Paper · 1974 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Net Photosynthesis, Dark Respiration, Specific Leaf Weight, and Growth of Young Apple Trees as Influenced by Light Regime1

J. A. Barden

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
51
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Eight different light treatments did not affect shoot length, leaf number, or total leaf area of young ‘Red Yorking’ apple ( Malus pumila Mill.) trees grown in a greenhouse. Dry weights of leaves and stems were suppressed by 80% shade. Net photosynthesis (Pn), dark respiration (Rd), and specific leaf weight (SLW) were higher in sun than in shade leaves and adaptations in all 3 parameters occurred as a result of changing light conditions, even after leaf expansion had ceased.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light treatments did not affect shoot length, leaf number or total leaf area.

Material
Red Yorkinge0
Treatment
light treatmentse0
Outcome
shoot length, leaf number, or total leaf areae0
Direction
did not affecte0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eight different light treatments did not affect shoot length, leaf number, or total leaf area of young ‘Red Yorking’ apple ( Malus pumila Mill.) trees grown in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

80% shade suppressed dry weights of leaves and stems.

Treatment
80% shadee0
Outcome
Dry weights of leaves and stemse0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry weights of leaves and stems were suppressed by 80% shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–243 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sun leaves had higher net photosynthesis, dark respiration and specific leaf weight than shade leaves.

Outcome
Net photosynthesis (Pn), dark respiration (Rd), and specific leaf weight (SLW)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
shade leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net photosynthesis (Pn), dark respiration (Rd), and specific leaf weight (SLW) were higher in sun than in shade leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–363 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three leaf parameters adapted to changed light conditions even after expansion ceased.

Outcome
adaptations in all 3 parameterse0
Qualifier
even after leaf expansion had ceasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adaptations in all 3 parameters occurred as a result of changing light conditions, even after leaf expansion had ceased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑

shade · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

17 papers: 1 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.