Defence Mechanisms, but Not Aphid Feeding Preferences 3

Blue-Light-Dependent Stomatal Density and Specific Leaf Weight Coordinate to Promote Gas Exchange of Soybean Leaves 3

Use of spermosphere model for the screening of wheat cultivars and N2-fixing bacteria for N2 fixation 2

Mechanical weeding of Rumex obtusifolius L. under different N, P and K availabilities in permanent grassland 2

Effect of Fumigation with 1,3-Dichloropropene and Chloropicrin on Fomesafen Dissipation in Eggplant Plasticulture Production 2

PRE herbicides and POST halosulfuron for purple nutsedge control in tomato grown in plasticulture systems 2

Strategies to improve the control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Erigeron canadensis) with glufosinate applied preplant to soybean 2

Reclamation of salt-affected soils using amendments and growing wheat crop 2

Grain sorghum and late-emerging Palmer amaranth response to sorghum planting density and nitrogen rate in an irrigated environment 2

Use of spermosphere model for the screening of wheat cultivars and N₂-fixing bacteria for N₂ fixation 2