Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“dry weight decrease”

15 matchesgrouped into 1 category

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 5 non-evaluative

Over time

1970 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Taxon: apple ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

apple 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under shade, declining soil water potential reduced leaf dry weight by 20%.

Taxon: appleMalus domesticat0
Treatment: a decrease in soil water potentiale0
Outcome: dry weighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 20%e0
Qualifier: Under shadee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Under shade, a decrease in soil water potential resulted in a 20% decrease in dry weight.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–784

t0
“Apple Tree”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–42

Title

The Influence of Environment on Apple Tree Growth, Leaf Wax Formation, and Foliar Absorption

Rebecca L. Darnell; David C. Ferree Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1983. doi:10.21273/jashs.108.3.506

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect At 20°C, 75% shade reduced apple shoot growth and leaf number.
Intervention effect At 25°, shading had no effect on apple shoot growth and leaf number.
Intervention effect At high soil water potential, 75% shade significantly reduced total leaf area.
Intervention effect At low soil water potential, shading had little effect on total leaf area.
Intervention effect Under full sun, declining soil water potential reduced total leaf dry weight by 46%.
Intervention effect Under full sun, rising temperature decreased total stem dry weight.
Intervention effect Under shade, temperature had little effect on stem dry weight.
Intervention effect At 75% shade, rising temperature decreased specific leaf weight.
Intervention effect In full sun, temperature had no effect on specific leaf weight.
Observation Environmental interactions did not influence specific leaf weight of new leaves.
Intervention effect Leaf epicuticular wax quantity rose as soil water potential fell.
Intervention effect Lower soil water potential increased the proportion of alkanes in leaf wax.
Intervention effect Lower soil water potential increased the proportion of wax esters in leaf wax.
Intervention effect Alkane content rose as temperature rose.
Method / resource Environmental conditions changed photosynthetic functioning and masked prometryn effects, making the herbicide unreliable for measuring foliar absorption.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The regression model predicted apple shoot dry weight from fertility and ground cover dry weight.

Taxon: AppleMalus domesticat0
Interactor: ground cover speciese0weed
Outcome: Apple shoot dry weighte0
Direction: increasee0
Comparator: fertility levelse0

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

e0
“Apple shoot dry weight over all fertility levels, ground cover species, and densities was predicted by a regression model based on increase with fertility and decrease with ground cover dry weight.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–766

t0
“Apple”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26

Title

Interference Between Apple (Malus domestica) Seedlings and Four Ground Cover Species Under Greenhouse Conditions

John M. Shribbs; Walter A. Skroch; Thomas J. Monaco Weed Science 1986. doi:10.1017/s0043174500067382

Other claims from this paper (5)

Association Orchardgrass inhibited apple growth more than Kentucky bluegrass per plant.
Association Red sorrel inhibited apple growth more than Kentucky bluegrass per plant.
Association Korean lespedeza inhibition of apple growth was associated with its root nodulation.
Intervention effect Nitrogen addition increased apple nitrogen levels.
Intervention effect Nitrogen addition did not fully overcome apple growth inhibition.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1500 nematodes per kg soil, shoot dry weight of M.26 decreased by 29%.

Taxon: appleMalus domesticat0
Material: M.26e3
Treatment: 1 500 nematodes kg -1 soil densitye3
Interactor: Pratylenchus penetransPratylenchus penetranst0pathogen
Outcome: dry shoot weighte3
Direction: decreasee3
Value: 29%e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Pathogenicity of Pratylenchus penetrans to dwarfing apple rootstocks”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68

e3
“Under the 1 500 nematodes kg -1 soil density, the dry shoot weight of Bud 9 and M.9 were not significantly different from the 500 nematodes kg -1 soil density except M.26 which exhibited a 29% decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–555

Title

Pathogenicity of Pratylenchus penetrans to dwarfing apple rootstocks

Guy Bélair; Nathalie Dauphinais; Yvon Fournier Phytoprotection 2019. doi:10.7202/1059304ar

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect At 500 nematodes per kg soil, shoot dry weight of Bud 9 was significantly reduced by 30%.
Intervention effect At 500 nematodes per kg soil, shoot dry weight of M.9 was significantly reduced by 23%.
Intervention effect At 500 nematodes per kg soil, shoot dry weight of M.26 was significantly reduced by 14%.
Intervention effect At 1500 nematodes per kg soil, root dry weight of M.26 was reduced by 26% relative to non-inoculated trees.
Intervention effect Root dry weights of rootstocks, except M.26, were not significantly reduced by these P. penetrans densities.
Intervention effect At 1500 nematodes per kg soil, shoot dry weight of Bud 9 and M.9 was not significantly different from that at 500 nematodes per kg soil.
Association M.26 may show some tolerance to P. penetrans at lower density compared with M.9 and Bud 9 (preliminary).
Association At higher nematode densities, Bud 9 and M.9 showed greater root-system tolerance than M.26.
Recommendation Further assessment of susceptibility and tolerance of dwarfing apple rootstocks to P. penetrans densities is needed.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“dry weight decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

apple 15