View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grouping by soil horizon worsened regression fits .
Comparatorsoil horizons e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “When root length distributions were grouped according to soil horizons the fits worsened ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1404 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Poisson multiple regression gave the least precise fits for aphid density estimation in all cases.
Outcomeleast precise fits e0 ComparatorMultiple regression with Poisson errors e0 Verbatim
e0 “Multiple regression with Poisson errors gave the least precise fits in all cases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–702 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
GIS-derived nutrient data resulted in poorer model fits .
Comparatorsite‐specific nutrient data e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Reanalysis showed that GIS‐derived soil nutrient data had less explanatory power than site‐specific nutrient data, and resulted in poorer model fits . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1542 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Estimated flux gave poorer fits than D50 for radish growth measures.
Comparatorregressions based on the D5 0 index e0 Verbatim
e0 “With radish, linear regressions of various growth measures using estimated flux (FLUXSUMC) as the dependent variable generally showed poorer fits than regressions based on the D5 0 index. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5086–5273 Other claims from this paper (19) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Brody model was an exception to generally good pequi growth model fits for fresh mass.
Outcomeadjustment to pequi growth data e0 Verbatim
e0 “The models presented good quality in the adjustment to pequi growth data, except for the Brody model for fresh mass. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1243 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
CLM5.0 fits MODIS LAI seasonal cycles worse than CLM4.5.
Outcomeagreement in seasonal cycles e0 Verbatim
e0 “the agreement in seasonal cycles is worse in CLM5.0 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–930 e1 “Although the agreement in LAI magnitude between CLM5.0 and MODIS is better than CLM4.5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–877 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Pooled regression fit was weaker than separate crop fits .
Outcomecoefficient of determination e0 Comparatorunpooled data e0 Verbatim
e0 “When all data from all crops were pooled, the regression line did not have as high a coefficient of determination (r2=0.73) as it did with the unpooled data. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–560 t0 “Tomatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The kinetic model fits were unsuitable because normalized standard errors were high.
Outcomenormalized standard errors e0 Verbatim
e0 “The fitting for the kinetic models is not very suitable since we found that the normalized standard errors were rather high ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1289 e1 “using grapes placed in a polypropylene container ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–548 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The predictive equations VSdig and Rodig had the poorest concordance with in vivo digestibility (ρc 0.21 and 0.33).
Qualifierfor VSdig and Rodig e1 Verbatim
t0 “Thinopyrum ponticum (Tall Wheatgrass) Hay and Haylage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–134 e1 “the predictive equations showed the poorest fits (ρc 0.21 and 0.33 for VSdig and Rodig, respectively) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1423 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Modelled NH3 concentrations are too low during and after leaf fall.
Outcomemodelled concentrations e7 Comparatormeasured concentrations e6 Verbatim
e1 “for the Danish beech forest, Lille Bøgeskov ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–364 e6 “The modelled concentration from DAMOS fits well the measured concentrations before leaf fall ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1427 e7 “During and after leaf fall, the modelled concentrations are too low ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1496 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.