Claim · model-written summary
S1 decreased leaf relative water content by 17%.
- Taxon
- safflower
Carthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- S1 irrigation levele0
- Outcome
- relative water content (RWC) of the leafe0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 17 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“safflower”
e0“The S1 irrigation level led to a decrease in Fv/Fm (5 %), relative water content (RWC) of the leaf (17 %)”
Title
Eisa Maghsoudi; Alireza Yadavi; Hamidreza Balouchi; et al. Industrial Crops and Products 2024. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119601
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Intervention effect Stem-elongation irrigation cut-off decreased Fv/Fm by 5%.
- Intervention effect S1 decreased leaf chlorophyll by 22%.
- Intervention effect S1 decreased leaf soluble proteins by 21%.
- Intervention effect S1 increased electrolyte leakage by 33%.
- Intervention effect S1 increased carotenoids by 43%.
- Intervention effect S1 increased proline by 42%.
- Intervention effect S1 increased leaf soluble sugars by 39%.
- Intervention effect Organic fertilizer alone or combined with chemical fertilizer raised Fv/Fm, RWC and chlorophyll under cut-off.
- Intervention effect Organic fertilizer raised leaf soluble proteins under irrigation cut-off.
- Intervention effect Organic fertilizer decreased carotenoids, proline and soluble sugars.
- Observation Complete irrigation gave the highest biological yield of 21.62 t ha −1.
- Observation N3 gave the highest biological yield of 21.93 t ha −1.
- Intervention effect N3 increased grain yield by 3.34 t ha −1 in 2015.
- Intervention effect N2 increased grain yield by 3.56 t ha −1 in 2016.
- Observation Vegetative-stage irrigation cut-off had the greatest negative biological-yield effect.
- Observation Flowering and pollination irrigation cut-off was most detrimental for grain yield.
- Intervention effect N2 and N3 reduced the negative impact of water deficiency.