View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Zea mays ✕
Intervention effect observed original result no effect simulated Claim · model-written summary
A triazine ban would not necessarily decrease weed control.
A triazine ban e0 not necessarily decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A triazine ban would likely in crease costs, labor, and total pounds of active in gredients of substitute herbicides, but would not necessarily decrease weed control. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–582 t0 “Corn Production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–59 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought did not significantly decrease starch.
drought stress e1 without a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “This occurred without a significant decrease in starch. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–832 t0 “maize plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 e1 “Another consequence of drought stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–639 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The disabled mutant EGS did not produce the decrease observed with the functional EGS.
a disabled mutant EGS was expressed e0 This decrease was not observed e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “This decrease was not observed in experiments where a disabled mutant EGS was expressed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–791 t0 “maize cells ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–66 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Chilling part of the root did not cause a significant decrease in shoot water content.
chilling of a part of the root e1 shoot water content e1 did not cause any significant decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “maize plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 e1 “The chilling of a part of the root did not cause any significant decrease in shoot water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–96 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Short-term conservation tillage did not significantly decrease corn yield.
short-term implementation of conservation tillage e0 did not result in a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the short-term implementation of conservation tillage did not result in a significant decrease in corn yield. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1920–2029 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Total chlorophyll concentration did not decrease as leaf area duration in creased.
total concentration of chlorophylls e1 did not lead to a decrease e1 Verbatim
t0 “Organic Growing of Maize Hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–49 e1 “did not lead to a decrease in the total concentration of chlorophylls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1610 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A 25% to 30% irrigation reduction did not decrease maize seed yield.
reduction of 25% ~ 30% in irrigation amount e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “reduction of 25% ~ 30% in irrigation amount did not decrease seed yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1809–1880 t0 “hybrid seed yield of maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–68 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Particulate phytochrome did not substantially decrease during dark in cubation of in tact red-irradiated tissue.
red irradiated tissue e0 no substantial decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “no substantial decrease was observed during dark in cubation of the red irradiated tissue at 0°C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1145 t0 “maize coleoptiles ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–149 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
About 93% of divergent regions showed no significant decrease in heterozygosity, suggesting they are not approaching fixation.
not approaching fixation e0 Verbatim
t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 e0 “Approximately 93% of the divergent regions do not demonstrate a significant decrease in heterozygosity, which suggests that they are not approaching fixation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–970 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
WeedLock treated soils did not significantly decrease maize growth and development.
growth and development e0 did not show any significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “WeedLock did not show any significant decrease in growth and development of Z. mays ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1268 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
Zea mays