View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Zea mays ✕
Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in maize dry weight was comparable with the decrease in plant height and leaf area.
decrease in dry weight e1 no_change inferred e1 plant height and leaf area e1 Verbatim
t0 “Maize(Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 e1 “the decrease in dry weight was comparable with plant height and leaf area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1352 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Kernel dry and fresh weight tended to decrease as NAA concentration increased.
NAA concentration e0 dry weight and fresh weight of the kernel e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “kernel abortion rate tended to increase with the growth of NAA concentration,but the dry weight and fresh weight of the kernel tended to decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–298 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Root dry weight of chilling-tolerant maize hybrids did not decrease .
maize hybrids with chilling tolerance e0 dry weight of root e0 didn't decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The results show that the dry weight of root of maize hybrids with chilling tolerance didn't decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–469 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower radiation decrease d root dry weight ratio.
ratio of root dry weight (RWR) to whole plant dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in ratio of root dry weight (RWR) to whole plant dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–941 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease maize fresh or dry weight .
>95% relative humidity e1 growth (fresh weight and dry weight) e0 neither a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 e1 “Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277 e2 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Kernel dry weight subsequently decrease d as hidden loss.
Verbatim
e0 “After that, there was even a decrease in dry weight which was called hidden loss ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1202 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Molybdenum deficiency intensified the copper deficiency decrease in dry weight .
molybdenum was also deficient e0 deficiency of copper e0 normal molybdenum level e0 Verbatim
e0 “The changes in maize induced by the deficiency of copper at normal molybdenum level, decrease of dry weight , of content of chlorophyll, leaf copper, and protein nitrogen, and of activities of cytochrome oxidase and nitrate reductase became more pronounced when molybdenum was also deficient. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–734 Other claims from this paper (17) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each unit decrease in radiation reduced root dry weight by 0.1938 g m−2.
decrease in solar radiation e0 Verbatim
e0 “for every 1‐MJ m −2 decrease in solar radiation, the root dry weight , shoot dry weight , and root/shoot ratio decrease d by 0.1938 g m −2 , 1.3517 g m −2 , and 0.0103 × 10 −2 , respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1067 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each unit decrease in radiation reduced shoot dry weight by 1.3517 g m−2.
decrease in solar radiation e0 shoot dry weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “for every 1‐MJ m −2 decrease in solar radiation, the root dry weight , shoot dry weight , and root/shoot ratio decrease d by 0.1938 g m −2 , 1.3517 g m −2 , and 0.0103 × 10 −2 , respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1067 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Transpiration decrease from FASW 1 under water deficits did not affect maize dry weight until FASW 0.75.
water deficits e1 did not affect e1 until FASW = 0.75 e1 Verbatim
t0 “Maize(Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 e1 “the decrease of transpiration from FASW = 1 in response to water deficits did not affect dry weight until FASW = 0.75 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1260 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays
Zea mays subsp. mays