Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At 25°, shading had no effect on apple shoot growth and leaf number.

A claim from The Influence of Environment on Apple Tree Growth, Leaf Wax Formation, and Foliar Absorption · 1983

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25°, shading had no effect on apple shoot growth and leaf number.

Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
shoot growth and leaf numbere0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
warmer temperatures (25°)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under cooler temperatures (20°C), 75% shade reduced shoot growth and leaf number; however, under warmer temperatures (25°), shading had no effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–406
t0

“Apple Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–42

Title

The Influence of Environment on Apple Tree Growth, Leaf Wax Formation, and Foliar Absorption

Rebecca L. Darnell; David C. Ferree Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1983. doi:10.21273/jashs.108.3.506

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-2faafa8651f7daa428cb498aae10642739c33bb94f9f9009f93c3c2ebd309caf · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

shade · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

17 papers: 1 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.