Claim · model-written summary
In maize roots, S-deprivation changed P by −12.7%.
- Organ / stage
- roote2
- Treatment
- sulfur (S)-deprivatione0
- Outcome
- Pe2
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede2
- Value
- −12.7%e2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Thirteen-day-old maize (Zea mays L.) plants were exposed hydroponically to sulfur (S)-deprivation and their nutritional status was monitored for ten days”
e2“In the root, the relative impact was: N = K = Ca = Zn = B > P (−12.7%) > NO3 (−14.7%) > NH4 (−18.4%) > W (−27.8%) > Mn (−34.4%) > Mg (−37.5%) > Fe = Cu (−40.5%) > S (−126.6%)”
Title
Dimitris L. Bouranis; Styliani N. Chorianopoulou; Lampros D. Bouranis Journal of Plant Nutrition 2014. doi:10.1080/01904167.2013.873455
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Intervention effect In maize shoots, S-deprivation changed calcium (Ca) by 45.3% relative to dry mass.
- Intervention effect In maize shoots, S-deprivation changed nitrate (NO3) by 18.9% relative to dry mass.
- Intervention effect In maize shoots, S-deprivation changed magnesium (Mg) by 17.2% relative to dry mass.
- Intervention effect In maize shoots, S-deprivation changed manganese (Mn) by 14.1% relative to dry mass.
- Intervention effect In maize shoots, S-deprivation changed nitrogen (N) by −4.3% relative to dry mass.
- Intervention effect In maize shoots, S-deprivation changed ammonium (NH4) by −4.7% relative to dry mass.
- Intervention effect In maize shoots, S-deprivation changed zinc (Zn) by −12% relative to dry mass.
- Intervention effect In maize shoots, S-deprivation changed boron (B) by −21.4% relative to dry mass.
- Intervention effect In maize shoots, S-deprivation changed S by −75.2% relative to dry mass.
- Intervention effect In maize shoots, S-deprivation left water, P, K, Fe and Cu unchanged relative to dry mass.
- Intervention effect In maize roots, S-deprivation changed NO3 by −14.7%.
- Intervention effect In maize roots, S-deprivation changed NH4 by −18.4%.
- Intervention effect In maize roots, S-deprivation changed W by −27.8%.
- Intervention effect In maize roots, S-deprivation changed Mn by −34.4%.
- Intervention effect In maize roots, S-deprivation changed Mg by −37.5%.
- Intervention effect In maize roots, S-deprivation changed Fe = Cu by −40.5%.
- Intervention effect In maize roots, S-deprivation changed S by −126.6%.
- Intervention effect In maize roots, S-deprivation left N, K, Ca, Zn and B unchanged.
- Method / resource Both formulations of the power-function approach gave the same conclusions.