View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Since 1953, the 25% plot approached the 0% plot in yield .
Verbatim
e0 “Since 1953, the yield of 25% plot approached to that of the 0% plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1369 t0 “Satsuma orange ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant grain yield and plot biological yield correlated positively and significantly with plot grain yield .
Materialgrain yield per plant e0 Outcomegrain yield per plot e0 Verbatim
e0 “grain yield per plant and biological yield per plot reported positive and highly significant genotypic as well as phenotypic correlations with grain yield per plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1460 t0 “mungbean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Chandini had 61.99 kg/ plot yield per plot , exceeding other cultivars.
Comparatorother cultivars e0 Verbatim
t0 “GHERKIN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61 e0 “Chandini cultivar showed superiority over other cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–407 e1 “yield per plot (61.99 kg/ plot ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–634 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield per plot was positively associated with biological yield / plot .
Organ / stagebiological yield/plot e2 OutcomeGrain yield/plot e2 Directionpositively associated e2 Qualifierbiological yield/plot e2 Verbatim
t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 e2 “Grain yield / plot was significantly and positively associated with spike length, spike weight, number of grains/spike, number of spikelets/spike, 1000-grain weight, biological yield / plot , GGR, total chlorophyll content and number of productive tillers/meter. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1154 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment gave the highest yield per plot of 5.82 kg/ plot .
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “yield per plot (5.82 kg/ plot ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1017 e1 “recorded highest values ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–783 t0 “carrot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Biological yield per plot and grain yield per plot had high heritability and genetic advance.
Outcomebiological yield per plot, and grain yield per plot e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “biological yield per plot , and grain yield per plot have high heritability coupled with high genetic advance as a percent of mean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1064 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
T11 produced maximum yield per plot of 6.94 kg plot -1.
Not reported Treatment Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “yield per plot (6.94 kg plot -1) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1141 t0 “Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–124 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
On the basis of cluster means, cluster IV was the important cluster for marketable yield per plot and total yield per plot .
Outcomemarketable yield plot-1 and total yield plot-1 e0 Verbatim
e0 “the important cluster was cluster IV for fruit circumstances, average fruit weight, marketable yield plot -1 and total yield plot -1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–857 e1 “brinjal landraces ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–300 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Testers differed significantly for green fodder yield per plot and grain yield per plot .
Outcomegreen fodder yield per plot and grain yield per plot e3 Verbatim
e0 “Four inbred lines of teosinte ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–250 e3 “While testers were varied significantly for green fodder yield per plot and grain yield per plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–833 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation Significant differences among crosses were found for all studied traits. Observation Lines differed significantly for 100-grain weight and grain yield per plot. Observation Cross × year and L × T × year interactions were significant for all studied traits, except number of tillers per plant (cross × year) and crude protein (L × T × year). Association Parent of inbred line-1 had the highest positive and significant GCA effect for TDN, 100-grain weight and grain yield per plot. Association Parent of inbred line-1 showed desirable GCA for number of tassling date (toward earliness). Association Line-3 had positive and significant GCA for green fodder yield per plot and 100-grain weight. Association The 30k8 (T1) tester was a good general combiner for 100-grain weight, crude protein and grain yield per plot. Association T2 and T3 testers were good general combiners for green fodder yield per plot and TDN. Association Top cross L1 × T3 had the highest SCA effects for TDN, number of tillers per plant and tassling date (toward earliness). Association Top cross L1 × T3 had the highest SCA effects for crude protein and grain yield per plot. Association General combining ability variance (σ²GCA) was larger than specific combining ability variance (σ²SCA) for green fodder yield per plot, 100-grain weight and grain yield per plot. Association σ²SCA was larger than σ²GCA for TDN, number of tillers per plant and plant height. Association σ²SCA was larger than σ²GCA for tassling date and crude protein percentage. Association All topcrosses were superior to their parents of teosinte for green fodder yield per plot and tassling date (toward earliness), except (L2 × T2) and (L2 × T3). Association All topcrosses were superior to their parents of teosinte for grain yield per plot and 100-grain weight, except (L2 × T2) and (L2 × T3). Association All topcrosses were superior to their parents of teosinte for crude protein, except (L2 × T3). Observation Top crosses for crude protein were L2 × T1, L3 × T1 and L4 × T1; for grain yield per plot they were L1 × T3, L1 × T2, L4 × T1, L2 × T1 and L3 × T1. Recommendation Top crosses can be used for improvement in green fodder yield and grain yield, for silage in the dough stage. Recommendation Inbred lines L1 and L3 could be recommended for advanced stage of evaluation through the breeding program. Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Biological yield per plot was positively correlated with grain yield per plot at 0.932.
Outcomegrain yield per plot e0 Comparatorbiological yield per plot e0 Verbatim
e0 “positive associations of number of tillers per meter (0.487), harvest index (0.499) and biological yield per plot (0.932) with grain yield per plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1482 e1 “Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.