Search claims · PlantClaims

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The HPLC method showed good repeatability.

Taxon: Rumex gmelinit0
Outcome: good repeatabilitye0
Value: good repeatabilitye0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageInteractorTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“this method has a good repeatability”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–515

t0
“Rumex gmelini”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–33

Title

HPLC fingerprint of Rumex gmelini from different habitats

Cui Honghua 2005

Other claims from this paper (2)

Observation Common peak area ratios differed among samples.
Method / resource The authors conclude the method can establish a chromatographic fingerprint with high specificity.

Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tool increased repeatability.

Outcome: repeatabilitye0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the repeatability in results were increased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1522

Title

Leaf detector box: Artificial vision system for leaf area identification

Manuel Agudelo Restrepo Cristian; Eduardo Roa-Guerrero Edgar; Numpaque López Humberto African Journal of Agricultural Research 2017. doi:10.5897/ajar2016.11698

Other claims from this paper (7)

Method / resource Leaf area estimates had determination coefficient greater than 0.97 versus expert manual analysis.
Method / resource Repeated orange tree leaf measures had variance 0.00024.
Method / resource Repeated lemon tree leaf measures had variance 0.007.
Method / resource Repeated almond tree leaf measures had variance 0.008.
Method / resource Repeated mango tree leaf measures had variance 0.001.
Method / resource The tool reduced the time required to detect leaf area.
Method / resource The tool reduced subjective leaf area assessment.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two repeatability methods agreed in magnitude, though repeatability differed among 14 traits.

Taxon: peachPrunus persicat0
Outcome: repeatability coefficientse0
Comparator: the two methodse0

Verbatim

e0
“There was agreement on the magnitude of repeatability coefficients obtained by the two methods; however, they varied among the 14 characteristics”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1025

e1
“ANOVA and CPCOR”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–651

t0
“peach fruits”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101

Title

Repeatability, correlation and path analysis of physical and chemical characteristics of peach fruits

Rosana Gonçalves Pires Matias; Claudio Horst Bruckner; Pedro Crescêncio Souza Carneiro; et al. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 2014. doi:10.1590/0100-2945-272/13

Other claims from this paper (4)

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fingerprint method showed good repeatability.

Outcome: repeatabilitye0
Direction: goode0
Comparator: this methode0

Verbatim

e0
“this method had a good repeatability”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–386

Title

Fingerprint of Flos Lonicerae by HPLC-FPC

Qian Wang Zhongchengyao 2005

Other claims from this paper (4)

Method / resource HPLC separated Flos Lonicerae constituents well.
Method / resource An HPLC fingerprint was established from ten batches.
Observation Eleven common peaks had exclusive properties.
Method / resource The method can conveniently evaluate Flos Lonicerae quality.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simplified AmpSeq showed high repeatability.

Outcome: repeatabilitye0
Value: high repeatabilitye0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“Simplified AmpSeq has the advantages of high repeatability”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1118

Title

Rapid and easy construction of a simplified amplicon sequencing (simplified AmpSeq) library for marker-assisted selection

Sogo Nishio; Shigeki Moriya; Miyuki Kunihisa; et al. Scientific Reports 2023. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-37522-1

Other claims from this paper (5)

Method / resource Simplified AmpSeq genotype databases were created for Japanese pear breeding material.
Method / resource Simplified AmpSeq genotype databases were created for Japanese chestnut breeding material.
Method / resource Simplified AmpSeq genotype databases were created for apple breeding material.
Method / resource Simplified AmpSeq could estimate allele number in polyploids.
Method / resource Simplified AmpSeq allowed semi-automatic target-allele-frequency evaluation.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Assay repeatability was 8.5%.

Taxon: Ornithogalum caudatum AitAlbuca bracteatat0
Outcome: repeatabilitye0
Value: 8.5%e0

Verbatim

e0
“repeatability 8.5%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–324

t0
“Ornithogalum caudatum Ait”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–55

Title

Polysaccharide Assay Study of Ornithogalum caudatum Ait

WU Li-jun Modern Chinese Medicine 2011

Other claims from this paper (7)

Method / resource The assay had a linear range of 0.408 3～0.816 6 mg.
Method / resource Repeatability RSD was 0.7%.
Method / resource Assay recovery was 97.4%.
Method / resource Recovery RSD was 1.1%.
Method / resource Precision RSD was 0.1%.
Method / resource Sample absorbance remained stable for 45 minutes.
Method / resource The sample remained stable for 24 hours.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability of S 2 i and r 2 i was low.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: repeatabilitye0
Value: lowe0

Verbatim

e0
“repeatability of S 2 i and r 2 i s were low”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1059

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62

Title

Repeatability of Stability Estimators for Grain Yield in Wheat

Md. Jalaluddin; S. A. Harrison Crop Science 1993. doi:10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183x003300040017x

Other claims from this paper (6)

Method / resource Three stability estimators were not repeatable between environment subsets.
Method / resource Only b i and CV i were repeatable across environment subsets.
Method / resource CV i was unreliable for genotypic stability because its ranking followed mean yield ranking.
Method / resource Mean yield was the most repeatable genotypic character.
Recommendation Combined b i and mean yield may improve selection for yield stability.
Recommendation Low S 2 i or Type-4 variance may substitute when linear regression does not fit.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The analytical method had repeatability below 12%.

Taxon: aged garlict0
Outcome: repeatabilitye6
Value: < 12%e6

Verbatim

t0
“from aged garlic”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–82

e6
“appropriate repeatability (< 12%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–665

Title

Simultaneous microwave-assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from aged garlic

I. Jiménez-Amezcua; A. González-Prada; M. Díez-Municio; et al. Journal of Chromatography A 2023. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464128

Other claims from this paper (9)

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Method repeatability declined as species prevalence increased.

Outcome: method repeatabilitye0
Direction: lowere0
Comparator: species prevalence increasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“Repeatability plots displayed lower method repeatability as species prevalence increased.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1177

Title

Technical note: Comparing 4 techniques for estimating desired grass species composition in horse pastures1

Laura Beth Kenny; Daniel Ward; Mark G Robson; et al. Journal of Animal Science 2018. doi:10.1093/jas/sky111

Other claims from this paper (10)

Method / resource The techniques did not differ in detecting creeping bentgrass.
Method / resource The techniques did not differ in detecting orchardgrass.
Method / resource Methods differed in detecting Kentucky bluegrass.
Method / resource Methods differed in detecting tall fescue.
Method / resource Methods differed in detecting other.
Method / resource Five of 30 method pairs showed significant overall bias, including three LPI 3-50 versus EPED pairs.
Method / resource LPI 3-50 and LPI 5-30 agreed perfectly in prevalence and bias.
Method / resource StPt and EPED agreed perfectly in prevalence and bias.
Method / resource LPI 3-50 and EPED were the most dissimilar techniques.
Recommendation The authors selected StPt because it represented pastures thoroughly and was easy to use.

Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors judged the method stable and reliable with good repeatability.

Taxon: Herba Lophatherit0
Outcome: stable and reliable with good repeatabilitye0
Comparator: good repeatabilitye0

Verbatim

e0
“This method is stable and reliable with good repeatability”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–725

t0
“Herba Lophatheri”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–44

Title

A HPLC Fingerprint Study of Herba Lophatheri

WU Qi-nan Nanjing Zhongyiyao Daxue xuebao 2009

Other claims from this paper (2)

Method / resource HPLC fingerprinting identified 10 common peaks.
Method / resource Methodological studies found the fingerprint technique conformed to fingerprint technology requirements.

“repeatability”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics