View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Tomato fruit yield decreased at SWP of 20 kPa.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “TOMATO ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 e0 “while in variants with higher ( SWP of 20 kPa) and lower ( SWP of 40 kPa) soil moisture fruit yield decreased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–962 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Tomato fruit yield decreased at SWP of 40 kPa.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “TOMATO ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 e0 “while in variants with higher ( SWP of 20 kPa) and lower ( SWP of 40 kPa) soil moisture fruit yield decreased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–962 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fall SWP -SKW reduced wheat protein content.
OutcomeWheat protein content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Wheat protein content was also reduced in the Fall SWP ‐SKW tillage treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1261 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cherry shoot growth essentially stopped when SWP fell to –1.5 to –1.7 MPa.
QualifierSWP dropped to between –1.5 to –1.7 MPa e0 Verbatim
e0 “In cherry, SWP was correlated to both leaf stomatal conductance and rates of shoot growth, with shoot growth essentially stopping once SWP dropped to between –1.5 to –1.7 MPa. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–985 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism author interpretation review summary negative measured Claim · model-written summary
SWP mutation appears to shorten the cell proliferation window.
Outcomewindow of cell proliferation e0 Verbatim
e0 “mutation in SWP , which encodes a subunit of the Mediator complex (a transcriptional coactivator), closes the window of cell proliferation earlier ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–666 e1 “struwwelpeter mutant in Arabidopsis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–307 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Other effectors suppressed induced cell death.
Verbatim
e0 “SWP 12 and SWP 21 ( TENGU ‐like) were shown to suppress SWP 11‐, BAX ‐, and/or INF 1‐induced cell death ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–973 e1 “37 candidate effector proteins were transiently expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–392 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fall SWP -SKW reduced wheat yield by about 400 kg ha −1.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “was ∼400 kg ha −1 less for the Fall SWP ‐SKW treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1183 e1 “Wheat yield was more influenced by winter than spring precipitation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1124 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
SWP outside this range reduced and delayed emergence in both lines.
TreatmentSWP beyond this range e0 Directionreduction and delay e0 Verbatim
e0 “Any decrease or increase in SWP beyond this range resulted in a substantial reduction and delay in emergence in both lines. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1161 t0 “faba bean (Vicia faba ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–69 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In 1981, positive SDD scheduling reduced yields compared with SWP control irrigation.
Treatmenttreatments irrigated by an accumulation of positive SDD e0 Comparatorcontrol SWP treatment e0 Verbatim
e0 “In 1981, all treatments irrigated by an accumulation of positive SDD had reduced yields compared to the control SWP treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–872 t0 “Snap Beans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Midday SWP underestimates the greatest water stress experienced by vines in N-S oriented VSP canopies.
Treatmentmeasuring SWP at midday e4 Outcomethe greatest level of water stress e4 Directionunderestimates e4 Verbatim
e0 “Measurements of LWP and SWP were performed on Chardonnay and Pinot noir grapevines on seven cloudless days between bloom and harvest over two years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–441 e4 “Thus, measuring SWP at midday consistently underestimates the greatest level of water stress experienced by vines in N-S oriented, VSP canopies ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1096 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.