View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Sensitivity of APSIM/ORYZA model due to estimation errors in solar radiation 4 Show all 4 → Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The accuracy of estimated daily solar radiation models did not differ substantially among sites.
Verbatim
e0 “The accuracy of the 5 models for estimated daily solar radiation was similar, and it was not substantially different among sites. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–718 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result no effect simulated Claim · model-written summary
In water-limited, non-irrigated environments, simulated LAI was not sensitive to uncertainty in the radiation models.
water limited environments (no irrigation) e0 radiation models e0 Verbatim
e0 “For water limited environments (no irrigation), crop model outputs yield, biomass and LAI was not sensitive for the uncertainties in radiation models studied here. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–882 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result no effect simulated Claim · model-written summary
In water-limited, non-irrigated environments, simulated crop yield was not sensitive to uncertainty in the radiation models.
water limited environments (no irrigation) e0 radiation models e0 Verbatim
e0 “For water limited environments (no irrigation), crop model outputs yield, biomass and LAI was not sensitive for the uncertainties in radiation models studied here. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–882 Other claims from this paper (4) Development and Evaluation of a Flow Measurement Device for Cotton Yield Mapping 3 Show all 3 → Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Time since calibration had no significant effect on load prediction errors .
load prediction errors e0 nosignificant effect e0 time elapsed since last system calibration e0 Not reported Setting
Verbatim
e0 “the amount of time elapsed since last system calibration had nosignificant effect on load prediction errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1020 t0 “Cotton Yield Mapping ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–80 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cotton moisture content had no significant effect on load prediction errors .
load prediction errors e0 nosignificant effect e0 Verbatim
e0 “Average cotton flow rate, cottonmoisture content, and the amount of time elapsed since last system calibration had nosignificant effect on load prediction errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1020 t0 “Cotton Yield Mapping ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–80 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Average cotton flow rate had no significant effect on load prediction errors .
load prediction errors e0 nosignificant effect e0 Average cotton flow rate e0 Not reported Setting
Verbatim
e0 “Average cotton flow rate, cottonmoisture content, and the amount of time elapsed since last system calibration had nosignificant effect on load prediction errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1020 t0 “Cotton Yield Mapping ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–80 Other claims from this paper (6) The Distribution of Cysts of Globodera Rostochiensis in Small Plots and the Resulting Sampling Errors 2 Show all 2 → Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The value of k was the same for samples taken before planting and after lifting of the potatoes in the same field.
Verbatim
e0 “The value of k was the same for samples taken before planting and, in the same field after lifting of the potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1281 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The value of k is largely independent of cyst density and soil type.
largely independent of cyst density and soil type e5 Verbatim
e0 “The value of k was the same for samples taken before planting and, in the same field after lifting of the potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1281 e5 “Apparently, it was also largely independent of cyst density and soil type ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1356 Other claims from this paper (5) Application of principal component analysis to the prediction of lucerne forage protein content and in vitro dry matter digestibility by NIR spectroscopy 2 Show all 2 → Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
For IVDMD determination, PCR and MLR gave similar results, with correlation coefficients of 0.942 (MLR) and 0.951 (PCR).
IVDMD determination e0 standard errors of prediction: 2.22 and 2.22% DM e0 Verbatim
t0 “lucerne ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–72 e0 “The same was observed for IVDMD determination (correlation coefficients: 0.942 and 0.951; standard errors of calibration: 1.89 and 1.71% DM; standard errors of prediction: 2.22 and 2.22% DM, respectively) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1130 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
For protein determination in 345 lucerne forage samples, PCR and MLR gave quite similar results, with correlation coefficients of 0.978 (MLR) and 0.980 (PCR).
protein determination e0 standard errors of prediction: 0.81 and 0.80% DM e0 Verbatim
t0 “lucerne ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–72 e0 “For protein determination, results of both procedures were quite similar (correlation coefficients: 0.978 and 0.980; standard errors of calibration: 0.86 and 0.84% DM; standard errors of prediction: 0.81 and 0.80% DM respectively for MLR and PCR prediction equations) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–924 Other claims from this paper (3) Yield Editor 2.0: Software for Automated Removal of Yield Map Errors 2 Show all 2 → Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield Editor 2.0 gives equivalent accuracy compared with the interactive methods of Yield Editor 1.x.
interactive methods available in Yield Editor 1.x e2 Verbatim
e2 “Yield Editor 2.0 provides greatly improved efficiency and equivalent accuracy compared to the interactive methods available in Yield Editor 1.x ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1409 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
On fifty grain yield maps, automated AYCE cleaning did not differ significantly from interactive cleaning by an expert user for field mean yield, yield standard deviation and number of remaining yield observations.
field mean yield, yield standard deviation, and number of yield observations remaining after cleaning e1 not significantly different e1 interactive cleaning by an expert user e1 Verbatim
e1 “On a test set of fifty grain yield maps, AYCE cleaning was not significantly different than interactive cleaning by an expert user when examining field mean yield, yield standard deviation, and number of yield observations remaining after cleaning ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1264 Other claims from this paper (2) Evaluation of Planter Errors Associated with Twin‐Row Soybean Production in Mississippi 2 Show all 2 → Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Separate missing rows did not reduce soybean yield compared with no error.
did not reduce e0 Verbatim
e0 “Single and Separate planter error did not reduce yield compared with None. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1563 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A single missing row did not reduce soybean yield compared with no error.
did not reduce e0 Verbatim
e0 “Single and Separate planter error did not reduce yield compared with None. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1563 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61 Other claims from this paper (4) REAL-TIME X-RAY INSPECTION OF WHEAT FOR INFESTATION BY THE GRANARY WEEVIL, SITOPHILUS GRANARIUS (L.) 1 Show all 1 → Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
For infestations beyond the third larval instar, recognition errors were below 2% for both image sets and did not differ significantly.
errors for both sets of images e0 not significantly different e0 more advanced than the 3rd larval instar e0 both sets of images e0 Verbatim
t0 “WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 e0 “when considering only infestations more advanced than the 3rd larval instar, errors for both sets of images fell below2% and were not significantly different ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1273 Other claims from this paper (5) The uptake of 15 N‐labelled fertiliser by winter wheat and its immobilisation in a clay soil after direct drilling or ploughing 1 Show all 1 → Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Changes due to mineralisation of soil organic matter during the two years were within the errors of the experiment.
changes due to mineralisation of the soil organic matter e2 within the errors of the experiment e2 Verbatim
e1 “The uptake of fertiliser nitrogen (N) by winter wheat was measured ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–75 e2 “Any changes due to mineralisation of the soil organic matter during the 2 years of the experiment were within the errors of the experiment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1452 Other claims from this paper (8) Diagnostic leaf analysis for stone fruit. I. Errors associated with standard and simplified sampling procedures 1 Show all 1 → Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Sampling non-fruiting wood did not increase sampling error.
did not increase e0 non-fruiting wood e0 Verbatim
e0 “the sampling of non-fruiting wood did not increase error. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–612 t0 “Diagnostic leaf analysis for stone fruit. I. Errors associated with standard and simplified sampling procedures ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–111 Other claims from this paper (6) Standard Errors of Heritabilities for Forage Breeding Nurseries 1 Show all 1 → Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Heritability estimates from the two methods were statistically the same in both models.
Heritability estimates e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Heritability estimates were statistically the same for the two methods for both models. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–789 e1 “red clover germplasm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–700 Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Gossypium hirsutum
Solanum tuberosum
Medicago sativa
Glycine max
Triticum aestivum
Trifolium pratense