View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Mild RDI did not significantly decrease net photosynthetic rate or stomatal conductance.
Outcomenet photosynthetic rate( Pn) and stomatal conductance( Gs) e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The net photosynthetic rate( Pn) and stomatal conductance( Gs) did not significantly decrease by the mild RDI( W1) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–814 t0 “island cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–155 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress caused only a slight, non-significant decrease of carbohydrate export from the fed leaves.
Outcomecarbohydrate export from the fed leaves e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Vitis vinifera ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–87 e4 “Water stress caused a significant reduction of leaf water potential, photosynthesis and stomatal conductance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1078 e5 “but caused only a slight, non-significant, decrease of carbohydrate export from the fed leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1174 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
After 30 days, mild RDI did not significantly decrease four fluorescence measures versus normal irrigation.
OutcomeFv / Fm,ΦPSⅡ,q P,NPQ e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “After flowering 30 days, the W1 treatment compared with CK the Fv / Fm,ΦPSⅡ,q P,NPQ did not significantly decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1274 t0 “island cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–155 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The diel differences in latent heat flux did not establish a statistically significant or biologically relevant decrease in seasonal water-use of the intercrop.
Outcomeseasonal water‐use e1 Qualifierstatistically significant or biologically relevant decrease e1 Verbatim
t0 “intercropped maize and soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 e1 “the diel differences in λET fluxes were not sufficient to establish a statistically significant or biologically relevant decrease in seasonal water‐use ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1394–1546 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
UV-B did not significantly affect net photosynthesis or Fv/Fm in maize grown on sufficient nutrients.
TreatmentUV-B treatments e4 Directiondid not significantly affect e4 Qualifierin plants grown on sufficient nutrients e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “near-isogenic maize lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–119 e4 “The UV-B treatments did not significantly affect P N and Fv/Fm in plants grown on sufficient nutrients, except in the low flavonoid lines dta and hi27 in which P N and Fv/Fm decrease d by ∼15 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1449 Other claims from this paper (13) Association author interpretation original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Genotypes without a significant photosynthetic decrease may not have reached technical maturity.
Organ / stagetechnical maturity e0 Outcometechnical maturity e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “As regards the genotypes for which photosynthesis did not reduce significantly, it may be assumed that such plants had not reached technical maturity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–750 t0 “hops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At high nitrogen, elevated carbon dioxide did not significantly decrease ryegrass carboxylation capacity or proteins.
Outcomecarboxylation capacity or proteins e0 Directionno significant decreases e0 Not reported Material Gene Compound Organ / stage Interactor Comparator Setting Value Qualifier
Verbatim
e0 “In high N the re were no significant decrease s in carboxylation capacity or proteins ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1192 t0 “Perennial Ryegrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–148 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf nitrogen content decrease d with increasing CO2 concentration, although the decrease was not statistically significant at maturity.
TreatmentCO 2 concentration e0 OutcomeLeaf nitrogen content e0 Qualifiernot statistically significant at maturity e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Leaf nitrogen content decrease d with the increase of CO 2 concentration although it was not statistically significant at maturity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1148 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–94 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Two tree species showed no significant change in photosynthesis under long-term testing conditions.
Treatmentlong-term testing conditions e7 Directionno_change inferred e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “We studied the exchange of VOCs in relation to CO2 exchange and transpiration of 8 common tree species from the Amazonian floodplain forest grown up from seeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–409 e7 “However, even under long-term testing conditions, two tree species did not show any significant decrease or increase in photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1564 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Three days of recovery did not significantly reduce leaf salt concentrations.
Treatmentrecovery treatment for 3d e0 Outcomeleaf salt concentrations e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e7 “Jatropha curcas (L.) young plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–206 e0 “The recovery treatment for 3d did not significantly decrease the leaf salt concentrations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1234 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.