View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A. japonica did not form knobs after antibiotic or heat treatment.
Treatmentantibiotics or by heat treatment e0 Outcomeknobs are never formed e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “theA. japonica which is closely affined to them and non-leaf-nodular plant, knobs are never formed either by antibiotics or by heat treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–477 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
K treatments showed no consistent impacts on measured potato tuber quality traits.
TaxonMesa Russet potatoes e1 Outcometuber quality (tuber dry weight, specific gravity, cracks, knobs, and hollow heart) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Measurements of tuber quality (tuber dry weight, specific gravity, cracks, knobs , and hollow heart) and plant growth (tuber bulking, aboveground biomass, stem number, and tuber number) showed no consistent treatment impacts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–1003 e1 “production of Mesa Russet potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–277 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
K treatments showed no consistent impacts on measured potato growth traits.
TaxonMesa Russet potatoes e1 Outcomeplant growth (tuber bulking, aboveground biomass, stem number, and tuber number) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Measurements of tuber quality (tuber dry weight, specific gravity, cracks, knobs , and hollow heart) and plant growth (tuber bulking, aboveground biomass, stem number, and tuber number) showed no consistent treatment impacts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–1003 e1 “production of Mesa Russet potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–277 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The presence of Ab10 does not affect the rate of normal chromosome movement.
TreatmentThe presence of Ab10 e3 Outcomerate of normal chromosome movement e3 Directiondoes not affect e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In maize, neocentromeres are induced by a gene or genes on Abnormal chromosome 10 (Ab10) which causes heterochromatic knobs to move poleward at meiotic anaphase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–243 e3 “The presence of Ab10 does not affect the rate of normal chromosome movement but propels neocentromeres poleward at rates as high as 1.4 micron/min ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–912 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
CRISPR mutagenesis of Trkin on Ab10 does not improve meiotic drive or fitness in maize.
TreatmentCRISPR mutagenesis e3 Outcomedrive or fitness e4 Directiondoes not improve e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “In maize, there are 2 meiotic drive systems that target large heterochromatic knobs composed of tandem repeats known as knob180 and TR-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 e3 “We also carried out CRISPR mutagenesis to test the role of Trkin on Ab10 and K10L2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–966 e4 “The data indicate that the Trkin gene on Ab10 does not improve drive or fitness ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1047 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.