View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing water level significantly decrease d relative water content and membrane stability in dex in Cassia occidentalis .
decrease in water level e0 relative water content and membrane stability index e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Physiological parameters like leaf area in dex, biomass accumulation, relative water content and membrane stability in dex decrease d significantly with decrease in water level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–867 t0 “Cassia occidentalis
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–70 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit significantly decrease d relative water content and leaf osmotic potential in forage rape.
water-deficit treatment e2 relative water content (RWC) and leaf osmotic potential e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in the leaves with different maturities in forage rape ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–328 e1 “The significant decrease in relative water content (RWC) and leaf osmotic potential ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–427 e2 “after 5 d of water -deficit treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–494 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly reduced relative water content .
Drought stress at 50% heading stage e0 relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “paddy varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–110 e0 “Drought stress at 50% heading stage led to a significant decrease in relative water content , percentage in filled grain and grain yield per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–949 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit significantly decrease d leaf relative water content and leaf water potential in all cultivars.
leaf relative water content and leaf water potential e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Medicago sativa
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–73 e0 “led to a significant decrease in leaf relative water content and leaf water potential ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–595 e1 “In all cultivars, water deficit stress reduced the whole plant growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–470 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shoot relative water content fell 28.65% versus control.
relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
t0 “MAIZE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 e0 “There is a significant decrease in relative water content (RWC) in both shoot and root by 28.65% and 11.13%, respectively, compared with the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1206 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Root relative water content fell 11.13% versus control.
relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
t0 “MAIZE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 e0 “There is a significant decrease in relative water content (RWC) in both shoot and root by 28.65% and 11.13%, respectively, compared with the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1206 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought slightly significantly decrease d relative water content in C2.
drought treatment e0 relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At the end of drought treatment, a slightly significant decrease in relative water content (RWC) was shown in two Ae. crassa accessions (C2 and C3) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–593 t0 “Controlled Drought ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–101 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought slightly significantly decrease d relative water content in C3.
drought treatment e0 relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At the end of drought treatment, a slightly significant decrease in relative water content (RWC) was shown in two Ae. crassa accessions (C2 and C3) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–593 t0 “Controlled Drought ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–101 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
After three days of water deficit, cotton PS II quantum yield and relative water content decrease d significantly.
water deficit conditions e0 quantum yield of photosystem (PS) II and relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A significant decrease in physiological parameters like quantum yield of photosystem (PS) II and relative water content was observed under water deficit conditions after 3 DAT. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–742 t0 “Bt cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–36 Other claims from this paper (8) Association Membrane injury, MDA, and H2O2 increased significantly as drought stress increased. Association Catalase and peroxidase rose as cotton experienced stronger drought stress. Association Proline, soluble sugar, and soluble protein content increased with PEG concentration. Observation After six days, cotton PS II quantum yield, chlorophyll, and relative water content increased. Observation At six days, membrane injury, MDA, and H2O2 showed a smaller increase. Observation Catalase and peroxidase levels increased further at six days. Observation Proline, soluble sugar, and soluble protein rose more at six days than at three days. Mechanism The authors interpreted these changes as acclimation to drought through altered metabolism. Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Root in oculation significantly decrease d wheat relative leaf water content .
Root inoculation e0 Helminthosporium sativum t0 pathogen relative leaf water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Root in oculation showed significant decrease in relative leaf water content , whereas root length and root to shoot ratio were also reduced significantly. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–810 t0 “Helminthosporium sativum in wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–120 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
_Senna_occidentalis_-_Habit_-_Les_Martels%2C_Giroussens_Tarn.jpg?width=60)
Senna occidentalist0
Medicago sativa
Zea mays
Triticum aestivum